比较气候驱动因素对德国青贮玉米产量冲击的影响

IF 2.8 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Federico Stainoh, Julia Moemken, Celia M. Gouveia, Joaquim G. Pinto
{"title":"比较气候驱动因素对德国青贮玉米产量冲击的影响","authors":"Federico Stainoh, Julia Moemken, Celia M. Gouveia, Joaquim G. Pinto","doi":"10.1007/s00704-024-05179-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Extreme weather events have become more frequent and severe with ongoing climate change, with a huge implication for the agricultural sector and detrimental effects on crop yield. In this study, we compare several combinations of climate indices and utilized the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) to explain the probabilities of substantial drops in silage maize yield (here defined as “yield shock” by using a 15th percentile as threshold) in Germany between 1999 and 2020. We compare the variable importance and the predictability skill of six combinations of climate indices using the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Finally, we delve into year-to-year predictions by comparing them against the historical series and examining the variables contributing to high and low predicted yield shock probabilities. We find that cold conditions during April and hot and/or dry conditions during July increase the chance of silage maize yield shock. Moreover, a combination of simple variables (e.g. total precipitation) and complex variables (e.g. cumulative cold under cold nights) enhances predictive accuracy. Lastly, we find that the years with higher predicted yield shock probabilities are characterized mainly by relatively hotter and drier conditions during July compared to years with lower yield shock probabilities. Our findings enhance our understanding of how weather impacts maize crop yield shocks and underscore the importance of considering complex variables and using effective selection methods, particularly when addressing climate-related events.</p>","PeriodicalId":22945,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Applied Climatology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of climate drivers’ impacts on silage maize yield shock in Germany\",\"authors\":\"Federico Stainoh, Julia Moemken, Celia M. Gouveia, Joaquim G. Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00704-024-05179-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Extreme weather events have become more frequent and severe with ongoing climate change, with a huge implication for the agricultural sector and detrimental effects on crop yield. In this study, we compare several combinations of climate indices and utilized the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) to explain the probabilities of substantial drops in silage maize yield (here defined as “yield shock” by using a 15th percentile as threshold) in Germany between 1999 and 2020. We compare the variable importance and the predictability skill of six combinations of climate indices using the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Finally, we delve into year-to-year predictions by comparing them against the historical series and examining the variables contributing to high and low predicted yield shock probabilities. We find that cold conditions during April and hot and/or dry conditions during July increase the chance of silage maize yield shock. Moreover, a combination of simple variables (e.g. total precipitation) and complex variables (e.g. cumulative cold under cold nights) enhances predictive accuracy. Lastly, we find that the years with higher predicted yield shock probabilities are characterized mainly by relatively hotter and drier conditions during July compared to years with lower yield shock probabilities. Our findings enhance our understanding of how weather impacts maize crop yield shocks and underscore the importance of considering complex variables and using effective selection methods, particularly when addressing climate-related events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical and Applied Climatology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical and Applied Climatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-024-05179-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Applied Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-024-05179-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着气候变化的不断加剧,极端天气事件变得更加频繁和严重,对农业部门造成了巨大影响,并对作物产量产生了不利影响。在本研究中,我们比较了几种气候指数组合,并利用最小绝对收缩和选择操作器(LASSO)解释了 1999 年至 2020 年期间德国青贮玉米产量大幅下降(此处以 15 百分位数为临界值定义为 "产量冲击")的概率。我们使用马修斯相关系数(MCC)比较了六个气候指数组合的变量重要性和预测能力。最后,我们深入研究了逐年预测,将其与历史序列进行比较,并研究了导致预测产量冲击概率高低的变量。我们发现,4 月份的寒冷条件和 7 月份的炎热和/或干燥条件会增加青贮玉米产量冲击的几率。此外,简单变量(如总降水量)和复杂变量(如寒冷夜晚下的累积低温)的结合也提高了预测的准确性。最后,我们发现,与产量冲击概率较低的年份相比,预测产量冲击概率较高的年份的主要特点是七月份相对更热、更干燥。我们的研究结果加深了我们对天气如何影响玉米作物产量冲击的理解,并强调了考虑复杂变量和使用有效选择方法的重要性,尤其是在处理与气候相关的事件时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A comparison of climate drivers’ impacts on silage maize yield shock in Germany

A comparison of climate drivers’ impacts on silage maize yield shock in Germany

Extreme weather events have become more frequent and severe with ongoing climate change, with a huge implication for the agricultural sector and detrimental effects on crop yield. In this study, we compare several combinations of climate indices and utilized the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) to explain the probabilities of substantial drops in silage maize yield (here defined as “yield shock” by using a 15th percentile as threshold) in Germany between 1999 and 2020. We compare the variable importance and the predictability skill of six combinations of climate indices using the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Finally, we delve into year-to-year predictions by comparing them against the historical series and examining the variables contributing to high and low predicted yield shock probabilities. We find that cold conditions during April and hot and/or dry conditions during July increase the chance of silage maize yield shock. Moreover, a combination of simple variables (e.g. total precipitation) and complex variables (e.g. cumulative cold under cold nights) enhances predictive accuracy. Lastly, we find that the years with higher predicted yield shock probabilities are characterized mainly by relatively hotter and drier conditions during July compared to years with lower yield shock probabilities. Our findings enhance our understanding of how weather impacts maize crop yield shocks and underscore the importance of considering complex variables and using effective selection methods, particularly when addressing climate-related events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Theoretical and Applied Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
376
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Theoretical and Applied Climatology covers the following topics: - climate modeling, climatic changes and climate forecasting, micro- to mesoclimate, applied meteorology as in agro- and forestmeteorology, biometeorology, building meteorology and atmospheric radiation problems as they relate to the biosphere - effects of anthropogenic and natural aerosols or gaseous trace constituents - hardware and software elements of meteorological measurements, including techniques of remote sensing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信