评估 YiDiXie™-SS 和 YiDiXie™-HS 对胃癌的诊断价值

Huimei Zhou, Chen Sun, Yanrong Qi, Yutong Wu, Xutai Li, Zhenjian Ge, Wenkang Chen, Yingqi Li, Pengwu Zhang, Shengjie Lin, Wuping Wang, Siwei Chen, Wei Li, Xi Li, Ling Ji, Yongqing Lai
{"title":"评估 YiDiXie™-SS 和 YiDiXie™-HS 对胃癌的诊断价值","authors":"Huimei Zhou, Chen Sun, Yanrong Qi, Yutong Wu, Xutai Li, Zhenjian Ge, Wenkang Chen, Yingqi Li, Pengwu Zhang, Shengjie Lin, Wuping Wang, Siwei Chen, Wei Li, Xi Li, Ling Ji, Yongqing Lai","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.21.24312336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gastric cancer poses a severe risk to public health and has a substantial financial impact. Tumor markers such as CEA, CA125, CA19-9, and others, as well as the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), are frequently utilized for gastric cancer screening and initial diagnosis. however, False-positive results of FOBT and other markers will cause needless mental suffering, costly examination costs, examination injuries, and other unfavorable consequences. False-negative results of FOBT and other markers will cause treatment to be delayed, which will force patients to suffer from a poor prognosis, high treatment costs, a low quality of life, and a short survival period. Finding practical, affordable, and non-invasive diagnostic techniques is crucial to lowering the false-positive and false-negative rates of FOBT and other markers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in gastric cancer.\nPatients and methods: This study included 602 subjects (Malignant group, n=222; Benign group, n=380 cases). The remaining serum samples of the subjects were collected and the sensitivity and specificity of the YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS were evaluated using the YiDiXie™ all-cancer detection kit. Results: The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-SS in patients with positive FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 were 100% (95% CI: 77.2%-100%), 96.7% (95% CI: 83.3% - 99.8%), 95.5% (95% CI: 78.2%- 99.8%), 97.1% (95% CI: 85.1%- 99.8%); The Specificity degrees were 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%- 98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0%- 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0%- 94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4%-87.9%). This means that the application of YiDiXie™-SS, without basically increasing the missed diagnosis of malignant tumors, reduced the false-positive rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 by 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%-98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0% - 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0% -94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4% -87.9%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS in FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 negative patients was 96.5% (95%CI: 90.2-99.0%) and 96.8% (95%CI: 93.2% - 98.5%), 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8%- 98.8%), 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0%- 98.5%); The specific degrees were 86.4% (95% CI: 66.7%- 95.3%), 89.3% (95% CI: 85.7%- 92.1%), 89.5% (95% CI: 84.6%- 93.0%), 90.4% (95% CI: 86.8%-93.1%). This means that YiDiXie™-HS reduced false-negatives for FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 by 96.5% (95% CI: 90.2% to 99.0%) and 96.8% (95% CI: 93.2% - 98.5%), 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8%- 98.8%), 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0%- 98.5%).\nConclusion: YiDiXie™-SS significantly reduced false-positive rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 without substantially increasing delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie™-HS significantly reduced false-negative rates for FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9. YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS have important diagnostic value in gastric cancer, and are expected to solve the two problems of \"high false-positive rate of FOBT and other markers\" and \"high false-negative rate of FOBT and other markers\" in gastric cancer. Clinical Research Registration Number:ChiCTR2200066840.