776. THREE-FIELD LYMPHADENECTOMY IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: EXPERIENCE OF A PORTUGUESE TERTIARY CENTER

Background The American Joint Committee for Cancer (AJCC) and the Japanese Esophagus Society (JES) differ in the N classification for esophageal cancer, with the former considering the presence of disease in the supraclavicular lymph nodes as M1, and the latter classifying it as loco-regional disease in thoracic esophageal tumors. Patients who would be excluded from a curative intent treatment strategy by the AJCC classification may be candidates for surgery with lymphadenectomy of nodal groups 101 and 104 (JES). Our goal is to understand the impact of three-field lymphadenectomy on morbidity, loco-regional control and overall survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from a prospective database from a single center, which included all consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer with either two-field total thoracic lymphadenectomy or three-field lymphadenectomy, between January 2019 and December 2023. Three-field lymphadenectomy was performed for clinical supraclavicular and recurrent nerve nodal involvement and for proximal third tumors. We assessed the morbidity and mortality of both types of surgery, and loco-regional and distant recurrence and overall survival for both groups. Results Of the 279 esophagectomies for cancer, 137 were included for analysis. The median age was 65 years, with 84% males. 58,4% had squamous cell carcinoma and 41,6% adenocarcinoma. 34.3% of the patients had a 3-field lymphadenectomy, 27,7% of these for supraclavicular N+ and 34% for recurrent nerve N+. Conclusion In this large single-center cohort, patients with significant lymph node involvement, treated with esophagectomy and three-field lymphadenectomy, demonstrated comparable loco-regional control and overall survival to more favorable cases, with no statistically significant increase in morbidity and mortality.