{"title":"使用基于 ABN 的混合方法探索与驾驶员对高级驾驶员辅助系统的心理模型和信任有关的因素","authors":"Chunxi Huang;Jiyao Wang;Song Yan;Dengbo He","doi":"10.1109/THMS.2024.3436876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drivers’ appropriate mental models of and trust in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are essential to driving safety in vehicles with ADAS. Although several previous studies evaluated drivers’ ADAS mental models of and trust in adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist systems, research gaps still exist. Specifically, recent developments in ADAS have made more advanced functions available but they have been under-investigated. Furthermore, the widely adopted proportional correctness-based scores may not differentiate drivers’ objective ADAS mental model and subjective bias toward the ADAS. Finally, most previous studies adopted only regression models to explore the influential factors and thus may have ignored the underlying association among the factors. Therefore, our study aimed to explore drivers’ mental models of and trust in emerging ADAS by using the sensitivity (i.e., \n<italic>d’</i>\n) and response bias (i.e., \n<italic>c</i>\n) measures from the signal detection theory. We modeled the data from 287 drivers using additive Bayesian network (ABN) and further interpreted the graph model using regression analysis. We found that different factors might be associated with drivers’ objective knowledge of ADAS and subjective bias toward the existence of functions/limitations. Furthermore, drivers’ subjective bias was more associated with their trust in ADAS compared to objective knowledge. The findings from our study provide new insights into the influential factors on drivers’ mental models of ADAS and better reveal how mental models can affect trust in ADAS. It also provides a case study on how the mixed approach with ABN and regression analysis can model observational data.","PeriodicalId":48916,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems","volume":"54 6","pages":"646-657"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Factors Related to Drivers’ Mental Model of and Trust in Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Using an ABN-Based Mixed Approach\",\"authors\":\"Chunxi Huang;Jiyao Wang;Song Yan;Dengbo He\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/THMS.2024.3436876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drivers’ appropriate mental models of and trust in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are essential to driving safety in vehicles with ADAS. Although several previous studies evaluated drivers’ ADAS mental models of and trust in adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist systems, research gaps still exist. Specifically, recent developments in ADAS have made more advanced functions available but they have been under-investigated. Furthermore, the widely adopted proportional correctness-based scores may not differentiate drivers’ objective ADAS mental model and subjective bias toward the ADAS. Finally, most previous studies adopted only regression models to explore the influential factors and thus may have ignored the underlying association among the factors. Therefore, our study aimed to explore drivers’ mental models of and trust in emerging ADAS by using the sensitivity (i.e., \\n<italic>d’</i>\\n) and response bias (i.e., \\n<italic>c</i>\\n) measures from the signal detection theory. We modeled the data from 287 drivers using additive Bayesian network (ABN) and further interpreted the graph model using regression analysis. We found that different factors might be associated with drivers’ objective knowledge of ADAS and subjective bias toward the existence of functions/limitations. Furthermore, drivers’ subjective bias was more associated with their trust in ADAS compared to objective knowledge. The findings from our study provide new insights into the influential factors on drivers’ mental models of ADAS and better reveal how mental models can affect trust in ADAS. It also provides a case study on how the mixed approach with ABN and regression analysis can model observational data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems\",\"volume\":\"54 6\",\"pages\":\"646-657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10679572/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10679572/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring Factors Related to Drivers’ Mental Model of and Trust in Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Using an ABN-Based Mixed Approach
Drivers’ appropriate mental models of and trust in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are essential to driving safety in vehicles with ADAS. Although several previous studies evaluated drivers’ ADAS mental models of and trust in adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist systems, research gaps still exist. Specifically, recent developments in ADAS have made more advanced functions available but they have been under-investigated. Furthermore, the widely adopted proportional correctness-based scores may not differentiate drivers’ objective ADAS mental model and subjective bias toward the ADAS. Finally, most previous studies adopted only regression models to explore the influential factors and thus may have ignored the underlying association among the factors. Therefore, our study aimed to explore drivers’ mental models of and trust in emerging ADAS by using the sensitivity (i.e.,
d’
) and response bias (i.e.,
c
) measures from the signal detection theory. We modeled the data from 287 drivers using additive Bayesian network (ABN) and further interpreted the graph model using regression analysis. We found that different factors might be associated with drivers’ objective knowledge of ADAS and subjective bias toward the existence of functions/limitations. Furthermore, drivers’ subjective bias was more associated with their trust in ADAS compared to objective knowledge. The findings from our study provide new insights into the influential factors on drivers’ mental models of ADAS and better reveal how mental models can affect trust in ADAS. It also provides a case study on how the mixed approach with ABN and regression analysis can model observational data.
期刊介绍:
The scope of the IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems includes the fields of human machine systems. It covers human systems and human organizational interactions including cognitive ergonomics, system test and evaluation, and human information processing concerns in systems and organizations.