Dário Macedo Lima, Adriano Rolim da Paz, Yunqing Xuan, Daniel Gustavo Allasia Piccilli
{"title":"利用基于 DEM 的新分布式方法将空间可变性纳入地表径流建模","authors":"Dário Macedo Lima, Adriano Rolim da Paz, Yunqing Xuan, Daniel Gustavo Allasia Piccilli","doi":"10.1007/s10596-024-10321-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study introduces two novel DEM-based distributed rainfall-runoff models derived from the existing Hidropixel model: Hidropixel<sub>TUH+</sub> and Hidropixel<sub>DLR</sub>. These models account for spatial variations in direct runoff generation, translation, and storage within a watershed, considering spatial variability in rainfall and basin characteristics. In Hidropixel<sub>TUH+</sub>, a Triangular Unit Hydrograph (TUH) is determined for each Digital Elevation Model (DEM) pixel and lagged to the watershed outlet based on the travel time from the pixel to the outlet. In Hidropixel<sub>DLR</sub>, a hydrograph is estimated for each pixel based on the travel time, which takes translation effects into account. To represent the storage effects, this hydrograph is attenuated by a linear reservoir at each pixel. Both approaches were applied to the Upper Medway catchment (250 km<sup>2</sup>) in southeastern England, using rainfall data from a rain gauge network. The outcomes revealed that the proposed approaches provided a reasonably accurate prediction of the hydrographs and exhibited notably superior performance compared to the original version of Hidropixel, which has limited capabilities in capturing translation effects. Hidropixel<sub>TUH+</sub> and Hidropixel<sub>DLR</sub> predicted peak flows with an average absolute error of 11% and 10%, respectively. The Hidropixel<sub>DLR</sub> achieved a more accurate time-to-peak estimation, with an average absolute error of 1 h, compared to the 1.5-h error from Hidropixel<sub>TUH+</sub>. Additionally, the Hidropixel<sub>DLR</sub> predicted the full direct runoff hydrograph more accurately, achieving an average Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (<i>NSE</i>) of 0.89, while the Hidropixel<sub>TUH+</sub> had an <i>NSE</i> of approximately 0.84.</p>","PeriodicalId":10662,"journal":{"name":"Computational Geosciences","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating spatial variability in surface runoff modeling with new DEM-based distributed approaches\",\"authors\":\"Dário Macedo Lima, Adriano Rolim da Paz, Yunqing Xuan, Daniel Gustavo Allasia Piccilli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10596-024-10321-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study introduces two novel DEM-based distributed rainfall-runoff models derived from the existing Hidropixel model: Hidropixel<sub>TUH+</sub> and Hidropixel<sub>DLR</sub>. These models account for spatial variations in direct runoff generation, translation, and storage within a watershed, considering spatial variability in rainfall and basin characteristics. In Hidropixel<sub>TUH+</sub>, a Triangular Unit Hydrograph (TUH) is determined for each Digital Elevation Model (DEM) pixel and lagged to the watershed outlet based on the travel time from the pixel to the outlet. In Hidropixel<sub>DLR</sub>, a hydrograph is estimated for each pixel based on the travel time, which takes translation effects into account. To represent the storage effects, this hydrograph is attenuated by a linear reservoir at each pixel. Both approaches were applied to the Upper Medway catchment (250 km<sup>2</sup>) in southeastern England, using rainfall data from a rain gauge network. The outcomes revealed that the proposed approaches provided a reasonably accurate prediction of the hydrographs and exhibited notably superior performance compared to the original version of Hidropixel, which has limited capabilities in capturing translation effects. Hidropixel<sub>TUH+</sub> and Hidropixel<sub>DLR</sub> predicted peak flows with an average absolute error of 11% and 10%, respectively. The Hidropixel<sub>DLR</sub> achieved a more accurate time-to-peak estimation, with an average absolute error of 1 h, compared to the 1.5-h error from Hidropixel<sub>TUH+</sub>. Additionally, the Hidropixel<sub>DLR</sub> predicted the full direct runoff hydrograph more accurately, achieving an average Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (<i>NSE</i>) of 0.89, while the Hidropixel<sub>TUH+</sub> had an <i>NSE</i> of approximately 0.84.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Geosciences\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-024-10321-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-024-10321-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incorporating spatial variability in surface runoff modeling with new DEM-based distributed approaches
This study introduces two novel DEM-based distributed rainfall-runoff models derived from the existing Hidropixel model: HidropixelTUH+ and HidropixelDLR. These models account for spatial variations in direct runoff generation, translation, and storage within a watershed, considering spatial variability in rainfall and basin characteristics. In HidropixelTUH+, a Triangular Unit Hydrograph (TUH) is determined for each Digital Elevation Model (DEM) pixel and lagged to the watershed outlet based on the travel time from the pixel to the outlet. In HidropixelDLR, a hydrograph is estimated for each pixel based on the travel time, which takes translation effects into account. To represent the storage effects, this hydrograph is attenuated by a linear reservoir at each pixel. Both approaches were applied to the Upper Medway catchment (250 km2) in southeastern England, using rainfall data from a rain gauge network. The outcomes revealed that the proposed approaches provided a reasonably accurate prediction of the hydrographs and exhibited notably superior performance compared to the original version of Hidropixel, which has limited capabilities in capturing translation effects. HidropixelTUH+ and HidropixelDLR predicted peak flows with an average absolute error of 11% and 10%, respectively. The HidropixelDLR achieved a more accurate time-to-peak estimation, with an average absolute error of 1 h, compared to the 1.5-h error from HidropixelTUH+. Additionally, the HidropixelDLR predicted the full direct runoff hydrograph more accurately, achieving an average Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE) of 0.89, while the HidropixelTUH+ had an NSE of approximately 0.84.
期刊介绍:
Computational Geosciences publishes high quality papers on mathematical modeling, simulation, numerical analysis, and other computational aspects of the geosciences. In particular the journal is focused on advanced numerical methods for the simulation of subsurface flow and transport, and associated aspects such as discretization, gridding, upscaling, optimization, data assimilation, uncertainty assessment, and high performance parallel and grid computing.
Papers treating similar topics but with applications to other fields in the geosciences, such as geomechanics, geophysics, oceanography, or meteorology, will also be considered.
The journal provides a platform for interaction and multidisciplinary collaboration among diverse scientific groups, from both academia and industry, which share an interest in developing mathematical models and efficient algorithms for solving them, such as mathematicians, engineers, chemists, physicists, and geoscientists.