{"title":"弥散裂隙:弥散加权成像诊断胎盘早剥图谱的新发现","authors":"Yuko Iraha, Shinya Fujii, Nanae Tsuchiya, Kimei Azama, Eri Yonamine, Keiko Mekaru, Tadatsugu Kinjo, Masayuki Sekine, Akihiro Nishie","doi":"10.1007/s11604-024-01657-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the usefulness of novel diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) findings for diagnosing placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 49 pregnant women with suspected PAS who underwent 1.5 T placental MRI. Diffusion lacunae were defined as intraplacental areas showing hypointensity on DWI and hyperintensity on the apparent diffusion coefficient map. Two radiologists evaluated the number and size of placental lacunae on DWI, and flow void in the diffusion lacunae on T2-weighted imaging. The radiologists also evaluated established MRI features of PAS described in the SAR-ESUR consensus statement. Pearson's chi-square test or Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare findings between patients with and without PAS. Interobserver reliability for DWI and established MRI features was also assessed. Optimal thresholds for the number and maximum size of diffusion lacunae for differentiating PAS from the no-PAS group were determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Eighteen patients were diagnosed with PAS, and 31 patients with placental previa without PAS. The number and maximum size of diffusion lacunae were significantly larger in patients with than in patients without PAS (p < 0.0001). Combining assessment of the number of diffusion lacunae with assessment of their maximum size yielded a diagnostic performance with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 83%, 94% and 90%, respectively. Flow voids within the diffusion lacunae had sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 88%, 84% and 86%, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The number and size of diffusion lacunae, and T2 flow void in diffusion lacunae may be useful findings for diagnosing PAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diffusion lacunae: a novel MR imaging finding on diffusion-weighted imaging for diagnosing placenta accreta spectrum\",\"authors\":\"Yuko Iraha, Shinya Fujii, Nanae Tsuchiya, Kimei Azama, Eri Yonamine, Keiko Mekaru, Tadatsugu Kinjo, Masayuki Sekine, Akihiro Nishie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-024-01657-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the usefulness of novel diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) findings for diagnosing placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Materials and methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 49 pregnant women with suspected PAS who underwent 1.5 T placental MRI. Diffusion lacunae were defined as intraplacental areas showing hypointensity on DWI and hyperintensity on the apparent diffusion coefficient map. Two radiologists evaluated the number and size of placental lacunae on DWI, and flow void in the diffusion lacunae on T2-weighted imaging. The radiologists also evaluated established MRI features of PAS described in the SAR-ESUR consensus statement. Pearson's chi-square test or Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare findings between patients with and without PAS. Interobserver reliability for DWI and established MRI features was also assessed. Optimal thresholds for the number and maximum size of diffusion lacunae for differentiating PAS from the no-PAS group were determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Eighteen patients were diagnosed with PAS, and 31 patients with placental previa without PAS. The number and maximum size of diffusion lacunae were significantly larger in patients with than in patients without PAS (p < 0.0001). Combining assessment of the number of diffusion lacunae with assessment of their maximum size yielded a diagnostic performance with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 83%, 94% and 90%, respectively. Flow voids within the diffusion lacunae had sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 88%, 84% and 86%, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The number and size of diffusion lacunae, and T2 flow void in diffusion lacunae may be useful findings for diagnosing PAS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01657-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01657-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估新型弥散加权成像(DWI)结果对诊断胎盘早剥谱系(PAS)的有用性。材料和方法这项回顾性研究纳入了 49 名疑似 PAS 的孕妇,她们都接受了 1.5 T 胎盘 MRI 检查。弥散裂隙被定义为在 DWI 上显示低密度和在表观弥散系数图上显示高密度的胎盘内区域。两名放射科医生评估了 DWI 上胎盘裂隙的数量和大小,以及 T2 加权成像上弥散裂隙中的血流空隙。放射科医生还评估了 SAR-ESUR 共识声明中描述的 PAS MRI 既定特征。皮尔逊卡方检验或曼-惠特尼U检验用于比较有PAS和无PAS患者的检查结果。还评估了 DWI 和既定 MRI 特征的观察者间可靠性。使用接收器操作特征曲线分析确定了区分 PAS 和无 PAS 组弥散裂隙数量和最大尺寸的最佳阈值。PAS患者弥散裂隙的数量和最大尺寸均明显大于非PAS患者(p < 0.0001)。将弥散裂隙数量评估与最大尺寸评估相结合,诊断结果的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为83%、94%和90%。结论 弥散裂隙的数量和大小以及弥散裂隙中的T2血流空隙可能是诊断PAS的有用结果。
Diffusion lacunae: a novel MR imaging finding on diffusion-weighted imaging for diagnosing placenta accreta spectrum
Objective
To evaluate the usefulness of novel diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) findings for diagnosing placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
Materials and methods
This retrospective study included 49 pregnant women with suspected PAS who underwent 1.5 T placental MRI. Diffusion lacunae were defined as intraplacental areas showing hypointensity on DWI and hyperintensity on the apparent diffusion coefficient map. Two radiologists evaluated the number and size of placental lacunae on DWI, and flow void in the diffusion lacunae on T2-weighted imaging. The radiologists also evaluated established MRI features of PAS described in the SAR-ESUR consensus statement. Pearson's chi-square test or Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare findings between patients with and without PAS. Interobserver reliability for DWI and established MRI features was also assessed. Optimal thresholds for the number and maximum size of diffusion lacunae for differentiating PAS from the no-PAS group were determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.
Results
Eighteen patients were diagnosed with PAS, and 31 patients with placental previa without PAS. The number and maximum size of diffusion lacunae were significantly larger in patients with than in patients without PAS (p < 0.0001). Combining assessment of the number of diffusion lacunae with assessment of their maximum size yielded a diagnostic performance with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 83%, 94% and 90%, respectively. Flow voids within the diffusion lacunae had sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 88%, 84% and 86%, respectively.
Conclusion
The number and size of diffusion lacunae, and T2 flow void in diffusion lacunae may be useful findings for diagnosing PAS.
期刊介绍:
Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.