智能服务的采用:隐私问题、对仁慈的信任和使用体验重要吗?

IF 2.7 Q2 BUSINESS
Catherine Viot, Charlotte Lecuyer, Caroline Bayart, Agnès Lancini
{"title":"智能服务的采用:隐私问题、对仁慈的信任和使用体验重要吗?","authors":"Catherine Viot, Charlotte Lecuyer, Caroline Bayart, Agnès Lancini","doi":"10.1108/jcm-04-2022-5299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this research is to investigate the influence of service provider benevolence trust and privacy concerns on the intention to adopt smart services (SS), in line with the privacy paradox. It also seeks to analyze the role of smart connected product (SCP) usage, between current and potential users.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study specifically focuses on one type of SS: smart-connected car insurance based on the “pay as you drive” and/or “pay how you drive” principle. Data were collected through an online survey of 362 French drivers. Hypotheses are tested using structural equation modeling and a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results show that trust in the benevolence of the service providers positively influences the intention to adopt SS, regardless of how familiar consumers are with SCP. Conversely, privacy concerns have a negative impact on such intention, but this effect only occurs among consumers who already own SCP.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>From a managerial perspective, this research could help service providers to successfully develop and promote SS, by establishing a relationship based on benevolence and transparency regarding the use of personal information. In addition, managers should promote SS differently when addressing SCP users, seeking to reassure them or avoid addressing privacy concerns.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Our study adds to the privacy paradox theoretical framework by empirically analyzing drivers of SS adoption. It highlights the key but distinct roles of privacy concerns and benevolence trust.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":35923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The adoption of smart services: do privacy concerns, trust in benevolence and usage experience matter?\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Viot, Charlotte Lecuyer, Caroline Bayart, Agnès Lancini\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jcm-04-2022-5299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The purpose of this research is to investigate the influence of service provider benevolence trust and privacy concerns on the intention to adopt smart services (SS), in line with the privacy paradox. It also seeks to analyze the role of smart connected product (SCP) usage, between current and potential users.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The study specifically focuses on one type of SS: smart-connected car insurance based on the “pay as you drive” and/or “pay how you drive” principle. Data were collected through an online survey of 362 French drivers. Hypotheses are tested using structural equation modeling and a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The results show that trust in the benevolence of the service providers positively influences the intention to adopt SS, regardless of how familiar consumers are with SCP. Conversely, privacy concerns have a negative impact on such intention, but this effect only occurs among consumers who already own SCP.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>From a managerial perspective, this research could help service providers to successfully develop and promote SS, by establishing a relationship based on benevolence and transparency regarding the use of personal information. In addition, managers should promote SS differently when addressing SCP users, seeking to reassure them or avoid addressing privacy concerns.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Our study adds to the privacy paradox theoretical framework by empirically analyzing drivers of SS adoption. It highlights the key but distinct roles of privacy concerns and benevolence trust.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":35923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Marketing\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-04-2022-5299\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-04-2022-5299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究的目的是根据隐私悖论,调查服务提供商的仁慈信任和隐私担忧对采用智能服务(SS)的意愿的影响。本研究特别关注一种智能服务:基于 "边开边付 "和/或 "怎么开就怎么付 "原则的智能互联汽车保险。通过对 362 名法国驾驶员进行在线调查收集数据。研究结果表明,无论消费者对智能互联汽车保险的熟悉程度如何,对服务提供商仁慈的信任都会对采用智能互联汽车保险的意愿产生积极影响。从管理的角度来看,这项研究可以帮助服务提供商在个人信息使用方面建立一种基于仁慈和透明的关系,从而成功地开发和推广社交网络服务。此外,管理者在面对 SCP 用户时,应该以不同的方式推广 SS,寻求让他们放心或避免解决隐私问题。原创性/价值我们的研究通过实证分析采用 SS 的驱动因素,为隐私悖论理论框架添砖加瓦。它强调了隐私顾虑和仁慈信任的关键但截然不同的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The adoption of smart services: do privacy concerns, trust in benevolence and usage experience matter?

Purpose

The purpose of this research is to investigate the influence of service provider benevolence trust and privacy concerns on the intention to adopt smart services (SS), in line with the privacy paradox. It also seeks to analyze the role of smart connected product (SCP) usage, between current and potential users.

Design/methodology/approach

The study specifically focuses on one type of SS: smart-connected car insurance based on the “pay as you drive” and/or “pay how you drive” principle. Data were collected through an online survey of 362 French drivers. Hypotheses are tested using structural equation modeling and a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis.

Findings

The results show that trust in the benevolence of the service providers positively influences the intention to adopt SS, regardless of how familiar consumers are with SCP. Conversely, privacy concerns have a negative impact on such intention, but this effect only occurs among consumers who already own SCP.

Practical implications

From a managerial perspective, this research could help service providers to successfully develop and promote SS, by establishing a relationship based on benevolence and transparency regarding the use of personal information. In addition, managers should promote SS differently when addressing SCP users, seeking to reassure them or avoid addressing privacy concerns.

Originality/value

Our study adds to the privacy paradox theoretical framework by empirically analyzing drivers of SS adoption. It highlights the key but distinct roles of privacy concerns and benevolence trust.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Consumer Marketing
Journal of Consumer Marketing Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: ■Consumer behaviour ■Customer policy and service ■Practical case studies to illustrate concepts ■The latest thinking and research in marketing planning ■The marketing of services worldwide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信