通过虫害综合防治协调向日葵生态系统中的虫害防治和有益生物保护工作

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yousra Mukhtar, Uma Shankar
{"title":"通过虫害综合防治协调向日葵生态系统中的虫害防治和有益生物保护工作","authors":"Yousra Mukhtar, Uma Shankar","doi":"10.1007/s41348-024-00984-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sunflower, a highly cross-pollinated crop, relies significantly on both <i>Apis</i> and non-<i>Apis</i> bees for pollination. However, insect pests often necessitate pest management practices, which, while targeting pests, inadvertently disrupt pollinator foraging and visitation, resulting in reduced yields. Recognizing this, the impact of pest management modules on sunflower cultivation was studied, focusing on major insect pests, pollinators, and natural enemies. Over a two-year study, conducted at Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu (SKUAST-J), two major insect pests, <i>Helicoverpa armigera,</i> and <i>Spodoptera litura</i> (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera), alongside twenty-five pollinating bee species and five natural enemies were recorded within the sunflower ecosystem. Four pest management modules (M-I: deep plowing + hand picking + pheromone traps @ 4/acre + bird perches @ 10/acre + alternative spray of <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> @2 ml/lit and Spinosad 45 SC @0.2 ml/lit; M-II: deep plowing + hand picking + pheromone traps @ 4/acre + bird perches @ 10/acre + blanket spray of Neem oil @5 ml/lit and <i>Beauvaria bassiana</i> @ 2 ml/lit; M-III: deep plowing + hand picking + pheromone traps @ 4/acre + bird perches @ 10/acre + alternative spray of emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.4 g/lit + chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @0.3 ml/lit; M-IV: control) were evaluated for their efficacy against major insect pests, bee visitation, and natural enemy populations. Module-III emerged as the most effective, reducing larval counts of <i>H. armigera</i> and <i>S. litura</i> by 81.05% and 82.98% over the control, respectively, comparable to Module-I. However, bee visitation varied among modules, with Module-III consistently exhibiting the lowest mean values and substantial reductions compared to the control (56.73%). Dynamics of natural enemies revealed significantly higher predator populations and parasitization rates in modules using non-synthetic chemical insecticides, namely Module-IV (control), Module-I, and Module-II, compared to Module-III. Seed yield analysis highlighted Module-I as the most influential, showcasing a 215.95% increase over the control, underscoring its agronomic and economic superiority (cost–benefit ratio: 1:1.89). These findings emphasize the importance of integrating non-synthetic chemical insecticides into pest management strategies to effectively combat major insect pests, yielding higher returns while maintaining harmony among pollinator and natural enemy populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harmonizing pest control and beneficial organism conservation in sunflower ecosystems through integrated pest management\",\"authors\":\"Yousra Mukhtar, Uma Shankar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41348-024-00984-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Sunflower, a highly cross-pollinated crop, relies significantly on both <i>Apis</i> and non-<i>Apis</i> bees for pollination. However, insect pests often necessitate pest management practices, which, while targeting pests, inadvertently disrupt pollinator foraging and visitation, resulting in reduced yields. Recognizing this, the impact of pest management modules on sunflower cultivation was studied, focusing on major insect pests, pollinators, and natural enemies. Over a two-year study, conducted at Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu (SKUAST-J), two major insect pests, <i>Helicoverpa armigera,</i> and <i>Spodoptera litura</i> (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera), alongside twenty-five pollinating bee species and five natural enemies were recorded within the sunflower ecosystem. Four pest management modules (M-I: deep plowing + hand picking + pheromone traps @ 4/acre + bird perches @ 10/acre + alternative spray of <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> @2 ml/lit and Spinosad 45 SC @0.2 ml/lit; M-II: deep plowing + hand picking + pheromone traps @ 4/acre + bird perches @ 10/acre + blanket spray of Neem oil @5 ml/lit and <i>Beauvaria bassiana</i> @ 2 ml/lit; M-III: deep plowing + hand picking + pheromone traps @ 4/acre + bird perches @ 10/acre + alternative spray of emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.4 g/lit + chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @0.3 ml/lit; M-IV: control) were evaluated for their efficacy against major insect pests, bee visitation, and natural enemy populations. Module-III emerged as the most effective, reducing larval counts of <i>H. armigera</i> and <i>S. litura</i> by 81.05% and 82.98% over the control, respectively, comparable to Module-I. However, bee visitation varied among modules, with Module-III consistently exhibiting the lowest mean values and substantial reductions compared to the control (56.73%). Dynamics of natural enemies revealed significantly higher predator populations and parasitization rates in modules using non-synthetic chemical insecticides, namely Module-IV (control), Module-I, and Module-II, compared to Module-III. Seed yield analysis highlighted Module-I as the most influential, showcasing a 215.95% increase over the control, underscoring its agronomic and economic superiority (cost–benefit ratio: 1:1.89). These findings emphasize the importance of integrating non-synthetic chemical insecticides into pest management strategies to effectively combat major insect pests, yielding higher returns while maintaining harmony among pollinator and natural enemy populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-00984-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-00984-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

