Qiliang Fang, Takashi J. Moriya, Lucía Ferrari, Keiichi Maeda, Gaston Folatelli, Keila Y. Ertini, Hanindyo Kuncarayakti, Jennifer E. Andrews, Tatsuya Matsumoto
{"title":"II 型超新星富氢包层质量的多样性(II):SN 2023ixf 作为部分剥离的中等质量恒星的爆炸","authors":"Qiliang Fang, Takashi J. Moriya, Lucía Ferrari, Keiichi Maeda, Gaston Folatelli, Keila Y. Ertini, Hanindyo Kuncarayakti, Jennifer E. Andrews, Tatsuya Matsumoto","doi":"arxiv-2409.03540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SN 2023ixf is one of the most well-observed core-collapse supernova in recent\ndecades, yet there is inconsistency in the inferred zero-age-main-sequence\n(ZAMS) mass $M_{\\rm ZAMS}$ of its progenitor. Direct observations of the pre-SN\nred supergiant (RSG) estimate $M_{\\rm ZAMS}$ spanning widely from 11 to 18\n$M_{\\rm \\odot}$. Additional constraints, including host environment and the\npulsation of its progenitor RSG, suggest a massive progenitor with $M_{\\rm\nZAMS}$ > 17 $M_{\\rm \\odot}$. However, the analysis of the properties of\nsupernova, from light curve modeling to late phase spectroscopy, favor a\nrelatively low mass scenario ($M_{\\rm ZAMS}$ < 15 $M_{\\rm \\odot}$). In this\nwork, we conduct systematic analysis of SN 2023ixf, from the RSG progenitor,\nplateau phase light curve to late phase spectroscopy. Using MESA+STELLA to\nsimulate the RSG progenitor and their explosions, we find that, despite the\nZAMS mass of the RSG models being varied from 12.0 to 17.5 $M_{\\rm \\odot}$,\nthey can produce light curves that well match with SN 2023ixf if the envelope\nmass and the explosion energy are allowed to vary. Using late phase\nspectroscopy as independent measurement, the oxygen emission line [O I]\nsuggests the ZAMS is intermediate massive (~16.0 $M_{\\rm \\odot}$), and the\nrelatively weak H$\\alpha$ emission line indicates the hydrogen envelope has\nbeen partially removed before the explosion. By incorporating the velocity\nstructure derived from the light curve modeling into an axisymmetric model, we\nsuccessfully generated [O I] line profiles that are consistent with the [O I]\nline observed in late phase spectroscopy of SN 2023ixf. Bringing these analyses\ntogether, we conclude that SN 2023ixf is the aspherical explosion of an\nintermediate massive star ($M_{\\rm ZAMS}$ = 15-16 $M_{\\rm \\odot}$) with the\nhydrogen envelope being partially stripped to 4-5 $M_{\\rm \\odot}$ prior to its\nexplosion.","PeriodicalId":501343,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity in hydrogen-rich envelope mass of type II supernovae (II): SN 2023ixf as explosion of partially-stripped intermediate massive star\",\"authors\":\"Qiliang Fang, Takashi J. Moriya, Lucía Ferrari, Keiichi Maeda, Gaston Folatelli, Keila Y. Ertini, Hanindyo Kuncarayakti, Jennifer E. Andrews, Tatsuya Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.03540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SN 2023ixf is one of the most well-observed core-collapse supernova in recent\\ndecades, yet there is inconsistency in the inferred zero-age-main-sequence\\n(ZAMS) mass $M_{\\\\rm ZAMS}$ of its progenitor. Direct observations of the pre-SN\\nred supergiant (RSG) estimate $M_{\\\\rm ZAMS}$ spanning widely from 11 to 18\\n$M_{\\\\rm \\\\odot}$. Additional constraints, including host environment and the\\npulsation of its progenitor RSG, suggest a massive progenitor with $M_{\\\\rm\\nZAMS}$ > 17 $M_{\\\\rm \\\\odot}$. However, the analysis of the properties of\\nsupernova, from light curve modeling to late phase spectroscopy, favor a\\nrelatively low mass