认知网络和性能利用 DNN 模型驱动基于 fMRI 的状态分类

Murat Kucukosmanoglu, Javier O. Garcia, Justin Brooks, Kanika Bansal
{"title":"认知网络和性能利用 DNN 模型驱动基于 fMRI 的状态分类","authors":"Murat Kucukosmanoglu, Javier O. Garcia, Justin Brooks, Kanika Bansal","doi":"arxiv-2409.00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep neural network (DNN) models have demonstrated impressive performance in\nvarious domains, yet their application in cognitive neuroscience is limited due\nto their lack of interpretability. In this study we employ two structurally\ndifferent and complementary DNN-based models, a one-dimensional convolutional\nneural network (1D-CNN) and a bidirectional long short-term memory network\n(BiLSTM), to classify individual cognitive states from fMRI BOLD data, with a\nfocus on understanding the cognitive underpinnings of the classification\ndecisions. We show that despite the architectural differences, both models\nconsistently produce a robust relationship between prediction accuracy and\nindividual cognitive performance, such that low performance leads to poor\nprediction accuracy. To achieve model explainability, we used permutation\ntechniques to calculate feature importance, allowing us to identify the most\ncritical brain regions influencing model predictions. Across models, we found\nthe dominance of visual networks, suggesting that task-driven state differences\nare primarily encoded in visual processing. Attention and control networks also\nshowed relatively high importance, however, default mode and temporal-parietal\nnetworks demonstrated negligible contribution in differentiating cognitive\nstates. Additionally, we observed individual trait-based effects and subtle\nmodel-specific differences, such that 1D-CNN showed slightly better overall\nperformance, while BiLSTM showed better sensitivity for individual behavior;\nthese initial findings require further research and robustness testing to be\nfully established. Our work underscores the importance of explainable DNN\nmodels in uncovering the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive state\ntransitions, providing a foundation for future work in this domain.","PeriodicalId":501517,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Networks and Performance Drive fMRI-Based State Classification Using DNN Models\",\"authors\":\"Murat Kucukosmanoglu, Javier O. Garcia, Justin Brooks, Kanika Bansal\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.00003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deep neural network (DNN) models have demonstrated impressive performance in\\nvarious domains, yet their application in cognitive neuroscience is limited due\\nto their lack of interpretability. In this study we employ two structurally\\ndifferent and complementary DNN-based models, a one-dimensional convolutional\\nneural network (1D-CNN) and a bidirectional long short-term memory network\\n(BiLSTM), to classify individual cognitive states from fMRI BOLD data, with a\\nfocus on understanding the cognitive underpinnings of the classification\\ndecisions. We show that despite the architectural differences, both models\\nconsistently produce a robust relationship between prediction accuracy and\\nindividual cognitive performance, such that low performance leads to poor\\nprediction accuracy. To achieve model explainability, we used permutation\\ntechniques to calculate feature importance, allowing us to identify the most\\ncritical brain regions influencing model predictions. Across models, we found\\nthe dominance of visual networks, suggesting that task-driven state differences\\nare primarily encoded in visual processing. Attention and control networks also\\nshowed relatively high importance, however, default mode and temporal-parietal\\nnetworks demonstrated negligible contribution in differentiating cognitive\\nstates. Additionally, we observed individual trait-based effects and subtle\\nmodel-specific differences, such that 1D-CNN showed slightly better overall\\nperformance, while BiLSTM showed better sensitivity for individual behavior;\\nthese initial findings require further research and robustness testing to be\\nfully established. Our work underscores the importance of explainable DNN\\nmodels in uncovering the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive state\\ntransitions, providing a foundation for future work in this domain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.00003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深度神经网络(DNN)模型在各个领域都表现出了令人印象深刻的性能,但由于缺乏可解释性,它们在认知神经科学中的应用受到了限制。在这项研究中,我们采用了两种结构不同但互补的基于 DNN 的模型--一维卷积神经网络(1D-CNN)和双向长短期记忆网络(BiLSTM)--对 fMRI BOLD 数据中的个体认知状态进行分类,重点是理解分类决策的认知基础。我们的研究表明,尽管在架构上存在差异,但这两种模型在预测准确率和个体认知表现之间始终保持着稳健的关系,即低表现导致低预测准确率。为了实现模型的可解释性,我们使用排列技术计算特征重要性,从而确定影响模型预测的最关键脑区。在所有模型中,我们发现视觉网络占主导地位,这表明任务驱动的状态差异主要在视觉处理中编码。注意和控制网络也表现出相对较高的重要性,但是默认模式和颞顶叶网络在认知状态差异中的贡献微乎其微。此外,我们还观察到了基于个体特质的效应和微妙的模型特异性差异,例如 1D-CNN 的总体表现略好,而 BiLSTM 对个体行为的敏感性更好;这些初步发现需要进一步的研究和稳健性测试才能完全确定。我们的工作强调了可解释 DNN 模型在揭示认知状态转换的神经机制方面的重要性,为这一领域未来的工作奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive Networks and Performance Drive fMRI-Based State Classification Using DNN Models
Deep neural network (DNN) models have demonstrated impressive performance in various domains, yet their application in cognitive neuroscience is limited due to their lack of interpretability. In this study we employ two structurally different and complementary DNN-based models, a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and a bidirectional long short-term memory network (BiLSTM), to classify individual cognitive states from fMRI BOLD data, with a focus on understanding the cognitive underpinnings of the classification decisions. We show that despite the architectural differences, both models consistently produce a robust relationship between prediction accuracy and individual cognitive performance, such that low performance leads to poor prediction accuracy. To achieve model explainability, we used permutation techniques to calculate feature importance, allowing us to identify the most critical brain regions influencing model predictions. Across models, we found the dominance of visual networks, suggesting that task-driven state differences are primarily encoded in visual processing. Attention and control networks also showed relatively high importance, however, default mode and temporal-parietal networks demonstrated negligible contribution in differentiating cognitive states. Additionally, we observed individual trait-based effects and subtle model-specific differences, such that 1D-CNN showed slightly better overall performance, while BiLSTM showed better sensitivity for individual behavior; these initial findings require further research and robustness testing to be fully established. Our work underscores the importance of explainable DNN models in uncovering the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive state transitions, providing a foundation for future work in this domain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信