624.食管鳞状细胞癌的新辅助化疗后食管切除术与确定性质子束疗法的长期疗效比较

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Michitaka Honda, Satoshi Toshiyama, Yoshiaki Takagawa, Masao Murakami, Ryuya Yamamoto, Yasushi Teranishi
{"title":"624.食管鳞状细胞癌的新辅助化疗后食管切除术与确定性质子束疗法的长期疗效比较","authors":"Michitaka Honda, Satoshi Toshiyama, Yoshiaki Takagawa, Masao Murakami, Ryuya Yamamoto, Yasushi Teranishi","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae057.331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Proton beam therapy (PBT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a promising curable treatment to avoid surgery, however the long-term outcomes have not enough been reported. Herein, we compared the survival outcomes of PBT with those of esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which is the standard of care in Japan. Methods Patients with thoracic ESCC, clinical stage II or III, who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical resection and proton beam therapy between 2011 and 2020 were identified from database of our institute. The chemotherapy regimen was 5FU, CDDP (CF) with/without docetaxel. PBT was defined as irradiation of 50 GyE or more to the primary tumor, prophylactic irradiation, and concurrent chemotherapy (CF). Patients with other severe diseases and patients who could not be followed up were excluded. To adjust confounding factors, propensity score matching was performed; covariates included T and N-factor, age, gender, time of treatment and site of tumor. We retrospectively evaluated overall survival time of the surgery and PBT groups as primary outcome in this study. Results 244 patients were selected from the database. Median age was 71 years, 209 were male, 102 had esophagectomy after chemotherapy, and 142 had PBT. After propensity score matching, 46 patients in each group were selected by propensity score matching. Median survival was 42.8:44.6 months in the surgery and PBT groups, respectively (p=0.784). There were no treatment-related deaths, and Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 8 and 8 patients (p=1.00), respectively. Conclusion PBT for stages II and III ESCC was comparable to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in long-term outcomes and adverse events.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"624. LONG-TERM OUTCOME OF NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS DEFINITIVE PROTON BEAM THERAPY FOR ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA\",\"authors\":\"Michitaka Honda, Satoshi Toshiyama, Yoshiaki Takagawa, Masao Murakami, Ryuya Yamamoto, Yasushi Teranishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dote/doae057.331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Proton beam therapy (PBT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a promising curable treatment to avoid surgery, however the long-term outcomes have not enough been reported. Herein, we compared the survival outcomes of PBT with those of esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which is the standard of care in Japan. Methods Patients with thoracic ESCC, clinical stage II or III, who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical resection and proton beam therapy between 2011 and 2020 were identified from database of our institute. The chemotherapy regimen was 5FU, CDDP (CF) with/without docetaxel. PBT was defined as irradiation of 50 GyE or more to the primary tumor, prophylactic irradiation, and concurrent chemotherapy (CF). Patients with other severe diseases and patients who could not be followed up were excluded. To adjust confounding factors, propensity score matching was performed; covariates included T and N-factor, age, gender, time of treatment and site of tumor. We retrospectively evaluated overall survival time of the surgery and PBT groups as primary outcome in this study. Results 244 patients were selected from the database. Median age was 71 years, 209 were male, 102 had esophagectomy after chemotherapy, and 142 had PBT. After propensity score matching, 46 patients in each group were selected by propensity score matching. Median survival was 42.8:44.6 months in the surgery and PBT groups, respectively (p=0.784). There were no treatment-related deaths, and Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 8 and 8 patients (p=1.00), respectively. Conclusion PBT for stages II and III ESCC was comparable to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in long-term outcomes and adverse events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 质子射线疗法(PBT)治疗食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)是一种很有希望避免手术的可治愈疗法,但其长期疗效尚未得到充分报道。在此,我们比较了 PBT 与新辅助化疗后食管切除术的生存效果,新辅助化疗是日本的标准治疗方法。方法 从本研究所的数据库中找出 2011 年至 2020 年期间接受新辅助化疗加根治性切除术和质子束治疗的临床 II 期或 III 期胸部 ESCC 患者。化疗方案为5FU、CDDP(CF)联合/不联合多西他赛。质子束治疗的定义是对原发肿瘤进行 50 GyE 或以上的照射、预防性照射和同期化疗(CF)。患有其他严重疾病的患者和无法进行随访的患者被排除在外。为了调整混杂因素,我们进行了倾向评分匹配;协变量包括T因子和N因子、年龄、性别、治疗时间和肿瘤部位。我们对手术组和 PBT 组的总生存时间进行了回顾性评估,并将其作为本研究的主要结果。结果 从数据库中筛选出 244 名患者。中位年龄为 71 岁,209 人为男性,102 人在化疗后进行了食管切除术,142 人进行了 PBT。经过倾向得分匹配后,每组选出 46 名患者。手术组和 PBT 组的中位生存期分别为 42.8 个月:44.6 个月(P=0.784)。无治疗相关死亡病例,分别有 8 名和 8 名患者出现 3 级或以上不良反应(P=1.00)。结论 在长期疗效和不良反应方面,PBT 治疗 II 期和 III 期 ESCC 与新辅助化疗后手术治疗效果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
624. LONG-TERM OUTCOME OF NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS DEFINITIVE PROTON BEAM THERAPY FOR ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
Background Proton beam therapy (PBT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a promising curable treatment to avoid surgery, however the long-term outcomes have not enough been reported. Herein, we compared the survival outcomes of PBT with those of esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which is the standard of care in Japan. Methods Patients with thoracic ESCC, clinical stage II or III, who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical resection and proton beam therapy between 2011 and 2020 were identified from database of our institute. The chemotherapy regimen was 5FU, CDDP (CF) with/without docetaxel. PBT was defined as irradiation of 50 GyE or more to the primary tumor, prophylactic irradiation, and concurrent chemotherapy (CF). Patients with other severe diseases and patients who could not be followed up were excluded. To adjust confounding factors, propensity score matching was performed; covariates included T and N-factor, age, gender, time of treatment and site of tumor. We retrospectively evaluated overall survival time of the surgery and PBT groups as primary outcome in this study. Results 244 patients were selected from the database. Median age was 71 years, 209 were male, 102 had esophagectomy after chemotherapy, and 142 had PBT. After propensity score matching, 46 patients in each group were selected by propensity score matching. Median survival was 42.8:44.6 months in the surgery and PBT groups, respectively (p=0.784). There were no treatment-related deaths, and Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 8 and 8 patients (p=1.00), respectively. Conclusion PBT for stages II and III ESCC was comparable to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in long-term outcomes and adverse events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信