孕妇正中神经直径的声像图变化:腕管综合征的一个指标

Syed Muhammad Yousaf Farooq, Sapna Daud Waris, Syed Amir Gilani, Mahjabeen Liaqat, Zareen Fatima, Asif Hanif, Faiza Jabeen
{"title":"孕妇正中神经直径的声像图变化:腕管综合征的一个指标","authors":"Syed Muhammad Yousaf Farooq, Sapna Daud Waris, Syed Amir Gilani, Mahjabeen Liaqat, Zareen Fatima, Asif Hanif, Faiza Jabeen","doi":"10.1007/s42399-024-01726-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous research suggested that physiological changes occurring during pregnancy, such as fluid retention and hormonal fluctuations, might influence the dimensions of peripheral nerves. Understanding these potential differences is important for accurately interpreting sonographic findings and diagnosing conditions related to median nerve compression or entrapment in pregnant women. The objective of this study is to compare pregnant and non-pregnant females’ median nerve cross-sectional area. This case–control analytical study was conducted at the Department of Radiology, Imran Idrees Hospital, Sialkot, for 9 months. A convenient sampling technique was used to collect the data. The calculated sample size was 155, comprising 76 pregnant and 79 non-pregnant females. Inclusion criteria: For cases: symptomatic and asymptomatic pregnant women in their third trimester aged between 18 and 45 years. For controls: non-pregnant women within the same age group without any symptoms of CTS were taken as the control group. One hundred and 55 females were included. Pregnant females had a larger median nerve in the right hand (13.13 mm<sup>2</sup>) compared to non-pregnant females (11.75 mm<sup>2</sup>), with a significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.000). Similarly, pregnant females also had a larger median nerve in the left hand (12.83 mm<sup>2</sup>) compared to non-pregnant females (11.72 mm<sup>2</sup>), with a significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.000). There was no significant difference in echogenicity between pregnant and non-pregnant females. The results suggest significant differences in mean measurements between pregnant and non-pregnant groups for both right- and left-hand median nerve cross-sectional areas, with a larger diameter in pregnant females than non-pregnant females.</p>","PeriodicalId":21944,"journal":{"name":"SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sonographic Changes in Median Nerve Diameter in Pregnant Women: An Indicator of Carpel Tunnel Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Syed Muhammad Yousaf Farooq, Sapna Daud Waris, Syed Amir Gilani, Mahjabeen Liaqat, Zareen Fatima, Asif Hanif, Faiza Jabeen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42399-024-01726-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Previous research suggested that physiological changes occurring during pregnancy, such as fluid retention and hormonal fluctuations, might influence the dimensions of peripheral nerves. Understanding these potential differences is important for accurately interpreting sonographic findings and diagnosing conditions related to median nerve compression or entrapment in pregnant women. The objective of this study is to compare pregnant and non-pregnant females’ median nerve cross-sectional area. This case–control analytical study was conducted at the Department of Radiology, Imran Idrees Hospital, Sialkot, for 9 months. A convenient sampling technique was used to collect the data. The calculated sample size was 155, comprising 76 pregnant and 79 non-pregnant females. Inclusion criteria: For cases: symptomatic and asymptomatic pregnant women in their third trimester aged between 18 and 45 years. For controls: non-pregnant women within the same age group without any symptoms of CTS were taken as the control group. One hundred and 55 females were included. Pregnant females had a larger median nerve in the right hand (13.13 mm<sup>2</sup>) compared to non-pregnant females (11.75 mm<sup>2</sup>), with a significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.000). Similarly, pregnant females also had a larger median nerve in the left hand (12.83 mm<sup>2</sup>) compared to non-pregnant females (11.72 mm<sup>2</sup>), with a significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.000). There was no significant difference in echogenicity between pregnant and non-pregnant females. The results suggest significant differences in mean measurements between pregnant and non-pregnant groups for both right- and left-hand median nerve cross-sectional areas, with a larger diameter in pregnant females than non-pregnant females.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-024-01726-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-024-01726-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以前的研究表明,妊娠期间发生的生理变化(如体液潴留和荷尔蒙波动)可能会影响周围神经的尺寸。了解这些潜在的差异对于准确解读超声波检查结果和诊断与孕妇正中神经受压或卡压相关的疾病非常重要。本研究的目的是比较孕妇和非孕妇正中神经的横截面积。这项病例对照分析研究在锡亚尔科特伊姆兰-伊德里斯医院放射科进行,为期 9 个月。研究采用方便抽样技术收集数据。计算得出的样本量为 155 例,其中 76 例为孕妇,79 例为非孕妇。纳入标准:病例:有症状和无症状的怀孕三个月的孕妇,年龄在 18 至 45 岁之间。对照组:同年龄组无任何 CTS 症状的非孕妇为对照组。共纳入了 155 名女性。与非怀孕女性(11.75 平方毫米)相比,怀孕女性右手正中神经的面积更大(13.13 平方毫米),差异显著(P = 0.000)。同样,与非怀孕女性(11.72 平方毫米)相比,怀孕女性左手的正中神经也更大(12.83 平方毫米),差异显著(P = 0.000)。怀孕女性和非怀孕女性的回声无明显差异。结果表明,妊娠组和非妊娠组的左右手正中神经横截面积的平均测量值存在显著差异,妊娠女性的直径大于非妊娠女性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sonographic Changes in Median Nerve Diameter in Pregnant Women: An Indicator of Carpel Tunnel Syndrome

Sonographic Changes in Median Nerve Diameter in Pregnant Women: An Indicator of Carpel Tunnel Syndrome

Previous research suggested that physiological changes occurring during pregnancy, such as fluid retention and hormonal fluctuations, might influence the dimensions of peripheral nerves. Understanding these potential differences is important for accurately interpreting sonographic findings and diagnosing conditions related to median nerve compression or entrapment in pregnant women. The objective of this study is to compare pregnant and non-pregnant females’ median nerve cross-sectional area. This case–control analytical study was conducted at the Department of Radiology, Imran Idrees Hospital, Sialkot, for 9 months. A convenient sampling technique was used to collect the data. The calculated sample size was 155, comprising 76 pregnant and 79 non-pregnant females. Inclusion criteria: For cases: symptomatic and asymptomatic pregnant women in their third trimester aged between 18 and 45 years. For controls: non-pregnant women within the same age group without any symptoms of CTS were taken as the control group. One hundred and 55 females were included. Pregnant females had a larger median nerve in the right hand (13.13 mm2) compared to non-pregnant females (11.75 mm2), with a significant difference (P = 0.000). Similarly, pregnant females also had a larger median nerve in the left hand (12.83 mm2) compared to non-pregnant females (11.72 mm2), with a significant difference (P = 0.000). There was no significant difference in echogenicity between pregnant and non-pregnant females. The results suggest significant differences in mean measurements between pregnant and non-pregnant groups for both right- and left-hand median nerve cross-sectional areas, with a larger diameter in pregnant females than non-pregnant females.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信