433.揭示食管腺癌肿瘤分化背后的分子机制

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Gavin Wilson, Karanbir Brar, Frances Allison, Jonathan Allen, Yvonne Bach, James Cotton, Elliot Wakeam, Gail Darling, Elena Elimova, Sangeetha N Kalimuthu, Jonathan Yeung
{"title":"433.揭示食管腺癌肿瘤分化背后的分子机制","authors":"Gavin Wilson, Karanbir Brar, Frances Allison, Jonathan Allen, Yvonne Bach, James Cotton, Elliot Wakeam, Gail Darling, Elena Elimova, Sangeetha N Kalimuthu, Jonathan Yeung","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae057.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Esophageal adenocarcinoma tumors are divided into three grades based on the tumour’s histological differentiation: well, moderate and poor. Poorly differentiated tumours have a worse survival rate than moderate and well tumours. Understanding the molecular programs of this differentiation may lead to the identification of novel therapeutic interventions specific to tumour differentiation. We have utilized laser-capture microdissection to enrich tumour cells followed by gene expression profiling (RNA-seq) to identify gene expression programs and whole genome sequencing for differentiating specific mutations and copy number changes. Collectively, these results will enable us to unravel the molecular drivers of tumour differentiation. Methods Laser capture microdissection was applied to N=127 RNA-seq samples from N=74 patients and N=103 from N=81 patients from a mix of primary tumour biopsies, resections, and metastatic biopsies. Most samples have a matching RNA-seq and WGS sample. We used a standard pipeline to analyze the WGS data and produce somatic mutation, structural variant, and copy number calls. The gene expression data was segregated into two sets a test set consisting of N=74 samples and a test set of N=53 samples. Non-negative matrix factorization was used to identify eleven gene expression programs. Results Our testing RNA-seq cohort consisted of N=74 samples from N=74 patients with N=4 G1, N=26 G2, N=35 G3, and N=9 missing differentiation data. Our initial goal was to unravel the gene expression programs that correlate with tumour differentiation. Our non-negative matrix factorization analysis yielded 11 gene signatures, N=3 programs enriched in glandular gene expression, N=3 enriched in EMT pathways, N=2 with fibroblasts, and N=3 associated with immune / inflammation genes (not shown) (Figure 1). Moreover, the glandular signatures were associated with G1/G2 and the EMT and fibroblast signatures with G3. Moreover, the glandular 2 signature was associated with HER2 amplifications. Conclusion In this work we have begun to unravel the gene expression and genomic changes associated with tumour differentiation. We have found signatures enriched for both G1/G2 and G3 tumours and from these signatures we have observed gene expression heterogeneity within the different tumour differentiation categories. Moreover, the G3 tumours are enriched in fibroblasts despite our laser-capture microdissection. We are currently working on a classification model to predict tumor differentiation from these gene expression programs and are looking to further integrate our whole genome data to find additional genomic drivers.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"433. UNRAVELLING THE MOLECULAR MECHANISMS BEHIND TUMOUR DIFFERENTIATION IN ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA\",\"authors\":\"Gavin Wilson, Karanbir Brar, Frances Allison, Jonathan Allen, Yvonne Bach, James Cotton, Elliot Wakeam, Gail Darling, Elena Elimova, Sangeetha N Kalimuthu, Jonathan Yeung\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dote/doae057.184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Esophageal adenocarcinoma tumors are divided into three grades based on the tumour’s histological differentiation: well, moderate and poor. Poorly differentiated tumours have a worse survival rate than moderate and well tumours. Understanding the molecular programs of this differentiation may lead to the identification of novel therapeutic interventions specific to tumour differentiation. We have utilized laser-capture microdissection to enrich tumour cells followed by gene expression profiling (RNA-seq) to identify gene expression programs and whole genome sequencing for differentiating specific mutations and copy number changes. Collectively, these results will enable us to unravel the molecular drivers of tumour differentiation. Methods Laser capture microdissection was applied to N=127 RNA-seq samples from N=74 patients and N=103 from N=81 patients from a mix of primary tumour biopsies, resections, and metastatic biopsies. Most samples have a matching RNA-seq and WGS sample. We used a standard pipeline to analyze the WGS data and produce somatic mutation, structural variant, and copy number calls. The gene expression data was segregated into two sets a test set consisting of N=74 samples and a test set of N=53 samples. Non-negative matrix factorization was used to identify eleven gene expression programs. Results Our testing RNA-seq cohort consisted of N=74 samples