{"title":"天文观测台的碳足迹","authors":"Jürgen Knödlseder","doi":"arxiv-2409.04054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The carbon footprint of astronomical research is an increasingly topical\nissue. From a comparison of existing literature, we infer an annual per capita\ncarbon footprint of several tens of tonnes of CO$_2$ equivalents for an average\nperson working in astronomy. Astronomical observatories contribute\nsignificantly to the carbon footprint of astronomy, and we examine the related\nsources of greenhouse gas emissions as well as lever arms for their reduction.\nComparison with other scientific domains illustrates that astronomy is not the\nonly field that needs to accomplish significant carbon footprint reductions of\ntheir research facilities. We show that limiting global warming to 1.5{\\deg}C\nor 2{\\deg}C implies greenhouse gas emission reductions that can only be reached\nby a systemic change of astronomical research activities, and we argue that a\nnew narrative for doing astronomical research is needed if we want to keep our\nplanet habitable.","PeriodicalId":501163,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The carbon footprint of astronomical observatories\",\"authors\":\"Jürgen Knödlseder\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.04054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The carbon footprint of astronomical research is an increasingly topical\\nissue. From a comparison of existing literature, we infer an annual per capita\\ncarbon footprint of several tens of tonnes of CO$_2$ equivalents for an average\\nperson working in astronomy. Astronomical observatories contribute\\nsignificantly to the carbon footprint of astronomy, and we examine the related\\nsources of greenhouse gas emissions as well as lever arms for their reduction.\\nComparison with other scientific domains illustrates that astronomy is not the\\nonly field that needs to accomplish significant carbon footprint reductions of\\ntheir research facilities. We show that limiting global warming to 1.5{\\\\deg}C\\nor 2{\\\\deg}C implies greenhouse gas emission reductions that can only be reached\\nby a systemic change of astronomical research activities, and we argue that a\\nnew narrative for doing astronomical research is needed if we want to keep our\\nplanet habitable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The carbon footprint of astronomical observatories
The carbon footprint of astronomical research is an increasingly topical
issue. From a comparison of existing literature, we infer an annual per capita
carbon footprint of several tens of tonnes of CO$_2$ equivalents for an average
person working in astronomy. Astronomical observatories contribute
significantly to the carbon footprint of astronomy, and we examine the related
sources of greenhouse gas emissions as well as lever arms for their reduction.
Comparison with other scientific domains illustrates that astronomy is not the
only field that needs to accomplish significant carbon footprint reductions of
their research facilities. We show that limiting global warming to 1.5{\deg}C
or 2{\deg}C implies greenhouse gas emission reductions that can only be reached
by a systemic change of astronomical research activities, and we argue that a
new narrative for doing astronomical research is needed if we want to keep our
planet habitable.