\nKeywords: Gastric cancer, Fecal occult blood test, CEA, CA125, CA19-9, False-positive, False-negative, YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS","PeriodicalId":501437,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Oncology","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in gastric cancer\",\"authors\":\"Huimei Zhou, Chen Sun, Yanrong Qi, Yutong Wu, Xutai Li, Zhenjian Ge, Wenkang Chen, Yingqi Li, Pengwu Zhang, Shengjie Lin, Wuping Wang, Siwei Chen, Wei Li, Xi Li, Ling Ji, Yongqing Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.21.24312336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Gastric cancer poses a severe risk to public health and has a substantial financial impact. Tumor markers such as CEA, CA125, CA19-9, and others, as well as the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), are frequently utilized for gastric cancer screening and initial diagnosis. however, False-positive results of FOBT and other markers will cause needless mental suffering, costly examination costs, examination injuries, and other unfavorable consequences. False-negative results of FOBT and other markers will cause treatment to be delayed, which will force patients to suffer from a poor prognosis, high treatment costs, a low quality of life, and a short survival period. Finding practical, affordable, and non-invasive diagnostic techniques is crucial to lowering the false-positive and false-negative rates of FOBT and other markers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in gastric cancer.\\nPatients and methods: This study included 602 subjects (Malignant group, n=222; Benign group, n=380 cases). The remaining serum samples of the subjects were collected and the sensitivity and specificity of the YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS were evaluated using the YiDiXie™ all-cancer detection kit. Results: The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-SS in patients with positive FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 were 100% (95% CI: 77.2%-100%), 96.7% (95% CI: 83.3% - 99.8%), 95.5% (95% CI: 78.2%- 99.8%), 97.1% (95% CI: 85.1%- 99.8%); The Specificity degrees were 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%- 98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0%- 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0%- 94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4%-87.9%). This means that the application of YiDiXie™-SS, without basically increasing the missed diagnosis of malignant tumors, reduced the false-positive rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 by 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%-98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0% - 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0% -94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4% -87.9%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS in FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 negative patients was 96.5% (95%CI: 90.2-99.0%) and 96.8% (95%CI: 93.2% - 98.5%), 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8%- 98.8%), 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0%- 98.5%); The specific degrees were 86.4% (95% CI: 66.7%- 95.3%), 89.3% (95% CI: 85.7%- 92.1%), 89.5% (95% CI: 84.6%- 93.0%), 90.4% (95% CI: 86.8%-93.1%). This means that YiDiXie™-HS reduced false-negatives for FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 by 96.5% (95% CI: 90.2% to 99.0%) and 96.8% (95% CI: 93.2% - 98.5%), 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8%- 98.8%), 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0%- 98.5%).\\nConclusion: YiDiXie™-SS significantly reduced false-positive rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 without substantially increasing delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie™-HS significantly reduced false-negative rates for FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9. YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS have important diagnostic value in gastric cancer, and are expected to solve the two problems of \\\"high false-positive rate of FOBT and other markers\\\" and \\\"high false-negative rate of FOBT and other markers\\\" in gastric cancer. Clinical Research Registration Number:ChiCTR2200066840.\\nKeywords: Gastric cancer, Fecal occult blood test, CEA, CA125, CA19-9, False-positive, False-negative, YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS\",\"PeriodicalId\":501437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Oncology\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.21.24312336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.21.24312336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胃癌对公众健康构成严重威胁,并产生巨大的经济影响。CEA、CA125、CA19-9 等肿瘤标志物以及粪便潜血试验(FOBT)经常被用于胃癌筛查和初步诊断。然而,FOBT 和其他标志物的假阳性结果将造成不必要的精神痛苦、昂贵的检查费用、检查损伤和其他不利后果。糞便隱血測試和其他指標的假陰性結果會導致治療延誤,使患者被迫承受預後不佳、治療費用高昂、生活質素低下和存活期短的痛苦。要降低 FOBT 和其他标记物的假阳性率和假阴性率,找到实用、经济、无创的诊断技术至关重要。本研究旨在评估 YiDiXie™-SS 和 YiDiXie™-HS 对胃癌的诊断价值:本研究包括 602 名受试者(恶性组,n=222;良性组,n=380 例)。收集受试者的剩余血清样本,使用 YiDiXie™ 全癌检测试剂盒评估 YiDiXie™-SS 和 YiDiXie™-HS 的灵敏度和特异性。结果YiDiXie™-SS对FOBT、CEA、CA125和CA19-9阳性患者的灵敏度分别为100%(95% CI:77.2%-100%)、96.7%(95% CI:83.3% - 99.8%)、95.5%(95% CI:78.2% - 99.特异度为 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%- 98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0%- 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0%- 94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4%-87.9%) 。