量化岩石节理的形态并更新考虑到岩体分布的 JRC-JCS 标准

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Feili Wang, Fanzhen Meng, Shuhong Wang, Zhanguo Xiu
{"title":"量化岩石节理的形态并更新考虑到岩体分布的 JRC-JCS 标准","authors":"Feili Wang, Fanzhen Meng, Shuhong Wang, Zhanguo Xiu","doi":"10.1007/s40948-024-00855-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Roughness ubiquitously prevails in rock joints and controls the shear behaviours, permeability and damage characteristics of rock joints. A plethora of investigations have focused on the description of joint roughness; however, a detailed method for quantifying joint roughness and evaluating the shear strength has not yet been established. In this study, within the framework of fractal theory, an optical measurement scale was defined to depict the fractal characteristics of joint roughness, and a boundary measurement scale was used to identify first- and second-order asperities. A composite indicator <span>\\(\\eta\\)</span>, including the fractal roughness coefficient (<span>\\(R_{D}\\)</span>), the coefficient describing the roughness order (<span>\\(\\mu\\)</span>) and the anisotropy parameter (<span>\\(\\lambda\\)</span>), was proposed to quantify the surface morphology, which takes the asperity distribution and roughness anisotropy into account. The relationship between <span>\\(\\eta\\)</span> and JRC was established, and the JRC–JCS criterion was further updated. Moreover, representative examples were given to show the steps required to quantify the morphology of rough joint surfaces with the new quantitative parameter. Direct shear tests were conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in describing joint roughness and estimating joint shear strength; the results indicate that it is appropriate to use <span>\\(\\eta\\)</span> to estimate the joint roughness and that the proposed shear strength criterion can appropriately predict the shear strength within an acceptable error.</p>","PeriodicalId":12813,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the morphology of rock joints and updating the JRC–JCS criterion considering the asperity distribution\",\"authors\":\"Feili Wang, Fanzhen Meng, Shuhong Wang, Zhanguo Xiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40948-024-00855-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Roughness ubiquitously prevails in rock joints and controls the shear behaviours, permeability and damage characteristics of rock joints. A plethora of investigations have focused on the description of joint roughness; however, a detailed method for quantifying joint roughness and evaluating the shear strength has not yet been established. In this study, within the framework of fractal theory, an optical measurement scale was defined to depict the fractal characteristics of joint roughness, and a boundary measurement scale was used to identify first- and second-order asperities. A composite indicator <span>\\\\(\\\\eta\\\\)</span>, including the fractal roughness coefficient (<span>\\\\(R_{D}\\\\)</span>), the coefficient describing the roughness order (<span>\\\\(\\\\mu\\\\)</span>) and the anisotropy parameter (<span>\\\\(\\\\lambda\\\\)</span>), was proposed to quantify the surface morphology, which takes the asperity distribution and roughness anisotropy into account. The relationship between <span>\\\\(\\\\eta\\\\)</span> and JRC was established, and the JRC–JCS criterion was further updated. Moreover, representative examples were given to show the steps required to quantify the morphology of rough joint surfaces with the new quantitative parameter. Direct shear tests were conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in describing joint roughness and estimating joint shear strength; the results indicate that it is appropriate to use <span>\\\\(\\\\eta\\\\)</span> to estimate the joint roughness and that the proposed shear strength criterion can appropriately predict the shear strength within an acceptable error.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-024-00855-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-024-00855-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

岩石节理中普遍存在粗糙度,它控制着岩石节理的剪切行为、渗透性和破坏特征。大量研究都集中在对节理粗糙度的描述上,然而,量化节理粗糙度和评估抗剪强度的详细方法尚未建立。本研究在分形理论的框架内,定义了一种光学测量尺度来描述节理粗糙度的分形特征,并使用边界测量尺度来识别一阶和二阶粗糙度。提出了一个综合指标(\(\eta\)),包括分形粗糙度系数(\(R_{D}\))、描述粗糙度阶次的系数(\(\mu\))和各向异性参数(\(\lambda\)),用于量化表面形貌,该指标考虑了渐开线分布和粗糙度各向异性。建立了 \(\eta\) 和 JRC 之间的关系,并进一步更新了 JRC-JCS 准则。此外,还给出了一些有代表性的例子,以说明用新的定量参数量化粗糙接合面形态所需的步骤。进行了直接剪切试验,以验证所提方法在描述接合粗糙度和估计接合剪切强度方面的有效性;结果表明,使用()来估计接合粗糙度是合适的,所提剪切强度准则可以在可接受的误差范围内适当地预测剪切强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quantifying the morphology of rock joints and updating the JRC–JCS criterion considering the asperity distribution

Quantifying the morphology of rock joints and updating the JRC–JCS criterion considering the asperity distribution

Roughness ubiquitously prevails in rock joints and controls the shear behaviours, permeability and damage characteristics of rock joints. A plethora of investigations have focused on the description of joint roughness; however, a detailed method for quantifying joint roughness and evaluating the shear strength has not yet been established. In this study, within the framework of fractal theory, an optical measurement scale was defined to depict the fractal characteristics of joint roughness, and a boundary measurement scale was used to identify first- and second-order asperities. A composite indicator \(\eta\), including the fractal roughness coefficient (\(R_{D}\)), the coefficient describing the roughness order (\(\mu\)) and the anisotropy parameter (\(\lambda\)), was proposed to quantify the surface morphology, which takes the asperity distribution and roughness anisotropy into account. The relationship between \(\eta\) and JRC was established, and the JRC–JCS criterion was further updated. Moreover, representative examples were given to show the steps required to quantify the morphology of rough joint surfaces with the new quantitative parameter. Direct shear tests were conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in describing joint roughness and estimating joint shear strength; the results indicate that it is appropriate to use \(\eta\) to estimate the joint roughness and that the proposed shear strength criterion can appropriately predict the shear strength within an acceptable error.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.00%
发文量
163
期刊介绍: This journal offers original research, new developments, and case studies in geomechanics and geophysics, focused on energy and resources in Earth’s subsurface. Covers theory, experimental results, numerical methods, modeling, engineering, technology and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信