毁容与解脱:尤西比对殉难的描绘以及里昂和维埃纳教会的信函

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY
James M. Petitfils
{"title":"毁容与解脱:尤西比对殉难的描绘以及里昂和维埃纳教会的信函","authors":"James M. Petitfils","doi":"10.1353/earl.2024.a936758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This study examines Eusebius’s physical portrayals of martyrs, situating them within his moral and rhetorical agenda in his <i>Ecclesiastical History</i>. To bring the contours of his discourse into greater relief, I first compare Eusebius’s martyr portrayals with those of the <i>Letter of the Churches of Lyons and Vienne</i> (one of the longest ostensibly non-Eusebian martyr narratives in the <i>History</i>). After noting several minor differences between the descriptions in Eusebius’s martyr stories and those populating the <i>Letter</i>, I highlight one significant discursive disparity: namely, the physiognomic and sartorial details in the <i>Letter</i> tend to emphasize the martyrs’ divine physical restoration and glorification during their ordeals, while Eusebian martyr stories place greater emphasis on the martyrs’ gruesome disfigurement. Having made a case for the <i>Letter</i>’s distinct deployment of physical details—further suggesting its authorial independence from Eusebius—the remainder of the article focuses on one particular historiographic and pedagogical aim to which Eusebius deploys these grisly martyrological images: amplifying the irrationality and cruelty of persecuting imperial leaders. From the early books of the <i>History</i>, Eusebius frequently catalogues imperial leaders as either pious respecters of the Christians, in step with traditional Roman <i>mores</i>, or impious persecutors, exemplifying their irrationality and lack of imperial virtue. The mangled bodies of the martyrs adorn Eusebius’s <i>History</i>, I argue, at least in part as gruesome monuments to immoral, barbaric leaders. These evil <i>exempla</i>, in turn, provide both an effective foil for the virtuous leadership of Christian-favoring leaders and a stern moral warning for future leaders. At various points in this article, I also bring Eusebius’s earlier narrative, <i>Martyrs of Palestine</i>, into the conversation to demonstrate further the relative stability of Eusebius’s physiognomic portrayals of martyrs. </p></p>","PeriodicalId":44662,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disfigurement and Deliverance: Eusebian Portrayals of Martyrdom and the Letter of the Churches of Lyons and Vienne\",\"authors\":\"James M. Petitfils\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/earl.2024.a936758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This study examines Eusebius’s physical portrayals of martyrs, situating them within his moral and rhetorical agenda in his <i>Ecclesiastical History</i>. To bring the contours of his discourse into greater relief, I first compare Eusebius’s martyr portrayals with those of the <i>Letter of the Churches of Lyons and Vienne</i> (one of the longest ostensibly non-Eusebian martyr narratives in the <i>History</i>). After noting several minor differences between the descriptions in Eusebius’s martyr stories and those populating the <i>Letter</i>, I highlight one significant discursive disparity: namely, the physiognomic and sartorial details in the <i>Letter</i> tend to emphasize the martyrs’ divine physical restoration and glorification during their ordeals, while Eusebian martyr stories place greater emphasis on the martyrs’ gruesome disfigurement. Having made a case for the <i>Letter</i>’s distinct deployment of physical details—further suggesting its authorial independence from Eusebius—the remainder of the article focuses on one particular historiographic and pedagogical aim to which Eusebius deploys these grisly martyrological images: amplifying the irrationality and cruelty of persecuting imperial leaders. From the early books of the <i>History</i>, Eusebius frequently catalogues imperial leaders as either pious respecters of the Christians, in step with traditional Roman <i>mores</i>, or impious persecutors, exemplifying their irrationality and lack of imperial virtue. The mangled bodies of the martyrs adorn Eusebius’s <i>History</i>, I argue, at least in part as gruesome monuments to immoral, barbaric leaders. These evil <i>exempla</i>, in turn, provide both an effective foil for the virtuous leadership of Christian-favoring leaders and a stern moral warning for future leaders. At various points in this article, I also bring Eusebius’s earlier narrative, <i>Martyrs of Palestine</i>, into the conversation to demonstrate further the relative stability of Eusebius’s physiognomic portrayals of martyrs. </p></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2024.a936758\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2024.a936758","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究探讨了尤西比乌斯对殉道者的具体描绘,并将这些描绘置于其《教会史》中的道德和修辞议程中。为了更清晰地展现尤西比乌斯的论述轮廓,我首先将尤西比乌斯对殉道者的描绘与《里昂和维埃纳教会书信》(《教会史》中最长的非尤西比乌斯殉道者叙事之一)中对殉道者的描绘进行了比较。在指出尤西比乌斯的殉教故事与《书信》中的殉教故事在描述上的一些细微差别之后,我强调了一个重要的话语差异:即《书信》中的相貌和服饰细节倾向于强调殉教者在磨难中神圣的身体复原和荣耀,而尤西比乌斯的殉教故事则更强调殉教者可怕的毁容。在论证了《书信》对身体细节的独特描写--进一步表明其作者独立于尤西比乌斯--之后,文章的其余部分将重点放在尤西比乌斯描写这些可怕的殉道者形象的一个特殊的历史学和教学目的上:放大迫害帝国领导人的非理性和残忍。尤西比乌斯在《历史》早期的书中,经常将帝国领导人归类为对基督徒虔诚的尊重者,与传统的罗马风尚保持一致,或者是不虔诚的迫害者,充分体现了他们的非理性和缺乏帝国美德。我认为,尤西比乌斯的《历史》中装饰着殉教者残缺不全的尸体,至少在一定程度上是不道德、野蛮领导人的可怕纪念碑。反过来,这些邪恶的楷模既有效地衬托了基督教领袖的美德,也为未来的领袖们敲响了严厉的道德警钟。在本文的不同部分,我还将尤西比乌斯的早期叙事《巴勒斯坦殉教者》引入对话,以进一步证明尤西比乌斯对殉教者的相貌描绘具有相对的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disfigurement and Deliverance: Eusebian Portrayals of Martyrdom and the Letter of the Churches of Lyons and Vienne

