条件均值和方差动态模型的改进估计

IF 1.2 4区 数学 Q3 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Weining Wang, Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, Mengshan Xu
{"title":"条件均值和方差动态模型的改进估计","authors":"Weining Wang, Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, Mengshan Xu","doi":"10.1111/jtsa.12770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using ‘working’ assumptions on conditional third and fourth moments of errors, we propose a method of moments estimator that can have improved efficiency over the popular Gaussian quasi‐maximum likelihood estimator (GQMLE). Higher‐order moment assumptions are not needed for consistency – we only require the first two conditional moments to be correctly specified – but the optimal instruments are derived under these assumptions. The working assumptions allow both asymmetry in the distribution of the standardized errors as well as fourth moments that can be smaller or larger than that of the Gaussian distribution. The approach is related to the generalized estimation equations (GEE) approach – which seeks the improvement of estimators of the conditional mean parameters by making working assumptions on the conditional second moments. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the new estimator and show that it does not depend on the estimators of the third and fourth moments. A simulation study shows that the efficiency gains over the GQMLE can be non‐trivial.","PeriodicalId":49973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Time Series Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved estimation of dynamic models of conditional means and variances\",\"authors\":\"Weining Wang, Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, Mengshan Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jtsa.12770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using ‘working’ assumptions on conditional third and fourth moments of errors, we propose a method of moments estimator that can have improved efficiency over the popular Gaussian quasi‐maximum likelihood estimator (GQMLE). Higher‐order moment assumptions are not needed for consistency – we only require the first two conditional moments to be correctly specified – but the optimal instruments are derived under these assumptions. The working assumptions allow both asymmetry in the distribution of the standardized errors as well as fourth moments that can be smaller or larger than that of the Gaussian distribution. The approach is related to the generalized estimation equations (GEE) approach – which seeks the improvement of estimators of the conditional mean parameters by making working assumptions on the conditional second moments. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the new estimator and show that it does not depend on the estimators of the third and fourth moments. A simulation study shows that the efficiency gains over the GQMLE can be non‐trivial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Time Series Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Time Series Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12770\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Time Series Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用对误差的条件第三和第四矩的 "工作 "假设,我们提出了一种矩估计方法,与流行的高斯准极大似然估计方法(GQMLE)相比,该方法的效率更高。为了保持一致性,我们不需要高阶矩假设--我们只需要正确指定前两个条件矩--但最优工具是在这些假设下推导出来的。工作假设允许标准化误差分布的不对称性,以及第四矩可能小于或大于高斯分布。该方法与广义估计方程(GEE)方法相关--后者通过对条件第二矩做出工作假设来改进条件均值参数的估计值。我们推导出了新估计器的渐近分布,并证明它不依赖于第三和第四时刻的估计器。一项模拟研究表明,与 GQMLE 相比,效率的提高可能不是微不足道的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved estimation of dynamic models of conditional means and variances
Using ‘working’ assumptions on conditional third and fourth moments of errors, we propose a method of moments estimator that can have improved efficiency over the popular Gaussian quasi‐maximum likelihood estimator (GQMLE). Higher‐order moment assumptions are not needed for consistency – we only require the first two conditional moments to be correctly specified – but the optimal instruments are derived under these assumptions. The working assumptions allow both asymmetry in the distribution of the standardized errors as well as fourth moments that can be smaller or larger than that of the Gaussian distribution. The approach is related to the generalized estimation equations (GEE) approach – which seeks the improvement of estimators of the conditional mean parameters by making working assumptions on the conditional second moments. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the new estimator and show that it does not depend on the estimators of the third and fourth moments. A simulation study shows that the efficiency gains over the GQMLE can be non‐trivial.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Time Series Analysis
Journal of Time Series Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: During the last 30 years Time Series Analysis has become one of the most important and widely used branches of Mathematical Statistics. Its fields of application range from neurophysiology to astrophysics and it covers such well-known areas as economic forecasting, study of biological data, control systems, signal processing and communications and vibrations engineering. The Journal of Time Series Analysis started in 1980, has since become the leading journal in its field, publishing papers on both fundamental theory and applications, as well as review papers dealing with recent advances in major areas of the subject and short communications on theoretical developments. The editorial board consists of many of the world''s leading experts in Time Series Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信