在抗疟药物试验中用多重纳米孔扩增片段测序法区分复发和新发感染

Aurel Holzschuh, Anita Lerch, Christian Nsanzabana
{"title":"在抗疟药物试验中用多重纳米孔扩增片段测序法区分复发和新发感染","authors":"Aurel Holzschuh, Anita Lerch, Christian Nsanzabana","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.11.612449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThe assessment of antimalarial drug efficacy against <em>Plasmodium falciparum</em> requires PCR correction to distinguish recrudescence from new infections by comparing parasite genotypes before treatment and in recurrent infections. Nanopore sequencing offers a low-cost, portable, scalable, and rapid alternative to traditional methods, supporting the expansion and decentralization of sequencing in endemic, resource-limited settings, potentially providing rapid PCR-corrected drug failure estimates.\nMethods\nWe optimized a multiplexed AmpSeq panel targeting six microhaplotypes for high and uniform coverage. We assessed sensitivity and specificity for detecting minority clones in polyclonal infections and evaluated genetic diversity across the microhaplotype markers. We used mixtures of four <em>P. falciparum</em> laboratory strains at different ratios and 20 paired patient samples from a clinical trial. A custom bioinformatics workflow was used to infer haplotypes from polyclonal infections, including minority clones, with defined cut-off criteria for accurate haplotype calling.\nFindings\nThe nanopore AmpSeq assay achieved uniform and high read coverage across all six microhaplotype markers (median coverage: 12,989x to 15,440x for laboratory strain mixtures and 7,011x to 11,600x for patients' samples, respectively). We found high sensitivity in detecting minority clones (up to 50:1:1:1 in the 3D7:K1:HB3:FCB1 laboratory strain mixtures) and high specificity with less than 0.01% of all reads being false-positive haplotypes. Genetic diversity in the markers used was high (H<sub>E</sub> ≥ 0.98 and up to 31 unique haplotypes in 20 paired samples with <em>cpmp</em>), and concordant results in classifying new infections and recrudescence across all markers used were observed in 18 (90%) of 20 paired samples. Interpretation\nOur study demonstrates the feasibility of nanopore AmpSeq for distinguishing recrudescence from new infections in clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":501108,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Molecular Biology","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiplexed nanopore amplicon sequencing to distinguish recrudescence from new infection in antimalarial drug trials\",\"authors\":\"Aurel Holzschuh, Anita Lerch, Christian Nsanzabana\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.11.612449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nThe assessment of antimalarial drug efficacy against <em>Plasmodium falciparum</em> requires PCR correction to distinguish recrudescence from new infections by comparing parasite genotypes before treatment and in recurrent infections. Nanopore sequencing offers a low-cost, portable, scalable, and rapid alternative to traditional methods, supporting the expansion and decentralization of sequencing in endemic, resource-limited settings, potentially providing rapid PCR-corrected drug failure estimates.\\nMethods\\nWe optimized a multiplexed AmpSeq panel targeting six microhaplotypes for high and uniform coverage. We assessed sensitivity and specificity for detecting minority clones in polyclonal infections and evaluated genetic diversity across the microhaplotype markers. We used mixtures of four <em>P. falciparum</em> laboratory strains at different ratios and 20 paired patient samples from a clinical trial. A custom bioinformatics workflow was used to infer haplotypes from polyclonal infections, including minority clones, with defined cut-off criteria for accurate haplotype calling.\\nFindings\\nThe nanopore AmpSeq assay achieved uniform and high read coverage across all six microhaplotype markers (median coverage: 12,989x to 15,440x for laboratory strain mixtures and 7,011x to 11,600x for patients' samples, respectively). We found high sensitivity in detecting minority clones (up to 50:1:1:1 in the 3D7:K1:HB3:FCB1 laboratory strain mixtures) and high specificity with less than 0.01% of all reads being false-positive haplotypes. Genetic diversity in the markers used was high (H<sub>E</sub> ≥ 0.98 and up to 31 unique haplotypes in 20 paired samples with <em>cpmp</em>), and concordant results in classifying new infections and recrudescence across all markers used were observed in 18 (90%) of 20 paired samples. Interpretation\\nOur study demonstrates the feasibility of nanopore AmpSeq for distinguishing recrudescence from new infections in clinical trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Molecular Biology\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Molecular Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.11.612449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.11.612449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对恶性疟原虫的抗疟药物疗效评估需要进行 PCR 校正,以便通过比较治疗前和复发感染时的寄生虫基因型来区分复发和新感染。纳米孔测序为传统方法提供了一种低成本、便携式、可扩展和快速的替代方法,支持在地方病流行、资源有限的环境中扩大和分散测序,并有可能快速提供经 PCR 校正的药物失效估计值。我们评估了在多克隆感染中检测少数克隆的灵敏度和特异性,并评估了微单体型标记物的遗传多样性。我们使用了四种不同比例的恶性疟原虫实验室菌株混合物和 20 份来自临床试验的配对患者样本。研究结果纳米孔 AmpSeq 分析在所有六个微单倍型标记物上实现了均匀且高的读数覆盖率(中位数覆盖率:12,989x 至 15,989 x):实验室菌株混合物的中位覆盖率为 12,989x 至 15,440x,患者样本的中位覆盖率为 7,011x 至 11,600x)。我们发现,检测少数克隆的灵敏度很高(3D7:K1:HB3:FCB1 实验室菌株混合物的灵敏度可达 50:1:1:1),特异性也很高,所有读数中假阳性单倍型的比例不到 0.01%。所用标记物的遗传多样性很高(HE≥ 0.98,在 20 个使用 cpmp 的配对样本中有多达 31 个独特的单倍型),在 20 个配对样本中有 18 个(90%)在对新感染和复发进行分类时观察到所有所用标记物的结果一致。释义我们的研究证明了纳米孔 AmpSeq 在临床试验中区分复发和新感染的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiplexed nanopore amplicon sequencing to distinguish recrudescence from new infection in antimalarial drug trials
Background The assessment of antimalarial drug efficacy against Plasmodium falciparum requires PCR correction to distinguish recrudescence from new infections by comparing parasite genotypes before treatment and in recurrent infections. Nanopore sequencing offers a low-cost, portable, scalable, and rapid alternative to traditional methods, supporting the expansion and decentralization of sequencing in endemic, resource-limited settings, potentially providing rapid PCR-corrected drug failure estimates. Methods We optimized a multiplexed AmpSeq panel targeting six microhaplotypes for high and uniform coverage. We assessed sensitivity and specificity for detecting minority clones in polyclonal infections and evaluated genetic diversity across the microhaplotype markers. We used mixtures of four P. falciparum laboratory strains at different ratios and 20 paired patient samples from a clinical trial. A custom bioinformatics workflow was used to infer haplotypes from polyclonal infections, including minority clones, with defined cut-off criteria for accurate haplotype calling. Findings The nanopore AmpSeq assay achieved uniform and high read coverage across all six microhaplotype markers (median coverage: 12,989x to 15,440x for laboratory strain mixtures and 7,011x to 11,600x for patients' samples, respectively). We found high sensitivity in detecting minority clones (up to 50:1:1:1 in the 3D7:K1:HB3:FCB1 laboratory strain mixtures) and high specificity with less than 0.01% of all reads being false-positive haplotypes. Genetic diversity in the markers used was high (HE ≥ 0.98 and up to 31 unique haplotypes in 20 paired samples with cpmp), and concordant results in classifying new infections and recrudescence across all markers used were observed in 18 (90%) of 20 paired samples. Interpretation Our study demonstrates the feasibility of nanopore AmpSeq for distinguishing recrudescence from new infections in clinical trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信