{"title":"卡利斯托上的陨石坑形态测量","authors":"V. J. Bray, P. M. Schenk","doi":"10.3847/psj/ad61dd","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Impact crater formation is affected by the physical properties of planetary crusts, allowing comparison of crater dimensions to serve as a proxy for comparing the crustal properties of different planetary bodies. New topographic profiles of Callisto craters, derived from Galileo-based digital terrain models, are presented, and the crater dimensions recorded. These data were used to derive crater morphometry scaling trends, which were then compared to the established trends of Ganymede and the Moon. Our comparative study suggests that the upper brittle portion of Callisto’s ice crust allows for the retention of steep-sided and elevated rim scarps, while subsurface warmer ice leads to an enhanced uplift and shallowing of the crater bowl. Crater dimensions are similar between Callisto and Ganymede, suggesting that the bulk properties of their near-surface crusts are comparable. The most notable difference between craters on these two Galilean moons were the smaller central pit diameters on Callisto. This difference can be explained if the pit formation on these bodies is controlled by the presence and movement (drainage and/or volatile loss) of impact melt water: the lower impact velocity and/or lower expected crustal heat flow on Callisto will result in less impact melt generation, and thus smaller central pits.","PeriodicalId":34524,"journal":{"name":"The Planetary Science Journal","volume":"166 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crater Morphometry on Callisto\",\"authors\":\"V. J. Bray, P. M. Schenk\",\"doi\":\"10.3847/psj/ad61dd\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Impact crater formation is affected by the physical properties of planetary crusts, allowing comparison of crater dimensions to serve as a proxy for comparing the crustal properties of different planetary bodies. New topographic profiles of Callisto craters, derived from Galileo-based digital terrain models, are presented, and the crater dimensions recorded. These data were used to derive crater morphometry scaling trends, which were then compared to the established trends of Ganymede and the Moon. Our comparative study suggests that the upper brittle portion of Callisto’s ice crust allows for the retention of steep-sided and elevated rim scarps, while subsurface warmer ice leads to an enhanced uplift and shallowing of the crater bowl. Crater dimensions are similar between Callisto and Ganymede, suggesting that the bulk properties of their near-surface crusts are comparable. The most notable difference between craters on these two Galilean moons were the smaller central pit diameters on Callisto. This difference can be explained if the pit formation on these bodies is controlled by the presence and movement (drainage and/or volatile loss) of impact melt water: the lower impact velocity and/or lower expected crustal heat flow on Callisto will result in less impact melt generation, and thus smaller central pits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Planetary Science Journal\",\"volume\":\"166 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Planetary Science Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/ad61dd\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Planetary Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/ad61dd","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact crater formation is affected by the physical properties of planetary crusts, allowing comparison of crater dimensions to serve as a proxy for comparing the crustal properties of different planetary bodies. New topographic profiles of Callisto craters, derived from Galileo-based digital terrain models, are presented, and the crater dimensions recorded. These data were used to derive crater morphometry scaling trends, which were then compared to the established trends of Ganymede and the Moon. Our comparative study suggests that the upper brittle portion of Callisto’s ice crust allows for the retention of steep-sided and elevated rim scarps, while subsurface warmer ice leads to an enhanced uplift and shallowing of the crater bowl. Crater dimensions are similar between Callisto and Ganymede, suggesting that the bulk properties of their near-surface crusts are comparable. The most notable difference between craters on these two Galilean moons were the smaller central pit diameters on Callisto. This difference can be explained if the pit formation on these bodies is controlled by the presence and movement (drainage and/or volatile loss) of impact melt water: the lower impact velocity and/or lower expected crustal heat flow on Callisto will result in less impact melt generation, and thus smaller central pits.