利用 4D Flow MRI-CFD 组合框架研究主动脉瓣狭窄导致的血流动力学大体积流动模式

Tianai Wang, Christine Quast, Florian Bönner, Malte Kelm, Tobias Zeus, Teresa Lemainque, Ulrich Steinseifer, Michael Neidlin
{"title":"利用 4D Flow MRI-CFD 组合框架研究主动脉瓣狭窄导致的血流动力学大体积流动模式","authors":"Tianai Wang, Christine Quast, Florian Bönner, Malte Kelm, Tobias Zeus, Teresa Lemainque, Ulrich Steinseifer, Michael Neidlin","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.09.611958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aortic stenosis (AS) leads to alterations of supra-valvular flow patterns. These patterns might lead to, inter alia, increased damage of red blood cell (RBC) membranes. We investigated these patient specific patterns of a severe AS patient and their reversal in healthy flow through a 4D Flow MRI-based CFD methodology. Computational models of subject-specific aortic geometries were created using in-vivo medical imaging data. Temporally and spatially resolved boundary conditions derived from 4D Flow MRI were implemented for an AS patient and a healthy subject. After validation of the in-silico results with in-vivo data, a healthy inflow profile was set for the AS patient in the CFD model. Pathological versus healthy flow fields were compared regarding their blood flow characteristics, i.e. shear stresses on RBCs and helicity. The accuracy of the 4D Flow MRI-based CFD model was proven with excellent agreement between in-vivo and in-silico velocity fields and R² = 0.9. A pathological high shear stress region in the bulk flow was present during late systole with an increase of 125 % compared to both healthy flow. The physiological bihelical structure with predominantly right-handed helices vanished for the pathological state. Instead, a left-handed helix appeared, accompanied by an overall increase in turbulent kinetic energy in areas of accumulated left-handed helicity. The validated 4D Flow MRI-based CFD model identified marked differences between AS and healthy flow. It suggests that altered turbulent and helical structures in the bulk flow are the cause for increased, potentially damaging forces acting upon RBCs in AS.","PeriodicalId":501308,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Bioengineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of hemodynamic bulk flow patterns caused by aortic stenosis using a combined 4D Flow MRI-CFD framework\",\"authors\":\"Tianai Wang, Christine Quast, Florian Bönner, Malte Kelm, Tobias Zeus, Teresa Lemainque, Ulrich Steinseifer, Michael Neidlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.09.611958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aortic stenosis (AS) leads to alterations of supra-valvular flow patterns. These patterns might lead to, inter alia, increased damage of red blood cell (RBC) membranes. We investigated these patient specific patterns of a severe AS patient and their reversal in healthy flow through a 4D Flow MRI-based CFD methodology. Computational models of subject-specific aortic geometries were created using in-vivo medical imaging data. Temporally and spatially resolved boundary conditions derived from 4D Flow MRI were implemented for an AS patient and a healthy subject. After validation of the in-silico results with in-vivo data, a healthy inflow profile was set for the AS patient in the CFD model. Pathological versus healthy flow fields were compared regarding their blood flow characteristics, i.e. shear stresses on RBCs and helicity. The accuracy of the 4D Flow MRI-based CFD model was proven with excellent agreement between in-vivo and in-silico velocity fields and R² = 0.9. A pathological high shear stress region in the bulk flow was present during late systole with an increase of 125 % compared to both healthy flow. The physiological bihelical structure with predominantly right-handed helices vanished for the pathological state. Instead, a left-handed helix appeared, accompanied by an overall increase in turbulent kinetic energy in areas of accumulated left-handed helicity. The validated 4D Flow MRI-based CFD model identified marked differences between AS and healthy flow. It suggests that altered turbulent and helical structures in the bulk flow are the cause for increased, potentially damaging forces acting upon RBCs in AS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Bioengineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.611958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.611958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)会导致瓣上血流模式的改变。除其他外,这些模式可能会导致红细胞膜损伤加重。我们通过基于 4D 流磁共振成像的 CFD 方法研究了严重 AS 患者的这些特定模式及其在健康血流中的逆转。利用体内医学成像数据创建了特定受试者主动脉几何形状的计算模型。对一名 AS 患者和一名健康受试者实施了从 4D Flow MRI 导出的时间和空间分辨边界条件。在利用体内数据对模拟结果进行验证后,在 CFD 模型中为强直性脊柱炎患者设置了健康的流入曲线。病理流场与健康流场的血流特征(即红细胞上的剪应力和螺旋度)进行了比较。基于 4D Flow MRI 的 CFD 模型的准确性得到了证实,体内和实验室速度场之间的一致性极佳,R² = 0.9。在收缩晚期,大量血流中出现了病理性高剪应力区域,与健康血流相比增加了 125%。在病理状态下,以右手螺旋为主的生理双螺旋结构消失了。取而代之的是左手螺旋的出现,伴随着左手螺旋累积区域湍流动能的整体增加。经过验证的基于 4D Flow MRI 的 CFD 模型确定了强直性脊柱炎和健康气流之间的明显差异。这表明,体流中湍流和螺旋结构的改变是导致强直性脊柱炎患者红细胞受到的潜在破坏力增加的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of hemodynamic bulk flow patterns caused by aortic stenosis using a combined 4D Flow MRI-CFD framework
Aortic stenosis (AS) leads to alterations of supra-valvular flow patterns. These patterns might lead to, inter alia, increased damage of red blood cell (RBC) membranes. We investigated these patient specific patterns of a severe AS patient and their reversal in healthy flow through a 4D Flow MRI-based CFD methodology. Computational models of subject-specific aortic geometries were created using in-vivo medical imaging data. Temporally and spatially resolved boundary conditions derived from 4D Flow MRI were implemented for an AS patient and a healthy subject. After validation of the in-silico results with in-vivo data, a healthy inflow profile was set for the AS patient in the CFD model. Pathological versus healthy flow fields were compared regarding their blood flow characteristics, i.e. shear stresses on RBCs and helicity. The accuracy of the 4D Flow MRI-based CFD model was proven with excellent agreement between in-vivo and in-silico velocity fields and R² = 0.9. A pathological high shear stress region in the bulk flow was present during late systole with an increase of 125 % compared to both healthy flow. The physiological bihelical structure with predominantly right-handed helices vanished for the pathological state. Instead, a left-handed helix appeared, accompanied by an overall increase in turbulent kinetic energy in areas of accumulated left-handed helicity. The validated 4D Flow MRI-based CFD model identified marked differences between AS and healthy flow. It suggests that altered turbulent and helical structures in the bulk flow are the cause for increased, potentially damaging forces acting upon RBCs in AS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信