{"title":"抗癌抗生素 Trioxacarcin A 和 LL-D49194α1 的不同 DNA 结合和损伤模式","authors":"Ruo-Qin Gao, Xiao-Dong Hu, Qiang Zhou, Xian-Feng Hou, Chunyang Cao, Gong-Li Tang","doi":"10.1021/jacsau.4c00611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trioxacarcin A (TXN) is a highly potent cytotoxic antibiotic with remarkable structural complexity. The crystal structure of TXN bound to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) suggested that the TXN interaction might depend on positions of two sugar subunits on the minor and major grooves of dsDNA. LL-D49194α1 (LLD) is a TXN analogue bearing the same polycyclic polyketide scaffold with a distinct glycosylation pattern. Although LLD was in a phase I clinical trial, how LLD binds to dsDNA remains unclear. Here, we solved the solution structures at high resolutions of palindromic 2″-fluorine-labeled guanine-containing duplex d(A<sub>1</sub>A<sub>2</sub>C<sub>3</sub>C<sub>4</sub>G<sup>F</sup>G<sup>F</sup>T<sub>7</sub>T<sub>8</sub>)<sub>2</sub> and of its stable LLD and TXN covalently bound complexes. Combined with biochemical assays, we found that TXN-alkylated dsDNA would tend to keep DNA helix conformation, while LLD-alkylated dsDNA lost its stability more than TXN-alkylated dsDNA, leading to dsDNA denaturation. Thus, despite lower cytotoxicity in vitro, the differences of sugar substitutions in LLD caused greater DNA damage than TXN, thereby bringing about a completely new biological effect.","PeriodicalId":14799,"journal":{"name":"JACS Au","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different DNA Binding and Damage Mode between Anticancer Antibiotics Trioxacarcin A and LL-D49194α1\",\"authors\":\"Ruo-Qin Gao, Xiao-Dong Hu, Qiang Zhou, Xian-Feng Hou, Chunyang Cao, Gong-Li Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/jacsau.4c00611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trioxacarcin A (TXN) is a highly potent cytotoxic antibiotic with remarkable structural complexity. The crystal structure of TXN bound to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) suggested that the TXN interaction might depend on positions of two sugar subunits on the minor and major grooves of dsDNA. LL-D49194α1 (LLD) is a TXN analogue bearing the same polycyclic polyketide scaffold with a distinct glycosylation pattern. Although LLD was in a phase I clinical trial, how LLD binds to dsDNA remains unclear. Here, we solved the solution structures at high resolutions of palindromic 2″-fluorine-labeled guanine-containing duplex d(A<sub>1</sub>A<sub>2</sub>C<sub>3</sub>C<sub>4</sub>G<sup>F</sup>G<sup>F</sup>T<sub>7</sub>T<sub>8</sub>)<sub>2</sub> and of its stable LLD and TXN covalently bound complexes. Combined with biochemical assays, we found that TXN-alkylated dsDNA would tend to keep DNA helix conformation, while LLD-alkylated dsDNA lost its stability more than TXN-alkylated dsDNA, leading to dsDNA denaturation. Thus, despite lower cytotoxicity in vitro, the differences of sugar substitutions in LLD caused greater DNA damage than TXN, thereby bringing about a completely new biological effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACS Au\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACS Au\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.4c00611\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACS Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.4c00611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Different DNA Binding and Damage Mode between Anticancer Antibiotics Trioxacarcin A and LL-D49194α1
Trioxacarcin A (TXN) is a highly potent cytotoxic antibiotic with remarkable structural complexity. The crystal structure of TXN bound to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) suggested that the TXN interaction might depend on positions of two sugar subunits on the minor and major grooves of dsDNA. LL-D49194α1 (LLD) is a TXN analogue bearing the same polycyclic polyketide scaffold with a distinct glycosylation pattern. Although LLD was in a phase I clinical trial, how LLD binds to dsDNA remains unclear. Here, we solved the solution structures at high resolutions of palindromic 2″-fluorine-labeled guanine-containing duplex d(A1A2C3C4GFGFT7T8)2 and of its stable LLD and TXN covalently bound complexes. Combined with biochemical assays, we found that TXN-alkylated dsDNA would tend to keep DNA helix conformation, while LLD-alkylated dsDNA lost its stability more than TXN-alkylated dsDNA, leading to dsDNA denaturation. Thus, despite lower cytotoxicity in vitro, the differences of sugar substitutions in LLD caused greater DNA damage than TXN, thereby bringing about a completely new biological effect.