向日葵是一种高度异花授粉作物,在很大程度上依赖蜜蜂和非蜜蜂授粉。然而,虫害往往要求采取虫害管理措施,在针对虫害的同时,无意中扰乱了传粉昆虫的觅食和造访,从而导致减产。有鉴于此,我们研究了害虫管理模块对向日葵种植的影响,重点关注主要害虫、授粉昆虫和天敌。在查谟谢尔-克什米尔农业科技大学(SKUAST-J)进行的为期两年的研究中,记录了向日葵生态系统中的两种主要害虫 Helicoverpa armigera 和 Spodoptera litura(夜蛾科:鳞翅目),以及 25 种授粉蜂和 5 种天敌。四种害虫管理模式(M-I:深耕 + 人工采摘 + 信息素诱捕器 @ 4 个/英亩 + 鸟笼 @ 10 个/英亩 + 替代喷洒苏云金芽孢杆菌 @ 2 毫升/升和 Spinosad 45 SC @ 0.2 毫升/升;M-II:深耕 + 人工采摘 + 信息素诱捕器 @ 4 个/英亩 + 鸟栖息地 @ 10 个/英亩 + 印度楝油 @ 5 毫升/升和巴氏杀螨剂 @ 2 毫升/升的一揽子喷洒;M-III:深耕 + 人工采摘 + 信息素诱捕器 @ 4 个/英亩 + 鸟栖息地 @ 10 个/英亩 + 敌克松苯甲酸盐 5 SG @ 0.在对主要害虫、蜜蜂来访和天敌种群的防治效果进行评估后,发现模块-III 是防治害虫效果最好的方法。模块-III 是最有效的,与对照相比,H. armigera 和 S. litura 的幼虫数量分别减少了 81.05% 和 82.98%,与模块-I 相当。然而,不同模块的蜜蜂访问量各不相同,模块-III 的平均值一直最低,与对照相比大幅减少了 56.73%。天敌动态分析显示,与模块-III 相比,使用非合成化学杀虫剂的模块,即模块-IV(对照)、模块-I 和模块-II 的天敌数量和寄生率明显更高。种子产量分析显示,模块-I 的影响最大,比对照增产 215.95%,凸显了其农艺和经济优势(成本效益比:1:1.89)。这些研究结果强调了将非合成化学杀虫剂纳入害虫管理策略的重要性,以有效防治主要害虫,获得更高的收益,同时保持授粉昆虫和天敌种群之间的和谐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Harmonizing pest control and beneficial organism conservation in sunflower ecosystems through integrated pest management

Harmonizing pest control and beneficial organism conservation in sunflower ecosystems through integrated pest management

Sunflower, a highly cross-pollinated crop, relies significantly on both Apis and non-Apis bees for pollination. However, insect pests often necessitate pest management practices, which, while targeting pests, inadvertently disrupt pollinator foraging and visitation, resulting in reduced yields. Recognizing this, the impact of pest management modules on sunflower cultivation was studied, focusing on major insect pests, pollinators, and natural enemies. Over a two-year study, conducted at Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu (SKUAST-J), two major insect pests, Helicoverpa armigera, and Spodoptera litura (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera), alongside twenty-five pollinating bee species and five natural enemies were recorded within the sunflower ecosystem. Four pest management modules (M-I: deep plowing + hand picking + pheromone traps @ 4/acre + bird perches @ 10/acre + alternative spray of Bacillus thuringiensis @2 ml/lit and Spinosad 45 SC @0.2 ml/lit; M-II: deep plowing + hand picking + pheromone traps @ 4/acre + bird perches @ 10/acre + blanket spray of Neem oil @5 ml/lit and Beauvaria bassiana @ 2 ml/lit; M-III: deep plowing + hand picking + pheromone traps @ 4/acre + bird perches @ 10/acre + alternative spray of emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.4 g/lit + chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @0.3 ml/lit; M-IV: control) were evaluated for their efficacy against major insect pests, bee visitation, and natural enemy populations. Module-III emerged as the most effective, reducing larval counts of H. armigera and S. litura by 81.05% and 82.98% over the control, respectively, comparable to Module-I. However, bee visitation varied among modules, with Module-III consistently exhibiting the lowest mean values and substantial reductions compared to the control (56.73%). Dynamics of natural enemies revealed significantly higher predator populations and parasitization rates in modules using non-synthetic chemical insecticides, namely Module-IV (control), Module-I, and Module-II, compared to Module-III. Seed yield analysis highlighted Module-I as the most influential, showcasing a 215.95% increase over the control, underscoring its agronomic and economic superiority (cost–benefit ratio: 1:1.89). These findings emphasize the importance of integrating non-synthetic chemical insecticides into pest management strategies to effectively combat major insect pests, yielding higher returns while maintaining harmony among pollinator and natural enemy populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection (JPDP) is an international scientific journal that publishes original research articles, reviews, short communications, position and opinion papers dealing with applied scientific aspects of plant pathology, plant health, plant protection and findings on newly occurring diseases and pests. "Special Issues" on coherent themes often arising from International Conferences are offered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信