Anne A. Innes-Gold, Paul Carvalho, Lisa C. McManus, Seaenna Correa-Garcia, Stacia D. Marcoux, Kirsten L. L. Oleson, Kaci Stokes, Elizabeth M. P. Madin
{"title":"模拟海面温度、捕捞作业和空间禁渔对珊瑚礁鱼类种群的交互影响","authors":"Anne A. Innes-Gold, Paul Carvalho, Lisa C. McManus, Seaenna Correa-Garcia, Stacia D. Marcoux, Kirsten L. L. Oleson, Kaci Stokes, Elizabeth M. P. Madin","doi":"10.1007/s12080-024-00591-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate change can affect reef fish both directly (e.g., mortality, growth, fecundity) and indirectly (e.g., habitat degradation). The extent to which the effects of rising water temperature could drive changes in fish populations and if and how these effects may interact with potential management interventions remain unclear. The objective of this study was to test various hypothesized mechanisms by which sea surface temperature (SST) could affect reef fish population dynamics and explore these effects in combination with fishing effort restrictions and spatial closures. To do this, we modeled hypothesized relationships between SST and two governing parameters of the fish populations: intrinsic growth rate (<i>r</i>) and carrying capacity (<i>K</i>). We coupled these temperature-dependent fish population models with a fisheries harvest model and explored interactions between thermal effects, fishing effort level, and spatial closures. Under small closure scenarios, we found that the thermal effects models predicted substantially lower fish population biomass and harvest compared to the baseline (constant <i>r</i> and <i>K</i>) model. Under large closure scenarios, the thermal effects models more closely resembled the baseline. Generally, incorporating spatial closures mitigated some of the detrimental thermal effects on fish biomass and allowed for increased harvest under certain fishing effort levels. Whether intrinsic growth or carrying capacity most affected fish population levels also depended on the fishing effort and the spatial closure area. Overall, we described how fishing effort and spatial closures can influence the relative importance of key processes and the extent to which rising water temperatures affect fish populations and harvest.</p>","PeriodicalId":51198,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Ecology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling the interactive effects of sea surface temperature, fishing effort, and spatial closures on reef fish populations\",\"authors\":\"Anne A. Innes-Gold, Paul Carvalho, Lisa C. McManus, Seaenna Correa-Garcia, Stacia D. Marcoux, Kirsten L. L. Oleson, Kaci Stokes, Elizabeth M. P. Madin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12080-024-00591-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Climate change can affect reef fish both directly (e.g., mortality, growth, fecundity) and indirectly (e.g., habitat degradation). The extent to which the effects of rising water temperature could drive changes in fish populations and if and how these effects may interact with potential management interventions remain unclear. The objective of this study was to test various hypothesized mechanisms by which sea surface temperature (SST) could affect reef fish population dynamics and explore these effects in combination with fishing effort restrictions and spatial closures. To do this, we modeled hypothesized relationships between SST and two governing parameters of the fish populations: intrinsic growth rate (<i>r</i>) and carrying capacity (<i>K</i>). We coupled these temperature-dependent fish population models with a fisheries harvest model and explored interactions between thermal effects, fishing effort level, and spatial closures. Under small closure scenarios, we found that the thermal effects models predicted substantially lower fish population biomass and harvest compared to the baseline (constant <i>r</i> and <i>K</i>) model. Under large closure scenarios, the thermal effects models more closely resembled the baseline. Generally, incorporating spatial closures mitigated some of the detrimental thermal effects on fish biomass and allowed for increased harvest under certain fishing effort levels. Whether intrinsic growth or carrying capacity most affected fish population levels also depended on the fishing effort and the spatial closure area. Overall, we described how fishing effort and spatial closures can influence the relative importance of key processes and the extent to which rising water temperatures affect fish populations and harvest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Ecology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-024-00591-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-024-00591-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
气候变化可直接(如死亡率、生长、繁殖力)或间接(如栖息地退化)影响珊瑚礁鱼类。水温上升对鱼类种群变化的影响程度,以及这些影响是否和如何与潜在的管理干预措施相互作用,目前仍不清楚。本研究的目的是检验海表温度(SST)可能影响珊瑚礁鱼类种群动态的各种假设机制,并探讨这些机制与捕捞强度限制和禁渔区的结合效应。为此,我们模拟了海表温度与鱼类种群两个管理参数之间的假设关系:内在增长率(r)和承载能力(K)。我们将这些与温度相关的鱼类种群模型与渔业捕捞模型结合起来,探索了热效应、捕捞强度和空间禁渔之间的相互作用。我们发现,在小规模关闭情况下,热效应模型预测的鱼类种群生物量和捕捞量大大低于基线模型(r 和 K 不变)。在大面积禁渔情况下,热效应模型更接近基线模型。一般来说,纳入空间闭合可减轻热效应对鱼类生物量的一些不利影响,并允许在一定捕捞强度下增加捕捞量。影响鱼类种群数量最多的是内在增长还是承载能力,还取决于捕捞强度和空间禁渔区。总之,我们介绍了捕捞强度和空间禁渔区如何影响关键过程的相对重要性以及水温上升对鱼类种群和捕捞的影响程度。
Modeling the interactive effects of sea surface temperature, fishing effort, and spatial closures on reef fish populations
Climate change can affect reef fish both directly (e.g., mortality, growth, fecundity) and indirectly (e.g., habitat degradation). The extent to which the effects of rising water temperature could drive changes in fish populations and if and how these effects may interact with potential management interventions remain unclear. The objective of this study was to test various hypothesized mechanisms by which sea surface temperature (SST) could affect reef fish population dynamics and explore these effects in combination with fishing effort restrictions and spatial closures. To do this, we modeled hypothesized relationships between SST and two governing parameters of the fish populations: intrinsic growth rate (r) and carrying capacity (K). We coupled these temperature-dependent fish population models with a fisheries harvest model and explored interactions between thermal effects, fishing effort level, and spatial closures. Under small closure scenarios, we found that the thermal effects models predicted substantially lower fish population biomass and harvest compared to the baseline (constant r and K) model. Under large closure scenarios, the thermal effects models more closely resembled the baseline. Generally, incorporating spatial closures mitigated some of the detrimental thermal effects on fish biomass and allowed for increased harvest under certain fishing effort levels. Whether intrinsic growth or carrying capacity most affected fish population levels also depended on the fishing effort and the spatial closure area. Overall, we described how fishing effort and spatial closures can influence the relative importance of key processes and the extent to which rising water temperatures affect fish populations and harvest.
期刊介绍:
Theoretical Ecology publishes innovative research in theoretical ecology, broadly defined. Papers should use theoretical approaches to answer questions of ecological interest and appeal to and be readable by a broad audience of ecologists. Work that uses mathematical, statistical, computational, or conceptual approaches is all welcomed, provided that the goal is to increase ecological understanding. Papers that only use existing approaches to analyze data, or are only mathematical analyses that do not further ecological understanding, are not appropriate. Work that bridges disciplinary boundaries, such as the intersection between quantitative social sciences and ecology, or physical influences on ecological processes, will also be particularly welcome.
All areas of theoretical ecology, including ecophysiology, population ecology, behavioral ecology, evolutionary ecology, ecosystem ecology, community ecology, and ecosystem and landscape ecology are all appropriate. Theoretical papers that focus on applied ecological questions are also of particular interest.