Avijit Ghosh, Tomo Lazovich, Kristian Lum, Christo Wilson
{"title":"减少人口层面的不平等可以改善人口群体的公平性:推特案例研究","authors":"Avijit Ghosh, Tomo Lazovich, Kristian Lum, Christo Wilson","doi":"arxiv-2409.08135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many existing fairness metrics measure group-wise demographic disparities in\nsystem behavior or model performance. Calculating these metrics requires access\nto demographic information, which, in industrial settings, is often\nunavailable. By contrast, economic inequality metrics, such as the Gini\ncoefficient, require no demographic data to measure. However, reductions in\neconomic inequality do not necessarily correspond to reductions in demographic\ndisparities. In this paper, we empirically explore the relationship between\ndemographic-free inequality metrics -- such as the Gini coefficient -- and\nstandard demographic bias metrics that measure group-wise model performance\ndisparities specifically in the case of engagement inequality on Twitter. We\nanalyze tweets from 174K users over the duration of 2021 and find that\ndemographic-free impression inequality metrics are positively correlated with\ngender, race, and age disparities in the average case, and weakly (but still\npositively) correlated with demographic bias in the worst case. We therefore\nrecommend inequality metrics as a potentially useful proxy measure of average\ngroup-wise disparities, especially in cases where such disparities cannot be\nmeasured directly. Based on these results, we believe they can be used as part\nof broader efforts to improve fairness between demographic groups in scenarios\nlike content recommendation on social media.","PeriodicalId":501032,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing Population-level Inequality Can Improve Demographic Group Fairness: a Twitter Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Avijit Ghosh, Tomo Lazovich, Kristian Lum, Christo Wilson\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.08135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many existing fairness metrics measure group-wise demographic disparities in\\nsystem behavior or model performance. Calculating these metrics requires access\\nto demographic information, which, in industrial settings, is often\\nunavailable. By contrast, economic inequality metrics, such as the Gini\\ncoefficient, require no demographic data to measure. However, reductions in\\neconomic inequality do not necessarily correspond to reductions in demographic\\ndisparities. In this paper, we empirically explore the relationship between\\ndemographic-free inequality metrics -- such as the Gini coefficient -- and\\nstandard demographic bias metrics that measure group-wise model performance\\ndisparities specifically in the case of engagement inequality on Twitter. We\\nanalyze tweets from 174K users over the duration of 2021 and find that\\ndemographic-free impression inequality metrics are positively correlated with\\ngender, race, and age disparities in the average case, and weakly (but still\\npositively) correlated with demographic bias in the worst case. We therefore\\nrecommend inequality metrics as a potentially useful proxy measure of average\\ngroup-wise disparities, especially in cases where such disparities cannot be\\nmeasured directly. Based on these results, we believe they can be used as part\\nof broader efforts to improve fairness between demographic groups in scenarios\\nlike content recommendation on social media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reducing Population-level Inequality Can Improve Demographic Group Fairness: a Twitter Case Study
Many existing fairness metrics measure group-wise demographic disparities in
system behavior or model performance. Calculating these metrics requires access
to demographic information, which, in industrial settings, is often
unavailable. By contrast, economic inequality metrics, such as the Gini
coefficient, require no demographic data to measure. However, reductions in
economic inequality do not necessarily correspond to reductions in demographic
disparities. In this paper, we empirically explore the relationship between
demographic-free inequality metrics -- such as the Gini coefficient -- and
standard demographic bias metrics that measure group-wise model performance
disparities specifically in the case of engagement inequality on Twitter. We
analyze tweets from 174K users over the duration of 2021 and find that
demographic-free impression inequality metrics are positively correlated with
gender, race, and age disparities in the average case, and weakly (but still
positively) correlated with demographic bias in the worst case. We therefore
recommend inequality metrics as a potentially useful proxy measure of average
group-wise disparities, especially in cases where such disparities cannot be
measured directly. Based on these results, we believe they can be used as part
of broader efforts to improve fairness between demographic groups in scenarios
like content recommendation on social media.