Madhuchhanda Brahma, Maarten L. Van de Put, Edward Chen, Massimo V. Fischetti, William G. Vandenberghe
{"title":"静电掺杂对金属和二维材料边缘接触电阻的影响","authors":"Madhuchhanda Brahma, Maarten L. Van de Put, Edward Chen, Massimo V. Fischetti, William G. Vandenberghe","doi":"10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this theoretical study, we compare electrostatically doped metal-transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) edge-contacts versus substitutionally doped edge-contacts in terms of their contact resistance. Our approach involves the utilization of electrostatic doping achieved by applying back-gate bias to the metal-TMD edge contacts, where carrier injection is primarily governed by the Schottky barrier at the interface. To analyze these contacts, we employ the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximation to calculate the transmission coefficient and use density functional theory (DFT)-derived band structures. We numerically solve the Poisson equation to capture the electrostatic potential. We also account for the impact of the image force using Green's function for the Poisson equation with boundary conditions appropriate to our specific geometry. Our findings reveal that electrostatically doped TMD edge contacts exhibit higher contact resistance compared to impurity-doped edge contacts at equivalent carrier concentrations. At the same time, we find that, among the electrostatically doped edge contacts, a low-<math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mi>κ</mi></math> back-gate oxide in conjunction with low-<math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mi>κ</mi></math> top oxide is preferable in terms of improvement in contact resistance. For instance, in a metal-TMD edge contact scenario involving a monolayer <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><msub><mi>MoS</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></math> as the channel, <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><msub><mi>SiO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></math> as the infinitely thick top oxide, and a <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><msub><mi>SiO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></math> back-gate oxide with an equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) of <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mrow><mn>1</mn><mspace width=\"0.28em\"></mspace><mi>nm</mi></mrow></math>, we demonstrate that it is possible to achieve an impressively low contact resistance of <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mrow><mn>50</mn><mspace width=\"0.28em\"></mspace><mrow><mi mathvariant=\"normal\">Ω</mi><mspace width=\"0.28em\"></mspace><mi>µ</mi><mi mathvariant=\"normal\">m</mi></mrow></mrow></math> when the back-gate bias exceeds or equals 2 V.","PeriodicalId":20546,"journal":{"name":"Physical Review Research","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of electrostatic doping on the resistance of metal and two-dimensional materials edge contacts\",\"authors\":\"Madhuchhanda Brahma, Maarten L. Van de Put, Edward Chen, Massimo V. Fischetti, William G. Vandenberghe\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this theoretical study, we compare electrostatically doped metal-transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) edge-contacts versus substitutionally doped edge-contacts in terms of their contact resistance. Our approach involves the utilization of electrostatic doping achieved by applying back-gate bias to the metal-TMD edge contacts, where carrier injection is primarily governed by the Schottky barrier at the interface. To analyze these contacts, we employ the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximation to calculate the transmission coefficient and use density functional theory (DFT)-derived band structures. We numerically solve the Poisson equation to capture the electrostatic potential. We also account for the impact of the image force using Green's function for the Poisson equation with boundary conditions appropriate to our specific geometry. Our findings reveal that electrostatically doped TMD edge contacts exhibit higher contact resistance compared to impurity-doped edge contacts at equivalent carrier concentrations. At the same time, we find that, among the electrostatically doped edge contacts, a low-<math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mi>κ</mi></math> back-gate oxide in conjunction with low-<math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mi>κ</mi></math> top oxide is preferable in terms of improvement in contact resistance. For instance, in a metal-TMD edge contact scenario involving a monolayer <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><msub><mi>MoS</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></math> as the channel, <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><msub><mi>SiO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></math> as the infinitely thick top oxide, and a <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><msub><mi>SiO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></math> back-gate oxide with an equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) of <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mrow><mn>1</mn><mspace width=\\\"0.28em\\\"></mspace><mi>nm</mi></mrow></math>, we demonstrate that it is possible to achieve an impressively low contact resistance of <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mrow><mn>50</mn><mspace width=\\\"0.28em\\\"></mspace><mrow><mi mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">Ω</mi><mspace width=\\\"0.28em\\\"></mspace><mi>µ</mi><mi mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">m</mi></mrow></mrow></math> when the back-gate bias exceeds or equals 2 V.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Review Research\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Review Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Review Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Role of electrostatic doping on the resistance of metal and two-dimensional materials edge contacts
In this theoretical study, we compare electrostatically doped metal-transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) edge-contacts versus substitutionally doped edge-contacts in terms of their contact resistance. Our approach involves the utilization of electrostatic doping achieved by applying back-gate bias to the metal-TMD edge contacts, where carrier injection is primarily governed by the Schottky barrier at the interface. To analyze these contacts, we employ the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximation to calculate the transmission coefficient and use density functional theory (DFT)-derived band structures. We numerically solve the Poisson equation to capture the electrostatic potential. We also account for the impact of the image force using Green's function for the Poisson equation with boundary conditions appropriate to our specific geometry. Our findings reveal that electrostatically doped TMD edge contacts exhibit higher contact resistance compared to impurity-doped edge contacts at equivalent carrier concentrations. At the same time, we find that, among the electrostatically doped edge contacts, a low- back-gate oxide in conjunction with low- top oxide is preferable in terms of improvement in contact resistance. For instance, in a metal-TMD edge contact scenario involving a monolayer as the channel, as the infinitely thick top oxide, and a back-gate oxide with an equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) of , we demonstrate that it is possible to achieve an impressively low contact resistance of when the back-gate bias exceeds or equals 2 V.