在毕业生支持社区中提高写作效率

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ali Yaylali, Sarah Albrecht, Kelly Jay Smith, Kate Shea
{"title":"在毕业生支持社区中提高写作效率","authors":"Ali Yaylali, Sarah Albrecht, Kelly Jay Smith, Kate Shea","doi":"10.1108/sgpe-12-2023-0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to examine how doctoral students in education and applied linguistics fields successfully navigated graduate writing demands by participating in a support community that catalyzed writing productivity, peer mentoring and feedback. Guiding graduate students’ writing processes based on scholarly interests and providing peer support are vital to scholarly productivity and transition into academia.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Following a collaborative analytic autoethnographic case study design (Adams <em>et al.</em>, 2022; Chang <em>et al.</em>, 2013), the authors narrated major events that impacted their writing and publication experiences. The authors visualized their entire doctoral writing experience based on the frequency of writing events that contributed to writing productivity. In data triangulation discussions, the authors reflected on writing experiences.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Findings show that the support community alleviated individual struggles associated with writing a dissertation and high-quality papers. Key factors contributing to scholarly growth included nonevaluative peer support, feedback and shared academic resources. Writing within the periphery of faculty research and predominantly focusing on doctoral milestones led to individual scholarly interests being overshadowed. Without structured guidance, doctoral writers may develop initiatives to alleviate individual struggles and meet academic writing demands in the disciplines.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The authors recommend including structured guidance on developing writing productivity and a personal research agenda in the early stages of the doctorate.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study offers unique examples of how a student group supported writing productivity and socialization into the academic community. It illustrates the multifaceted nature of academic writing influenced by faculty–student relationships, peers and individual initiatives. This paper provides doctoral writers and graduate programs with examples of accomplishing academic publishing goals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":42038,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing writing productivity in a graduate support community\",\"authors\":\"Ali Yaylali, Sarah Albrecht, Kelly Jay Smith, Kate Shea\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sgpe-12-2023-0118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This paper aims to examine how doctoral students in education and applied linguistics fields successfully navigated graduate writing demands by participating in a support community that catalyzed writing productivity, peer mentoring and feedback. Guiding graduate students’ writing processes based on scholarly interests and providing peer support are vital to scholarly productivity and transition into academia.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Following a collaborative analytic autoethnographic case study design (Adams <em>et al.</em>, 2022; Chang <em>et al.</em>, 2013), the authors narrated major events that impacted their writing and publication experiences. The authors visualized their entire doctoral writing experience based on the frequency of writing events that contributed to writing productivity. In data triangulation discussions, the authors reflected on writing experiences.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Findings show that the support community alleviated individual struggles associated with writing a dissertation and high-quality papers. Key factors contributing to scholarly growth included nonevaluative peer support, feedback and shared academic resources. Writing within the periphery of faculty research and predominantly focusing on doctoral milestones led to individual scholarly interests being overshadowed. Without structured guidance, doctoral writers may develop initiatives to alleviate individual struggles and meet academic writing demands in the disciplines.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The authors recommend including structured guidance on developing writing productivity and a personal research agenda in the early stages of the doctorate.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study offers unique examples of how a student group supported writing productivity and socialization into the academic community. It illustrates the multifaceted nature of academic writing influenced by faculty–student relationships, peers and individual initiatives. This paper provides doctoral writers and graduate programs with examples of accomplishing academic publishing goals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":42038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-12-2023-0118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-12-2023-0118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本文旨在研究教育学和应用语言学领域的博士生如何通过参与一个促进写作效率、同行指导和反馈的支持社区,成功地驾驭研究生写作要求。根据学术兴趣指导研究生的写作过程并提供同行支持,对于提高学术生产力和向学术界过渡至关重要。设计/方法/途径按照合作分析自述式案例研究设计(Adams 等人,2022 年;Chang 等人,2013 年),作者讲述了影响其写作和发表经历的主要事件。根据有助于提高写作效率的写作事件发生的频率,作者将他们的整个博士写作经历可视化。在数据三角分析讨论中,作者们对写作经历进行了反思。研究结果研究结果表明,支持社区减轻了与撰写论文和高质量论文相关的个人挣扎。促进学术成长的关键因素包括非评价性的同行支持、反馈和共享学术资源。在教师研究的外围写作,以及主要关注博士阶段性成果,导致个人学术兴趣被掩盖。如果没有结构化的指导,博士生写作者可能会制定一些举措来缓解个人的挣扎,并满足学科中的学术写作要求。研究局限性/影响作者建议在博士学位的早期阶段,在提高写作效率和制定个人研究议程方面提供结构化的指导。它说明了学术写作受师生关系、同行和个人倡议影响的多面性。本文为博士生写作者和研究生项目提供了实现学术出版目标的范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing writing productivity in a graduate support community

Purpose

This paper aims to examine how doctoral students in education and applied linguistics fields successfully navigated graduate writing demands by participating in a support community that catalyzed writing productivity, peer mentoring and feedback. Guiding graduate students’ writing processes based on scholarly interests and providing peer support are vital to scholarly productivity and transition into academia.

Design/methodology/approach

Following a collaborative analytic autoethnographic case study design (Adams et al., 2022; Chang et al., 2013), the authors narrated major events that impacted their writing and publication experiences. The authors visualized their entire doctoral writing experience based on the frequency of writing events that contributed to writing productivity. In data triangulation discussions, the authors reflected on writing experiences.

Findings

Findings show that the support community alleviated individual struggles associated with writing a dissertation and high-quality papers. Key factors contributing to scholarly growth included nonevaluative peer support, feedback and shared academic resources. Writing within the periphery of faculty research and predominantly focusing on doctoral milestones led to individual scholarly interests being overshadowed. Without structured guidance, doctoral writers may develop initiatives to alleviate individual struggles and meet academic writing demands in the disciplines.

Research limitations/implications

The authors recommend including structured guidance on developing writing productivity and a personal research agenda in the early stages of the doctorate.

Originality/value

This study offers unique examples of how a student group supported writing productivity and socialization into the academic community. It illustrates the multifaceted nature of academic writing influenced by faculty–student relationships, peers and individual initiatives. This paper provides doctoral writers and graduate programs with examples of accomplishing academic publishing goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信