scenario ($M_{\\\\rm ZAMS}$ < 15 $M_{\\\\rm \\\\odot}$). In this\\nwork, we conduct systematic analysis of SN 2023ixf, from the RSG progenitor,\\nplateau phase light curve to late phase spectroscopy. Using MESA+STELLA to\\nsimulate the RSG progenitor and their explosions, we find that, despite the\\nZAMS mass of the RSG models being varied from 12.0 to 17.5 $M_{\\\\rm \\\\odot}$,\\nthey can produce light curves that well match with SN 2023ixf if the envelope\\nmass and the explosion energy are allowed to vary. Using late phase\\nspectroscopy as independent measurement, the oxygen emission line [O I]\\nsuggests the ZAMS is intermediate massive (~16.0 $M_{\\\\rm \\\\odot}$), and the\\nrelatively weak H$\\\\alpha$ emission line indicates the hydrogen envelope has\\nbeen partially removed before the explosion. By incorporating the velocity\\nstructure derived from the light curve modeling into an axisymmetric model, we\\nsuccessfully generated [O I] line profiles that are consistent with the [O I]\\nline observed in late phase spectroscopy of SN 2023ixf. Bringing these analyses\\ntogether, we conclude that SN 2023ixf is the aspherical explosion of an\\nintermediate massive star ($M_{\\\\rm ZAMS}$ = 15-16 $M_{\\\\rm \\\\odot}$) with the\\nhydrogen envelope being partially stripped to 4-5 $M_{\\\\rm \\\\odot}$ prior to its\\nexplosion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.03540\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.03540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diversity in hydrogen-rich envelope mass of type II supernovae (II): SN 2023ixf as explosion of partially-stripped intermediate massive star
SN 2023ixf is one of the most well-observed core-collapse supernova in recent
decades, yet there is inconsistency in the inferred zero-age-main-sequence
(ZAMS) mass $M_{\rm ZAMS}$ of its progenitor. Direct observations of the pre-SN
red supergiant (RSG) estimate $M_{\rm ZAMS}$ spanning widely from 11 to 18
$M_{\rm \odot}$. Additional constraints, including host environment and the
pulsation of its progenitor RSG, suggest a massive progenitor with $M_{\rm
ZAMS}$ > 17 $M_{\rm \odot}$. However, the analysis of the properties of
supernova, from light curve modeling to late phase spectroscopy, favor a
relatively low mass scenario ($M_{\rm ZAMS}$ < 15 $M_{\rm \odot}$). In this
work, we conduct systematic analysis of SN 2023ixf, from the RSG progenitor,
plateau phase light curve to late phase spectroscopy. Using MESA+STELLA to
simulate the RSG progenitor and their explosions, we find that, despite the
ZAMS mass of the RSG models being varied from 12.0 to 17.5 $M_{\rm \odot}$,
they can produce light curves that well match with SN 2023ixf if the envelope
mass and the explosion energy are allowed to vary. Using late phase
spectroscopy as independent measurement, the oxygen emission line [O I]
suggests the ZAMS is intermediate massive (~16.0 $M_{\rm \odot}$), and the
relatively weak H$\alpha$ emission line indicates the hydrogen envelope has
been partially removed before the explosion. By incorporating the velocity
structure derived from the light curve modeling into an axisymmetric model, we
successfully generated [O I] line profiles that are consistent with the [O I]
line observed in late phase spectroscopy of SN 2023ixf. Bringing these analyses
together, we conclude that SN 2023ixf is the aspherical explosion of an
intermediate massive star ($M_{\rm ZAMS}$ = 15-16 $M_{\rm \odot}$) with the
hydrogen envelope being partially stripped to 4-5 $M_{\rm \odot}$ prior to its
explosion.