超越底线:评估兼顾残疾问题的社会企业的社会投资回报率

IF 2.8 Q2 BUSINESS
Claire Hutchinson, Leanne Lester, Veronica Coram, Paul Flatau, Ian Goodwin-Smith
{"title":"超越底线:评估兼顾残疾问题的社会企业的社会投资回报率","authors":"Claire Hutchinson, Leanne Lester, Veronica Coram, Paul Flatau, Ian Goodwin-Smith","doi":"10.1108/sej-08-2023-0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Though qualitative evidence of social impact exists for disability-inclusive social enterprise, there is a dearth of quantitative economic impact on their social impact. This study aims to address this gap and investigate the appropriateness and usefulness of social return on investment (SROI) methodology in this context.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Primary data was collected from people with disabilities, their families, staff at the parent company (an Australian Disability Enterprise [ADE]), social investors and other key stakeholders (<em>n</em> = 17). The study was also informed by the literature and a steering group to provide expert opinion when no other data existed to inform estimates. Sensitivity analysis was performed to check the robustness of the analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Social return was estimated at $1.47–$2.65 for every $1 invested (over 3 years) and $8.48–$12.63 (20 years). Some forecast assumptions significantly impacted upon final ratios and need to be tested. How SROI ratios are received by social investors, the ADE sector and government remains untested. However, the political climate suggests ADEs adopting social enterprise models will be well received if they can deliver, and demonstrate through robust measurement, sustainable open employment opportunities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Few studies exist that estimate the social impact of social enterprises supporting open employment of people with disabilities. At a time when ADEs (sheltered workshops) have been heavily criticised for providing repetitive, menial work for top up wages on welfare payments, the outputs from this research may provide valuable data to an ADE sector in transition as well as social investors and policy makers who increasingly require robust measurement of impact.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46809,"journal":{"name":"Social Enterprise Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the bottom line: assessing the social return on investment of a disability-inclusive social enterprise\",\"authors\":\"Claire Hutchinson, Leanne Lester, Veronica Coram, Paul Flatau, Ian Goodwin-Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sej-08-2023-0101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Though qualitative evidence of social impact exists for disability-inclusive social enterprise, there is a dearth of quantitative economic impact on their social impact. This study aims to address this gap and investigate the appropriateness and usefulness of social return on investment (SROI) methodology in this context.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Primary data was collected from people with disabilities, their families, staff at the parent company (an Australian Disability Enterprise [ADE]), social investors and other key stakeholders (<em>n</em> = 17). The study was also informed by the literature and a steering group to provide expert opinion when no other data existed to inform estimates. Sensitivity analysis was performed to check the robustness of the analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Social return was estimated at $1.47–$2.65 for every $1 invested (over 3 years) and $8.48–$12.63 (20 years). Some forecast assumptions significantly impacted upon final ratios and need to be tested. How SROI ratios are received by social investors, the ADE sector and government remains untested. However, the political climate suggests ADEs adopting social enterprise models will be well received if they can deliver, and demonstrate through robust measurement, sustainable open employment opportunities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Few studies exist that estimate the social impact of social enterprises supporting open employment of people with disabilities. At a time when ADEs (sheltered workshops) have been heavily criticised for providing repetitive, menial work for top up wages on welfare payments, the outputs from this research may provide valuable data to an ADE sector in transition as well as social investors and policy makers who increasingly require robust measurement of impact.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":46809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Enterprise Journal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Enterprise Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-08-2023-0101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Enterprise Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-08-2023-0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的虽然有定性证据表明兼顾残疾问题的社会企业对社会产生了影响,但缺乏对其社会影响的定量经济影响。本研究旨在填补这一空白,并调查社会投资回报(SROI)方法在此背景下的适当性和实用性。设计/方法/途径从残疾人、其家人、母公司(澳大利亚残疾人企业 [ADE])员工、社会投资者和其他主要利益相关者(n = 17)处收集主要数据。研究还参考了文献和指导小组的意见,以便在没有其他数据可供估算时提供专家意见。进行了敏感性分析,以检查分析的稳健性。研究结果据估计,每投资 1 美元,社会回报为 1.47 美元至 2.65 美元(3 年),8.48 美元至 12.63 美元(20 年)。一些预测假设对最终比率有重大影响,需要进行测试。社会投资者、ADE 部门和政府如何接受 SROI 比率仍有待检验。然而,政治气候表明,如果采用社会企业模式的 ADE 能够提供可持续的开放式就业机会,并通过可靠的测量加以证明,那么这些 ADE 将会受到欢迎。在 ADE(庇护工场)因提供重复性、琐碎的工作以获取福利补贴而饱受批评之际,本研究的成果可能会为处于转型期的 ADE 行业以及越来越需要对社会影响进行稳健衡量的社会投资者和政策制定者提供有价值的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the bottom line: assessing the social return on investment of a disability-inclusive social enterprise

Purpose

Though qualitative evidence of social impact exists for disability-inclusive social enterprise, there is a dearth of quantitative economic impact on their social impact. This study aims to address this gap and investigate the appropriateness and usefulness of social return on investment (SROI) methodology in this context.

Design/methodology/approach

Primary data was collected from people with disabilities, their families, staff at the parent company (an Australian Disability Enterprise [ADE]), social investors and other key stakeholders (n = 17). The study was also informed by the literature and a steering group to provide expert opinion when no other data existed to inform estimates. Sensitivity analysis was performed to check the robustness of the analysis.

Findings

Social return was estimated at $1.47–$2.65 for every $1 invested (over 3 years) and $8.48–$12.63 (20 years). Some forecast assumptions significantly impacted upon final ratios and need to be tested. How SROI ratios are received by social investors, the ADE sector and government remains untested. However, the political climate suggests ADEs adopting social enterprise models will be well received if they can deliver, and demonstrate through robust measurement, sustainable open employment opportunities.

Originality/value

Few studies exist that estimate the social impact of social enterprises supporting open employment of people with disabilities. At a time when ADEs (sheltered workshops) have been heavily criticised for providing repetitive, menial work for top up wages on welfare payments, the outputs from this research may provide valuable data to an ADE sector in transition as well as social investors and policy makers who increasingly require robust measurement of impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信