杜梅特的真理源泉理论

IF 0.6 3区 数学 Q2 LOGIC
Alex Belikov, Evgeny Loginov
{"title":"杜梅特的真理源泉理论","authors":"Alex Belikov, Evgeny Loginov","doi":"10.1007/s11225-024-10146-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In his seminal paper ‘Truth’, M. Dummett considered negated conditional statements as one of the main motivations for introducing a three-valued logical framework. He left a sketch of an implication connective that, as we observe, shares some intuitions with Wansing-style account for connexivity. In this article, we discuss Dummett’s ‘unfinished’ implication and suggest two possible reconstructions of it. One of them collapses into implication from W. Cooper’s ‘Logic of Ordinary Discourse’ <span>\\(\\textbf{OL}\\)</span> and J. Cantwell’s ‘Logic of Conditional Negation’ <span>\\(\\textbf{CN}\\)</span>, whereas the other turns out to be previously unknown implication connective and can be used to obtain a novel logical system, entitled here as <span>\\(\\textbf{cRM}_\\textbf{3}\\)</span>. As to the technical results, we introduce a sound and complete axiomatic proof-system for <span>\\(\\textbf{cRM}_\\textbf{3}\\)</span> and present a theorem for the semantic embedding of <span>\\(\\textbf{CN}\\)</span> into <span>\\(\\textbf{cRM}_\\textbf{3}\\)</span>.</p>","PeriodicalId":48979,"journal":{"name":"Studia Logica","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dummett’s Theory of Truth as a Source of Connexivity\",\"authors\":\"Alex Belikov, Evgeny Loginov\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11225-024-10146-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In his seminal paper ‘Truth’, M. Dummett considered negated conditional statements as one of the main motivations for introducing a three-valued logical framework. He left a sketch of an implication connective that, as we observe, shares some intuitions with Wansing-style account for connexivity. In this article, we discuss Dummett’s ‘unfinished’ implication and suggest two possible reconstructions of it. One of them collapses into implication from W. Cooper’s ‘Logic of Ordinary Discourse’ <span>\\\\(\\\\textbf{OL}\\\\)</span> and J. Cantwell’s ‘Logic of Conditional Negation’ <span>\\\\(\\\\textbf{CN}\\\\)</span>, whereas the other turns out to be previously unknown implication connective and can be used to obtain a novel logical system, entitled here as <span>\\\\(\\\\textbf{cRM}_\\\\textbf{3}\\\\)</span>. As to the technical results, we introduce a sound and complete axiomatic proof-system for <span>\\\\(\\\\textbf{cRM}_\\\\textbf{3}\\\\)</span> and present a theorem for the semantic embedding of <span>\\\\(\\\\textbf{CN}\\\\)</span> into <span>\\\\(\\\\textbf{cRM}_\\\\textbf{3}\\\\)</span>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Logica\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Logica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-024-10146-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Logica","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-024-10146-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

杜梅特(M. Dummett)在其开创性论文《真理》中,将否定条件语句视为引入三值逻辑框架的主要动机之一。他留下了一个蕴涵连接词的草图,正如我们所观察到的,这个蕴涵连接词与万辛式的连接性解释有一些相同的直觉。在本文中,我们将讨论杜梅特的 "未完成 "蕴涵,并提出两种可能的重建方案。其中一个可以从库珀(W. Cooper)的 "普通话语逻辑学"(Logic of Ordinary Discourse)和坎特韦尔(J. Cantwell)的 "条件否定逻辑学"(Logic of Conditional Negation)中折叠成蕴涵,而另一个则是以前未知的蕴涵连接词,可以用来得到一个新的逻辑体系,本文称之为(\textbf{cRM}_\textbf{3}\)。在技术成果方面,我们为\(textbf{cRM}_\textbf{3}\)引入了一个健全而完整的公理证明系统,并提出了一个将\(textbf{CN}\)语义嵌入\(textbf{cRM}_\textbf{3}\)的定理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dummett’s Theory of Truth as a Source of Connexivity

In his seminal paper ‘Truth’, M. Dummett considered negated conditional statements as one of the main motivations for introducing a three-valued logical framework. He left a sketch of an implication connective that, as we observe, shares some intuitions with Wansing-style account for connexivity. In this article, we discuss Dummett’s ‘unfinished’ implication and suggest two possible reconstructions of it. One of them collapses into implication from W. Cooper’s ‘Logic of Ordinary Discourse’ \(\textbf{OL}\) and J. Cantwell’s ‘Logic of Conditional Negation’ \(\textbf{CN}\), whereas the other turns out to be previously unknown implication connective and can be used to obtain a novel logical system, entitled here as \(\textbf{cRM}_\textbf{3}\). As to the technical results, we introduce a sound and complete axiomatic proof-system for \(\textbf{cRM}_\textbf{3}\) and present a theorem for the semantic embedding of \(\textbf{CN}\) into \(\textbf{cRM}_\textbf{3}\).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Logica
Studia Logica MATHEMATICS-LOGIC
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading idea of Lvov-Warsaw School of Logic, Philosophy and Mathematics was to investigate philosophical problems by means of rigorous methods of mathematics. Evidence of the great success the School experienced is the fact that it has become generally recognized as Polish Style Logic. Today Polish Style Logic is no longer exclusively a Polish speciality. It is represented by numerous logicians, mathematicians and philosophers from research centers all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信