{"title":"分配不可分割物品的公平机制","authors":"Ryoga Mahara, Ryuhei Mizutani, Taihei Oki, Tomohiko Yokoyama","doi":"arxiv-2409.06423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the fair division problem for indivisible goods, mechanisms that output\nallocations satisfying fairness concepts, such as envy-freeness up to one good\n(EF1), have been extensively studied. These mechanisms usually require an\narbitrary order of agents as input, which may cause some agents to feel unfair\nsince the order affects the output allocations. In the context of the\ncake-cutting problem, Manabe and Okamoto (2012) introduced meta-envy-freeness\nto capture such kind of fairness, which guarantees the absence of envy compared\nto different orders of agents. In this paper, we introduce position envy-freeness and its relaxation,\nposition envy-freeness up to $k$ goods (PEF$k$), for mechanisms in the fair\ndivision problem for indivisible goods, analogous to the meta-envy-freeness.\nWhile the round-robin or the envy-cycle mechanism is not PEF1, we propose a\nPEF1 mechanism that always outputs an EF1 allocation. In addition, in the case\nof two agents, we prove that any mechanism that always returns a maximum Nash\nsocial welfare allocation is PEF1, and propose a modified adjusted winner\nmechanism satisfying PEF1. We further investigate the round-robin and the\nenvy-cycle mechanisms to measure how far they are from position envy-freeness.","PeriodicalId":501525,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Position Fair Mechanisms Allocating Indivisible Goods\",\"authors\":\"Ryoga Mahara, Ryuhei Mizutani, Taihei Oki, Tomohiko Yokoyama\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.06423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the fair division problem for indivisible goods, mechanisms that output\\nallocations satisfying fairness concepts, such as envy-freeness up to one good\\n(EF1), have been extensively studied. These mechanisms usually require an\\narbitrary order of agents as input, which may cause some agents to feel unfair\\nsince the order affects the output allocations. In the context of the\\ncake-cutting problem, Manabe and Okamoto (2012) introduced meta-envy-freeness\\nto capture such kind of fairness, which guarantees the absence of envy compared\\nto different orders of agents. In this paper, we introduce position envy-freeness and its relaxation,\\nposition envy-freeness up to $k$ goods (PEF$k$), for mechanisms in the fair\\ndivision problem for indivisible goods, analogous to the meta-envy-freeness.\\nWhile the round-robin or the envy-cycle mechanism is not PEF1, we propose a\\nPEF1 mechanism that always outputs an EF1 allocation. In addition, in the case\\nof two agents, we prove that any mechanism that always returns a maximum Nash\\nsocial welfare allocation is PEF1, and propose a modified adjusted winner\\nmechanism satisfying PEF1. We further investigate the round-robin and the\\nenvy-cycle mechanisms to measure how far they are from position envy-freeness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在不可分割物品的公平分配问题中,人们广泛地研究了能够产出满足公平概念的分配机制,例如妒忌-无吝啬(envy-freeness up to one good,EF1)。这些机制通常需要一个任意的代理人顺序作为输入,这可能会让一些代理人感到不公平,因为顺序会影响输出分配。在切蛋糕问题中,Manabe 和 Okamoto(2012)引入了元嫉妒自由度来捕捉这种公平性,它保证了不同顺序的代理人之间不存在嫉妒。在本文中,我们为不可分割物品的公平分割问题中的机制引入了位置嫉妒无穷性及其松弛(位置嫉妒无穷性高达 $k$物品(PEF$k$)),类似于元嫉妒无穷性。虽然轮回或嫉妒循环机制不是 PEF1,但我们提出了一种总是输出 EF1 分配的 PEF1 机制。此外,在两个代理人的情况下,我们证明了任何总是返回最大纳什社会福利分配的机制都是 PEF1,并提出了一种满足 PEF1 的修正调整赢家机制。我们进一步研究了循环机制和嫉妒循环机制,以衡量它们距离无嫉妒位置有多远。
Position Fair Mechanisms Allocating Indivisible Goods
In the fair division problem for indivisible goods, mechanisms that output
allocations satisfying fairness concepts, such as envy-freeness up to one good
(EF1), have been extensively studied. These mechanisms usually require an
arbitrary order of agents as input, which may cause some agents to feel unfair
since the order affects the output allocations. In the context of the
cake-cutting problem, Manabe and Okamoto (2012) introduced meta-envy-freeness
to capture such kind of fairness, which guarantees the absence of envy compared
to different orders of agents. In this paper, we introduce position envy-freeness and its relaxation,
position envy-freeness up to $k$ goods (PEF$k$), for mechanisms in the fair
division problem for indivisible goods, analogous to the meta-envy-freeness.
While the round-robin or the envy-cycle mechanism is not PEF1, we propose a
PEF1 mechanism that always outputs an EF1 allocation. In addition, in the case
of two agents, we prove that any mechanism that always returns a maximum Nash
social welfare allocation is PEF1, and propose a modified adjusted winner
mechanism satisfying PEF1. We further investigate the round-robin and the
envy-cycle mechanisms to measure how far they are from position envy-freeness.