Abstract:

This study examines Eusebius’s physical portrayals of martyrs, situating them within his moral and rhetorical agenda in his Ecclesiastical History. To bring the contours of his discourse into greater relief, I first compare Eusebius’s martyr portrayals with those of the Letter of the Churches of Lyons and Vienne (one of the longest ostensibly non-Eusebian martyr narratives in the History). After noting several minor differences between the descriptions in Eusebius’s martyr stories and those populating the Letter, I highlight one significant discursive disparity: namely, the physiognomic and sartorial details in the Letter tend to emphasize the martyrs’ divine physical restoration and glorification during their ordeals, while Eusebian martyr stories place greater emphasis on the martyrs’ gruesome disfigurement. Having made a case for the Letter’s distinct deployment of physical details—further suggesting its authorial independence from Eusebius—the remainder of the article focuses on one particular historiographic and pedagogical aim to which Eusebius deploys these grisly martyrological images: amplifying the irrationality and cruelty of persecuting imperial leaders. From the early books of the History, Eusebius frequently catalogues imperial leaders as either pious respecters of the Christians, in step with traditional Roman mores, or impious persecutors, exemplifying their irrationality and lack of imperial virtue. The mangled bodies of the martyrs adorn Eusebius’s History, I argue, at least in part as gruesome monuments to immoral, barbaric leaders. These evil exempla, in turn, provide both an effective foil for the virtuous leadership of Christian-favoring leaders and a stern moral warning for future leaders. At various points in this article, I also bring Eusebius’s earlier narrative, Martyrs of Palestine, into the conversation to demonstrate further the relative stability of Eusebius’s physiognomic portrayals of martyrs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The official publication of the North American Patristics Society (NAPS), the Journal of Early Christian Studies focuses on the study of Christianity in the context of late ancient societies and religions from c.e. 100-700. Incorporating The Second Century (an earlier publication), the Journal publishes the best of traditional patristics scholarship while showcasing articles that call attention to newer themes and methodologies than those appearing in other patristics journals. An extensive book review section is featured in every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信