分配不可分割物品的公平机制

Ryoga Mahara, Ryuhei Mizutani, Taihei Oki, Tomohiko Yokoyama
{"title":"分配不可分割物品的公平机制","authors":"Ryoga Mahara, Ryuhei Mizutani, Taihei Oki, Tomohiko Yokoyama","doi":"arxiv-2409.06423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the fair division problem for indivisible goods, mechanisms that output\nallocations satisfying fairness concepts, such as envy-freeness up to one good\n(EF1), have been extensively studied. These mechanisms usually require an\narbitrary order of agents as input, which may cause some agents to feel unfair\nsince the order affects the output allocations. In the context of the\ncake-cutting problem, Manabe and Okamoto (2012) introduced meta-envy-freeness\nto capture such kind of fairness, which guarantees the absence of envy compared\nto different orders of agents. In this paper, we introduce position envy-freeness and its relaxation,\nposition envy-freeness up to $k$ goods (PEF$k$), for mechanisms in the fair\ndivision problem for indivisible goods, analogous to the meta-envy-freeness.\nWhile the round-robin or the envy-cycle mechanism is not PEF1, we propose a\nPEF1 mechanism that always outputs an EF1 allocation. In addition, in the case\nof two agents, we prove that any mechanism that always returns a maximum Nash\nsocial welfare allocation is PEF1, and propose a modified adjusted winner\nmechanism satisfying PEF1. We further investigate the round-robin and the\nenvy-cycle mechanisms to measure how far they are from position envy-freeness.","PeriodicalId":501525,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Position Fair Mechanisms Allocating Indivisible Goods\",\"authors\":\"Ryoga Mahara, Ryuhei Mizutani, Taihei Oki, Tomohiko Yokoyama\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.06423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the fair division problem for indivisible goods, mechanisms that output\\nallocations satisfying fairness concepts, such as envy-freeness up to one good\\n(EF1), have been extensively studied. These mechanisms usually require an\\narbitrary order of agents as input, which may cause some agents to feel unfair\\nsince the order affects the output allocations. In the context of the\\ncake-cutting problem, Manabe and Okamoto (2012) introduced meta-envy-freeness\\nto capture such kind of fairness, which guarantees the absence of envy compared\\nto different orders of agents. In this paper, we introduce position envy-freeness and its relaxation,\\nposition envy-freeness up to $k$ goods (PEF$k$), for mechanisms in the fair\\ndivision problem for indivisible goods, analogous to the meta-envy-freeness.\\nWhile the round-robin or the envy-cycle mechanism is not PEF1, we propose a\\nPEF1 mechanism that always outputs an EF1 allocation. In addition, in the case\\nof two agents, we prove that any mechanism that always returns a maximum Nash\\nsocial welfare allocation is PEF1, and propose a modified adjusted winner\\nmechanism satisfying PEF1. We further investigate the round-robin and the\\nenvy-cycle mechanisms to measure how far they are from position envy-freeness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在不可分割物品的公平分配问题中,人们广泛地研究了能够产出满足公平概念的分配机制,例如妒忌-无吝啬(envy-freeness up to one good,EF1)。这些机制通常需要一个任意的代理人顺序作为输入,这可能会让一些代理人感到不公平,因为顺序会影响输出分配。在切蛋糕问题中,Manabe 和 Okamoto(2012)引入了元嫉妒自由度来捕捉这种公平性,它保证了不同顺序的代理人之间不存在嫉妒。在本文中,我们为不可分割物品的公平分割问题中的机制引入了位置嫉妒无穷性及其松弛(位置嫉妒无穷性高达 $k$物品(PEF$k$)),类似于元嫉妒无穷性。虽然轮回或嫉妒循环机制不是 PEF1,但我们提出了一种总是输出 EF1 分配的 PEF1 机制。此外,在两个代理人的情况下,我们证明了任何总是返回最大纳什社会福利分配的机制都是 PEF1,并提出了一种满足 PEF1 的修正调整赢家机制。我们进一步研究了循环机制和嫉妒循环机制,以衡量它们距离无嫉妒位置有多远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Position Fair Mechanisms Allocating Indivisible Goods
In the fair division problem for indivisible goods, mechanisms that output allocations satisfying fairness concepts, such as envy-freeness up to one good (EF1), have been extensively studied. These mechanisms usually require an arbitrary order of agents as input, which may cause some agents to feel unfair since the order affects the output allocations. In the context of the cake-cutting problem, Manabe and Okamoto (2012) introduced meta-envy-freeness to capture such kind of fairness, which guarantees the absence of envy compared to different orders of agents. In this paper, we introduce position envy-freeness and its relaxation, position envy-freeness up to $k$ goods (PEF$k$), for mechanisms in the fair division problem for indivisible goods, analogous to the meta-envy-freeness. While the round-robin or the envy-cycle mechanism is not PEF1, we propose a PEF1 mechanism that always outputs an EF1 allocation. In addition, in the case of two agents, we prove that any mechanism that always returns a maximum Nash social welfare allocation is PEF1, and propose a modified adjusted winner mechanism satisfying PEF1. We further investigate the round-robin and the envy-cycle mechanisms to measure how far they are from position envy-freeness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信