为渔业管理和养护提供可操作知识的最佳做法

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cosette Arseneault-Deraps, Raegan Davis, M. E. Cole MacLeod, Erin Wilson, Ben Aubrey, Alyssa Goodenough, Jamie C. Madden, Kevin A. Adeli, Christopher Cvitanovic, Nathan Young, Julie M. Hinderer, Elizabeth A. Nyboer, Vivian M. Nguyen, Morgan L. Piczak, Steven J. Cooke
{"title":"为渔业管理和养护提供可操作知识的最佳做法","authors":"Cosette Arseneault-Deraps, Raegan Davis, M. E. Cole MacLeod, Erin Wilson, Ben Aubrey, Alyssa Goodenough, Jamie C. Madden, Kevin A. Adeli, Christopher Cvitanovic, Nathan Young, Julie M. Hinderer, Elizabeth A. Nyboer, Vivian M. Nguyen, Morgan L. Piczak, Steven J. Cooke","doi":"10.1007/s10641-024-01591-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In applied research, there is an expectation that knowledge generators will produce information that can be acted upon by knowledge end users (i.e., actionable knowledge); however, this is not always the case, resulting in a knowledge-action gap. Currently, there is no literature directly targeted at fisheries knowledge generators (e.g., researchers) to guide them in producing knowledge that could be readily used to inform fisheries management and conservation. To that end, this paper provides evidence-based recommendations for researchers to produce actionable knowledge. Key recommendations include the following: (1) embrace co-production; (2) prioritize capacity building; (3) include Indigenous and local knowledge systems; (4) diversify forms of knowledge exchange; (5) participate in interdisciplinary research; and (6) provide training for early-career researchers on producing actionable knowledge. We also analyze challenges to producing actionable knowledge, such as trust imbalances, costs of engaging in highly collaborative work, and difficulties related to effective knowledge exchange with fast-moving research timeframes, funding restrictions, and lack of institutional support. Using several case studies, we examine how knowledge generators overcome such challenges to successfully implement the key recommendations. It is our hope these recommendations will encourage and facilitate actionable research, contributing to more effective fisheries management and conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best practices for producing actionable knowledge to inform fisheries management and conservation\",\"authors\":\"Cosette Arseneault-Deraps, Raegan Davis, M. E. Cole MacLeod, Erin Wilson, Ben Aubrey, Alyssa Goodenough, Jamie C. Madden, Kevin A. Adeli, Christopher Cvitanovic, Nathan Young, Julie M. Hinderer, Elizabeth A. Nyboer, Vivian M. Nguyen, Morgan L. Piczak, Steven J. Cooke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10641-024-01591-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In applied research, there is an expectation that knowledge generators will produce information that can be acted upon by knowledge end users (i.e., actionable knowledge); however, this is not always the case, resulting in a knowledge-action gap. Currently, there is no literature directly targeted at fisheries knowledge generators (e.g., researchers) to guide them in producing knowledge that could be readily used to inform fisheries management and conservation. To that end, this paper provides evidence-based recommendations for researchers to produce actionable knowledge. Key recommendations include the following: (1) embrace co-production; (2) prioritize capacity building; (3) include Indigenous and local knowledge systems; (4) diversify forms of knowledge exchange; (5) participate in interdisciplinary research; and (6) provide training for early-career researchers on producing actionable knowledge. We also analyze challenges to producing actionable knowledge, such as trust imbalances, costs of engaging in highly collaborative work, and difficulties related to effective knowledge exchange with fast-moving research timeframes, funding restrictions, and lack of institutional support. Using several case studies, we examine how knowledge generators overcome such challenges to successfully implement the key recommendations. It is our hope these recommendations will encourage and facilitate actionable research, contributing to more effective fisheries management and conservation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-024-01591-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-024-01591-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在应用研究中,人们期望知识生成者产生的信息能被知识最终用户采取行动 (即可操作的知识);但情况并非总是如此,造成知识-行动差距。目前,还没有直接针对渔业知识生成者(如研究人员)的文献,指导他们生成可随时用于为渔业管理和养护提供信息的知识。为此,本文为研究人员提供了基于证据的建议,以生成可操作的知识。主要建议如下(1) 接受共同生产;(2) 优先考虑能力建设;(3) 包括土著和当地知识体系;(4) 使知识交流形式多样化;(5) 参与跨学科研究;(6) 为早期职业研究人员提供有关生产可操作知识的培训。我们还分析了产生可操作知识所面临的挑战,如信任失衡、参与高度合作工作的成本,以及在快速发展的研究时间框架、资金限制和缺乏机构支持的情况下进行有效知识交流所面临的困难。通过几个案例研究,我们探讨了知识创造者如何克服这些挑战,成功实施主要建议。我们希望这些建议能够鼓励和促进可操作的研究,为更有效的渔业管理和保护做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Best practices for producing actionable knowledge to inform fisheries management and conservation

Best practices for producing actionable knowledge to inform fisheries management and conservation

In applied research, there is an expectation that knowledge generators will produce information that can be acted upon by knowledge end users (i.e., actionable knowledge); however, this is not always the case, resulting in a knowledge-action gap. Currently, there is no literature directly targeted at fisheries knowledge generators (e.g., researchers) to guide them in producing knowledge that could be readily used to inform fisheries management and conservation. To that end, this paper provides evidence-based recommendations for researchers to produce actionable knowledge. Key recommendations include the following: (1) embrace co-production; (2) prioritize capacity building; (3) include Indigenous and local knowledge systems; (4) diversify forms of knowledge exchange; (5) participate in interdisciplinary research; and (6) provide training for early-career researchers on producing actionable knowledge. We also analyze challenges to producing actionable knowledge, such as trust imbalances, costs of engaging in highly collaborative work, and difficulties related to effective knowledge exchange with fast-moving research timeframes, funding restrictions, and lack of institutional support. Using several case studies, we examine how knowledge generators overcome such challenges to successfully implement the key recommendations. It is our hope these recommendations will encourage and facilitate actionable research, contributing to more effective fisheries management and conservation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信