from N=74 patients with N=4 G1, N=26 G2, N=35 G3, and N=9 missing differentiation data. Our initial goal was to unravel the gene expression programs that correlate with tumour differentiation. Our non-negative matrix factorization analysis yielded 11 gene signatures, N=3 programs enriched in glandular gene expression, N=3 enriched in EMT pathways, N=2 with fibroblasts, and N=3 associated with immune / inflammation genes (not shown) (Figure 1). Moreover, the glandular signatures were associated with G1/G2 and the EMT and fibroblast signatures with G3. Moreover, the glandular 2 signature was associated with HER2 amplifications. Conclusion In this work we have begun to unravel the gene expression and genomic changes associated with tumour differentiation. We have found signatures enriched for both G1/G2 and G3 tumours and from these signatures we have observed gene expression heterogeneity within the different tumour differentiation categories. Moreover, the G3 tumours are enriched in fibroblasts despite our laser-capture microdissection. We are currently working on a classification model to predict tumor differentiation from these gene expression programs and are looking to further integrate our whole genome data to find additional genomic drivers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 根据肿瘤的组织学分化程度,食管腺癌分为三个等级:良好、中等和较差。与中度和良好肿瘤相比,分化不良肿瘤的生存率更低。了解这种分化的分子程序可能有助于确定针对肿瘤分化的新型治疗干预措施。我们利用激光捕获显微切割来富集肿瘤细胞,然后通过基因表达谱分析(RNA-seq)来确定基因表达程序,并通过全基因组测序来区分特定突变和拷贝数变化。总之,这些结果将使我们能够揭示肿瘤分化的分子驱动因素。方法 将激光捕获微切片技术应用于来自 74 名患者的 N=127 个 RNA-seq 样本和来自 81 名患者的 N=103 个 RNA-seq 样本,这些样本来自原发性肿瘤活检、切除术和转移性活检。大多数样本都有匹配的 RNA-seq 和 WGS 样本。我们使用标准流水线分析 WGS 数据,并进行体细胞突变、结构变异和拷贝数调用。基因表达数据被分成两组,一组是由 N=74 个样本组成的测试集,另一组是由 N=53 个样本组成的测试集。使用非负矩阵因式分解来识别 11 个基因表达程序。结果 我们的测试 RNA-seq 队列由 N=74 个样本组成,这些样本来自 N=74 名患者,其中 N=4 个 G1、N=26 个 G2、N=35 个 G3,N=9 个分化数据缺失。我们的最初目标是揭示与肿瘤分化相关的基因表达程序。我们的非负矩阵因式分解分析得出了 11 个基因特征,N=3 个程序富含腺体基因表达,N=3 个富含 EMT 通路,N=2 个与成纤维细胞相关,N=3 个与免疫/炎症基因相关(未显示)(图 1)。此外,腺体特征与 G1/G2 相关,EMT 和成纤维细胞特征与 G3 相关。此外,腺体 2 特征与 HER2 扩增相关。结论 在这项工作中,我们开始揭示与肿瘤分化相关的基因表达和基因组变化。我们发现了 G1/G2 和 G3 肿瘤的富集特征,并从这些特征中观察到了不同肿瘤分化类别中基因表达的异质性。此外,尽管我们进行了激光捕获显微切割,但 G3 肿瘤仍富含成纤维细胞。我们目前正在建立一个分类模型,以便从这些基因表达程序中预测肿瘤分化,并希望进一步整合我们的全基因组数据,找到更多的基因组驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
433. UNRAVELLING THE MOLECULAR MECHANISMS BEHIND TUMOUR DIFFERENTIATION IN ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA
Background Esophageal adenocarcinoma tumors are divided into three grades based on the tumour’s histological differentiation: well, moderate and poor. Poorly differentiated tumours have a worse survival rate than moderate and well tumours. Understanding the molecular programs of this differentiation may lead to the identification of novel therapeutic interventions specific to tumour differentiation. We have utilized laser-capture microdissection to enrich tumour cells followed by gene expression profiling (RNA-seq) to identify gene expression programs and whole genome sequencing for differentiating specific mutations and copy number changes. Collectively, these results will enable us to unravel the molecular drivers of tumour differentiation. Methods Laser capture microdissection was applied to N=127 RNA-seq samples from N=74 patients and N=103 from N=81 patients from a mix of primary tumour biopsies, resections, and metastatic biopsies. Most samples have a matching RNA-seq and WGS sample. We used a standard pipeline to analyze the WGS data and produce somatic mutation, structural variant, and copy number calls. The gene expression data was segregated into two sets a test set consisting of N=74 samples and a test set of N=53 samples. Non-negative matrix factorization was used to identify eleven gene expression programs. Results Our testing RNA-seq cohort consisted of N=74 samples from N=74 patients with N=4 G1, N=26 G2, N=35 G3, and N=9 missing differentiation data. Our initial goal was to unravel the gene expression programs that correlate with tumour differentiation. Our non-negative matrix factorization analysis yielded 11 gene signatures, N=3 programs enriched in glandular gene expression, N=3 enriched in EMT pathways, N=2 with fibroblasts, and N=3 associated with immune / inflammation genes (not shown) (Figure 1). Moreover, the glandular signatures were associated with G1/G2 and the EMT and fibroblast signatures with G3. Moreover, the glandular 2 signature was associated with HER2 amplifications. Conclusion In this work we have begun to unravel the gene expression and genomic changes associated with tumour differentiation. We have found signatures enriched for both G1/G2 and G3 tumours and from these signatures we have observed gene expression heterogeneity within the different tumour differentiation categories. Moreover, the G3 tumours are enriched in fibroblasts despite our laser-capture microdissection. We are currently working on a classification model to predict tumor differentiation from these gene expression programs and are looking to further integrate our whole genome data to find additional genomic drivers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信