单性蛾类 Lobesia botrana 的战略性射精分配:雌性体型、雄性体型及其交互影响

IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Luis M. Torres-Vila
{"title":"单性蛾类 Lobesia botrana 的战略性射精分配:雌性体型、雄性体型及其交互影响","authors":"Luis M. Torres-Vila","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03507-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Experimental research and theoretical models question the Darwin-Bateman paradigm that male reproductive success is just limited by the number of mates. Males have evolved tactics to tailor ejaculates among their mates to maximise fitness. Males are expected to be choosy and to bias ejaculate investment depending on the perceived quality of females (cryptic male choice) and/or the reproductive social context. We investigated ejaculate allocation strategy in <i>Lobesia botrana</i>, a mostly monandrous moth, depending on male size, female size, and their interaction, the latter effect being usually overlooked in most studies. The explained variables were absolute ejaculate size (spermatophore volume) and relative ejaculate size (ejaculate size to lifetime ejaculate expenditure ratio). Absolute ejaculate allocation analysis showed that: (1) ejaculate expenditure increases with male size; (2) males tailor greater ejaculates to larger than smaller females; and (3) there was no interaction between male size and female size, so small and large males tailored equivalent increases in ejaculate volume per female weight unit. Quite differently, relative ejaculate allocation analysis showed that: (1) small males invest comparatively more than large males in females of similar size; and (2) there was an interaction between female size and male size, so small males invest comparatively more than large males when mated with large females. Results are discussed in the framework of strategic ejaculate allocation from an evolutionary perspective, as ecological variables, including the current climate change scenario, may promote coexistence in the field of quite different-sized adults in this moth species.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic ejaculate allocation in the mostly monandrous moth Lobesia botrana: female size, male size, and their interaction effects\",\"authors\":\"Luis M. Torres-Vila\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00265-024-03507-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Experimental research and theoretical models question the Darwin-Bateman paradigm that male reproductive success is just limited by the number of mates. Males have evolved tactics to tailor ejaculates among their mates to maximise fitness. Males are expected to be choosy and to bias ejaculate investment depending on the perceived quality of females (cryptic male choice) and/or the reproductive social context. We investigated ejaculate allocation strategy in <i>Lobesia botrana</i>, a mostly monandrous moth, depending on male size, female size, and their interaction, the latter effect being usually overlooked in most studies. The explained variables were absolute ejaculate size (spermatophore volume) and relative ejaculate size (ejaculate size to lifetime ejaculate expenditure ratio). Absolute ejaculate allocation analysis showed that: (1) ejaculate expenditure increases with male size; (2) males tailor greater ejaculates to larger than smaller females; and (3) there was no interaction between male size and female size, so small and large males tailored equivalent increases in ejaculate volume per female weight unit. Quite differently, relative ejaculate allocation analysis showed that: (1) small males invest comparatively more than large males in females of similar size; and (2) there was an interaction between female size and male size, so small males invest comparatively more than large males when mated with large females. Results are discussed in the framework of strategic ejaculate allocation from an evolutionary perspective, as ecological variables, including the current climate change scenario, may promote coexistence in the field of quite different-sized adults in this moth species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03507-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03507-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实验研究和理论模型对达尔文-贝特曼范式提出了质疑,该范式认为雄性的生殖成功仅仅受到配偶数量的限制。雄性已经进化出了在配偶间调整射精量的策略,以最大限度地提高适配性。预计雄性会挑三拣四,并根据对雌性质量的感知(隐性雄性选择)和/或生殖社会环境而偏向射精投资。我们研究了Lobesia botrana(一种主要为单性的蛾类)的射精分配策略,该策略取决于雄性的体型、雌性的体型以及它们之间的相互作用。被解释的变量是绝对射精量(精子体积)和相对射精量(射精量与终生射精量支出比)。射精量绝对分配分析表明(1)射精支出随雄性体型的增加而增加;(2)雄性向体型较大的雌性射出的精子比体型较小的雌性多;(3)雄性体型与雌性体型之间不存在交互作用,因此体型小的雄性和体型大的雄性为每单位体重的雌性量身定制的射精量增加相同。与此截然不同的是,相对射精分配分析表明(1) 在雌性体型相近的情况下,小型雄性比大型雄性的射精量相对较多;(2) 雌性体型与雄性体型之间存在交互作用,因此当小型雄性与大型雌性交配时,小型雄性比大型雄性的射精量相对较多。本研究从进化的角度,在射精量战略分配的框架内对结果进行了讨论,因为生态变量(包括当前的气候变化情景)可能会促进这种蛾类中大小迥异的成虫在野外共存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Strategic ejaculate allocation in the mostly monandrous moth Lobesia botrana: female size, male size, and their interaction effects

Strategic ejaculate allocation in the mostly monandrous moth Lobesia botrana: female size, male size, and their interaction effects

Experimental research and theoretical models question the Darwin-Bateman paradigm that male reproductive success is just limited by the number of mates. Males have evolved tactics to tailor ejaculates among their mates to maximise fitness. Males are expected to be choosy and to bias ejaculate investment depending on the perceived quality of females (cryptic male choice) and/or the reproductive social context. We investigated ejaculate allocation strategy in Lobesia botrana, a mostly monandrous moth, depending on male size, female size, and their interaction, the latter effect being usually overlooked in most studies. The explained variables were absolute ejaculate size (spermatophore volume) and relative ejaculate size (ejaculate size to lifetime ejaculate expenditure ratio). Absolute ejaculate allocation analysis showed that: (1) ejaculate expenditure increases with male size; (2) males tailor greater ejaculates to larger than smaller females; and (3) there was no interaction between male size and female size, so small and large males tailored equivalent increases in ejaculate volume per female weight unit. Quite differently, relative ejaculate allocation analysis showed that: (1) small males invest comparatively more than large males in females of similar size; and (2) there was an interaction between female size and male size, so small males invest comparatively more than large males when mated with large females. Results are discussed in the framework of strategic ejaculate allocation from an evolutionary perspective, as ecological variables, including the current climate change scenario, may promote coexistence in the field of quite different-sized adults in this moth species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal publishes reviews, original contributions and commentaries dealing with quantitative empirical and theoretical studies in the analysis of animal behavior at the level of the individual, group, population, community, and species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信