从最大熵原理推导出的贝叶斯推理和频数推理,在传播统计方法的不确定性方面的应用

IF 1.2 3区 数学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
David R. Bickel
{"title":"从最大熵原理推导出的贝叶斯推理和频数推理,在传播统计方法的不确定性方面的应用","authors":"David R. Bickel","doi":"10.1007/s00362-024-01597-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Using statistical methods to analyze data requires considering the data set to be randomly generated from a probability distribution that is unknown but idealized according to a mathematical model consisting of constraints, assumptions about the distribution. Since the choice of such a model is up to the scientist, there is an understandable bias toward choosing models that make scientific conclusions appear more certain than they really are. There is a similar bias in the scientist’s choice of whether to use Bayesian or frequentist methods. This article provides tools to mitigate both of those biases on the basis of a principle of information theory. It is found that the same principle unifies Bayesianism with the fiducial version of frequentism. The principle arguably overcomes not only the main objections against fiducial inference but also the main Bayesian objection against the use of confidence intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":51166,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Papers","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian and frequentist inference derived from the maximum entropy principle with applications to propagating uncertainty about statistical methods\",\"authors\":\"David R. Bickel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00362-024-01597-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Using statistical methods to analyze data requires considering the data set to be randomly generated from a probability distribution that is unknown but idealized according to a mathematical model consisting of constraints, assumptions about the distribution. Since the choice of such a model is up to the scientist, there is an understandable bias toward choosing models that make scientific conclusions appear more certain than they really are. There is a similar bias in the scientist’s choice of whether to use Bayesian or frequentist methods. This article provides tools to mitigate both of those biases on the basis of a principle of information theory. It is found that the same principle unifies Bayesianism with the fiducial version of frequentism. The principle arguably overcomes not only the main objections against fiducial inference but also the main Bayesian objection against the use of confidence intervals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Papers\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-024-01597-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Papers","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-024-01597-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用统计方法分析数据需要考虑到数据集是从一个未知的概率分布中随机生成的,但根据一个数学模型进行了理想化,该数学模型由有关分布的约束条件和假设组成。由于这种模型的选择是由科学家决定的,因此存在一种可以理解的偏差,即选择那些能使科学结论看起来比实际情况更确定的模型。科学家在选择使用贝叶斯方法还是频数方法时也存在类似的偏差。本文根据信息论原理,提供了减轻这两种偏差的工具。研究发现,同一原则将贝叶斯主义与频数主义的信条版本统一起来。可以说,该原理不仅克服了对信实推理的主要反对意见,也克服了贝叶斯主义对使用置信区间的主要反对意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bayesian and frequentist inference derived from the maximum entropy principle with applications to propagating uncertainty about statistical methods

Bayesian and frequentist inference derived from the maximum entropy principle with applications to propagating uncertainty about statistical methods

Using statistical methods to analyze data requires considering the data set to be randomly generated from a probability distribution that is unknown but idealized according to a mathematical model consisting of constraints, assumptions about the distribution. Since the choice of such a model is up to the scientist, there is an understandable bias toward choosing models that make scientific conclusions appear more certain than they really are. There is a similar bias in the scientist’s choice of whether to use Bayesian or frequentist methods. This article provides tools to mitigate both of those biases on the basis of a principle of information theory. It is found that the same principle unifies Bayesianism with the fiducial version of frequentism. The principle arguably overcomes not only the main objections against fiducial inference but also the main Bayesian objection against the use of confidence intervals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Papers
Statistical Papers 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Statistical Papers addresses itself to all persons and organizations that have to deal with statistical methods in their own field of work. It attempts to provide a forum for the presentation and critical assessment of statistical methods, in particular for the discussion of their methodological foundations as well as their potential applications. Methods that have broad applications will be preferred. However, special attention is given to those statistical methods which are relevant to the economic and social sciences. In addition to original research papers, readers will find survey articles, short notes, reports on statistical software, problem section, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信