这说明在不增加恶性肿瘤漏诊率的前提下,应用 YiDiXie™-SS 降低了 FOBT、CEA、CA125 和 CA19-9 的假阳性率 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%-98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0% - 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0% - 94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4% -87.9%)。YiDiXie™-HS对FOBT、CEA、CA125和CA19-9阴性患者的敏感性分别为96.5%(95%CI:90.2-99.0%)、96.8%(95%CI:93.2%-98.5%)、97.3%(95%CI:93.8%-98.8%)、96.7%(95% CI:93.0%- 98.5%);具体程度分别为 86.4%(95% CI:66.7%- 95.3%)、89.3%(95% CI:85.7%- 92.1%)、89.5%(95% CI:84.6%- 93.0%)、90.4%(95% CI:86.8%-93.1%)。这意味着YiDiXie™-HS可将FOBT、CEA、CA125和CA19-9的假阴性率分别降低96.5%(95% CI:90.2%-99.0%)、96.8%(95% CI:93.2%-98.5%)、97.3%(95% CI:93.8%-98.8%)、96.7%(95% CI:93.0%-98.5%):结论:YiDiXie™-SS可显著降低FOBT、CEA、CA125和CA19-9的假阳性率,且不会大幅增加恶性肿瘤的延迟治疗率。YiDiXie™-HS 可明显降低 FOBT、CEA、CA125 和 CA19-9 的假阴性率。YiDiXie™-SS和YiDiXie™-HS对胃癌具有重要的诊断价值,有望解决胃癌 "FOBT等标志物假阳性率高 "和 "FOBT等标志物假阴性率高 "的两大难题。临床研究注册号:ChiCTR2200066840:胃癌 大便潜血试验 CEA CA125 CA19-9 假阳性 假阴性 易迪协™-SS 易迪协™-HS
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in gastric cancer
Background: Gastric cancer poses a severe risk to public health and has a substantial financial impact. Tumor markers such as CEA, CA125, CA19-9, and others, as well as the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), are frequently utilized for gastric cancer screening and initial diagnosis. however, False-positive results of FOBT and other markers will cause needless mental suffering, costly examination costs, examination injuries, and other unfavorable consequences. False-negative results of FOBT and other markers will cause treatment to be delayed, which will force patients to suffer from a poor prognosis, high treatment costs, a low quality of life, and a short survival period. Finding practical, affordable, and non-invasive diagnostic techniques is crucial to lowering the false-positive and false-negative rates of FOBT and other markers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in gastric cancer. Patients and methods: This study included 602 subjects (Malignant group, n=222; Benign group, n=380 cases). The remaining serum samples of the subjects were collected and the sensitivity and specificity of the YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS were evaluated using the YiDiXie™ all-cancer detection kit. Results: The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-SS in patients with positive FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 were 100% (95% CI: 77.2%-100%), 96.7% (95% CI: 83.3% - 99.8%), 95.5% (95% CI: 78.2%- 99.8%), 97.1% (95% CI: 85.1%- 99.8%); The Specificity degrees were 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%- 98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0%- 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0%- 94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4%-87.9%). This means that the application of YiDiXie™-SS, without basically increasing the missed diagnosis of malignant tumors, reduced the false-positive rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 by 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%-98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0% - 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0% -94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4% -87.9%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS in FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 negative patients was 96.5% (95%CI: 90.2-99.0%) and 96.8% (95%CI: 93.2% - 98.5%), 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8%- 98.8%), 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0%- 98.5%); The specific degrees were 86.4% (95% CI: 66.7%- 95.3%), 89.3% (95% CI: 85.7%- 92.1%), 89.5% (95% CI: 84.6%- 93.0%), 90.4% (95% CI: 86.8%-93.1%). This means that YiDiXie™-HS reduced false-negatives for FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 by 96.5% (95% CI: 90.2% to 99.0%) and 96.8% (95% CI: 93.2% - 98.5%), 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8%- 98.8%), 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0%- 98.5%). Conclusion: YiDiXie™-SS significantly reduced false-positive rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 without substantially increasing delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie™-HS significantly reduced false-negative rates for FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9. YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS have important diagnostic value in gastric cancer, and are expected to solve the two problems of "high false-positive rate of FOBT and other markers" and "high false-negative rate of FOBT and other markers" in gastric cancer. Clinical Research Registration Number:ChiCTR2200066840. Keywords: Gastric cancer, Fecal occult blood test, CEA, CA125, CA19-9, False-positive, False-negative, YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信