了解美国减低伤害的未来：对加州选民看法的长期分析

IF 1.2 4区社会学 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE

Journal of Drug Issues Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1177/00220426241278664

Maryanne Alderson Diaz, Ryan Fischer, Dina Perrone

{"title":"了解美国减低伤害的未来：对加州选民看法的长期分析","authors":"Maryanne Alderson Diaz, Ryan Fischer, Dina Perrone","doi":"10.1177/00220426241278664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the ongoing opioid epidemic, evidence-based interventions are needed to prevent and respond to opioid-related overdoses. Overdose prevention sites (OPS) have been operating effectively internationally since the 1980s. In the United States, despite unprecedented numbers of overdose-related deaths, only two sites operate in New York City. California, generally a beacon of progressive policy, has been unable to implement a sanctioned facility. Using two waves of survey data (2017 and 2022), this paper seeks to answer the following research questions: (1) Do CA voters support overdose prevention sites? (2) How has support changed over time? And, (3) What factors contribute to the support and opposition of these programs? Results reveal that most respondents would support an OPS in California, despite the recent veto of such measures by California Governor Newsom. Further analyses examine factors that contribute to both support and opposition, as well as exploring potential avenues for reform.","PeriodicalId":15626,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Issues","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Future of Harm Reduction in the United States: An Over-Time Analysis of California Voter Perceptions\",\"authors\":\"Maryanne Alderson Diaz, Ryan Fischer, Dina Perrone\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00220426241278664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the ongoing opioid epidemic, evidence-based interventions are needed to prevent and respond to opioid-related overdoses. Overdose prevention sites (OPS) have been operating effectively internationally since the 1980s. In the United States, despite unprecedented numbers of overdose-related deaths, only two sites operate in New York City. California, generally a beacon of progressive policy, has been unable to implement a sanctioned facility. Using two waves of survey data (2017 and 2022), this paper seeks to answer the following research questions: (1) Do CA voters support overdose prevention sites? (2) How has support changed over time? And, (3) What factors contribute to the support and opposition of these programs? Results reveal that most respondents would support an OPS in California, despite the recent veto of such measures by California Governor Newsom. Further analyses examine factors that contribute to both support and opposition, as well as exploring potential avenues for reform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Drug Issues\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Drug Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220426241278664\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220426241278664","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

随着阿片类药物的持续流行，需要采取循证干预措施来预防和应对与阿片类药物相关的用药过量。自 20 世纪 80 年代以来，过量用药预防点（OPS）在国际上一直有效运行。在美国，尽管与用药过量相关的死亡人数达到了前所未有的水平，但纽约市只有两个站点在运营。加利福尼亚州通常是进步政策的灯塔，但一直未能实施认可的设施。利用两波调查数据（2017 年和 2022 年），本文试图回答以下研究问题：（1）加州选民是否支持药物过量预防点？(2）随着时间的推移，支持率有何变化？3）支持和反对这些计划的因素有哪些？结果显示，尽管加利福尼亚州州长纽森最近否决了此类措施，但大多数受访者仍支持在加利福尼亚州设立过量用药预防点。进一步的分析研究了导致支持和反对的因素，并探讨了潜在的改革途径。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Understanding the Future of Harm Reduction in the United States: An Over-Time Analysis of California Voter Perceptions

With the ongoing opioid epidemic, evidence-based interventions are needed to prevent and respond to opioid-related overdoses. Overdose prevention sites (OPS) have been operating effectively internationally since the 1980s. In the United States, despite unprecedented numbers of overdose-related deaths, only two sites operate in New York City. California, generally a beacon of progressive policy, has been unable to implement a sanctioned facility. Using two waves of survey data (2017 and 2022), this paper seeks to answer the following research questions: (1) Do CA voters support overdose prevention sites? (2) How has support changed over time? And, (3) What factors contribute to the support and opposition of these programs? Results reveal that most respondents would support an OPS in California, despite the recent veto of such measures by California Governor Newsom. Further analyses examine factors that contribute to both support and opposition, as well as exploring potential avenues for reform.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Drug Issues SUBSTANCE ABUSE-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

11.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Drug Issues (JDI) was incorporated as a nonprofit entity in the State of Florida in 1971. In 1996, JDI was transferred to the Florida State University College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, and the Richard L. Rachin Endowment was established to support its continued publication. Since its inception, JDI has been dedicated to providing a professional and scholarly forum centered on the national and international problems associated with drugs, especially illicit drugs. It is a refereed publication with international contributors and subscribers. As a leader in its field, JDI is an instrument widely used by research scholars, public policy analysts, and those involved in the day-to-day struggle against the problem of drug abuse.