使用基于 ABN 的混合方法探索与驾驶员对高级驾驶员辅助系统的心理模型和信任有关的因素

IF 3.5 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Chunxi Huang;Jiyao Wang;Song Yan;Dengbo He
{"title":"使用基于 ABN 的混合方法探索与驾驶员对高级驾驶员辅助系统的心理模型和信任有关的因素","authors":"Chunxi Huang;Jiyao Wang;Song Yan;Dengbo He","doi":"10.1109/THMS.2024.3436876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drivers’ appropriate mental models of and trust in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are essential to driving safety in vehicles with ADAS. Although several previous studies evaluated drivers’ ADAS mental models of and trust in adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist systems, research gaps still exist. Specifically, recent developments in ADAS have made more advanced functions available but they have been under-investigated. Furthermore, the widely adopted proportional correctness-based scores may not differentiate drivers’ objective ADAS mental model and subjective bias toward the ADAS. Finally, most previous studies adopted only regression models to explore the influential factors and thus may have ignored the underlying association among the factors. Therefore, our study aimed to explore drivers’ mental models of and trust in emerging ADAS by using the sensitivity (i.e., \n<italic>d’</i>\n) and response bias (i.e., \n<italic>c</i>\n) measures from the signal detection theory. We modeled the data from 287 drivers using additive Bayesian network (ABN) and further interpreted the graph model using regression analysis. We found that different factors might be associated with drivers’ objective knowledge of ADAS and subjective bias toward the existence of functions/limitations. Furthermore, drivers’ subjective bias was more associated with their trust in ADAS compared to objective knowledge. The findings from our study provide new insights into the influential factors on drivers’ mental models of ADAS and better reveal how mental models can affect trust in ADAS. It also provides a case study on how the mixed approach with ABN and regression analysis can model observational data.","PeriodicalId":48916,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems","volume":"54 6","pages":"646-657"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Factors Related to Drivers’ Mental Model of and Trust in Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Using an ABN-Based Mixed Approach\",\"authors\":\"Chunxi Huang;Jiyao Wang;Song Yan;Dengbo He\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/THMS.2024.3436876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drivers’ appropriate mental models of and trust in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are essential to driving safety in vehicles with ADAS. Although several previous studies evaluated drivers’ ADAS mental models of and trust in adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist systems, research gaps still exist. Specifically, recent developments in ADAS have made more advanced functions available but they have been under-investigated. Furthermore, the widely adopted proportional correctness-based scores may not differentiate drivers’ objective ADAS mental model and subjective bias toward the ADAS. Finally, most previous studies adopted only regression models to explore the influential factors and thus may have ignored the underlying association among the factors. Therefore, our study aimed to explore drivers’ mental models of and trust in emerging ADAS by using the sensitivity (i.e., \\n<italic>d’</i>\\n) and response bias (i.e., \\n<italic>c</i>\\n) measures from the signal detection theory. We modeled the data from 287 drivers using additive Bayesian network (ABN) and further interpreted the graph model using regression analysis. We found that different factors might be associated with drivers’ objective knowledge of ADAS and subjective bias toward the existence of functions/limitations. Furthermore, drivers’ subjective bias was more associated with their trust in ADAS compared to objective knowledge. The findings from our study provide new insights into the influential factors on drivers’ mental models of ADAS and better reveal how mental models can affect trust in ADAS. It also provides a case study on how the mixed approach with ABN and regression analysis can model observational data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems\",\"volume\":\"54 6\",\"pages\":\"646-657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10679572/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10679572/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

驾驶员对高级驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)的适当心理模型和信任对配备 ADAS 的车辆的驾驶安全至关重要。虽然之前有几项研究评估了驾驶员对自适应巡航控制和车道保持辅助系统的 ADAS 心理模型和信任度,但仍存在研究空白。具体而言,ADAS 的最新发展使其具备了更多先进功能,但对这些功能的研究却不足。此外,广泛采用的基于正确性比例的评分可能无法区分驾驶员对 ADAS 的客观心理模型和主观偏见。最后,以往的研究大多仅采用回归模型来探讨影响因素,因此可能忽略了各因素之间的潜在关联。因此,我们的研究旨在利用信号检测理论中的灵敏度(即 d')和反应偏差(即 c)测量指标来探讨驾驶员对新兴 ADAS 的心理模型和信任度。我们使用加法贝叶斯网络(ABN)对来自 287 名驾驶员的数据进行建模,并使用回归分析对图模型进行进一步解释。我们发现,驾驶员对 ADAS 的客观认识和对其功能/限制存在的主观偏见可能与不同因素有关。此外,与客观知识相比,驾驶员的主观偏见与他们对ADAS的信任度更相关。我们的研究结果为了解影响驾驶员对ADAS心智模式的因素提供了新的视角,并更好地揭示了心智模式如何影响驾驶员对ADAS的信任。研究还提供了一个案例,说明 ABN 和回归分析的混合方法如何为观察数据建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Factors Related to Drivers’ Mental Model of and Trust in Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Using an ABN-Based Mixed Approach
Drivers’ appropriate mental models of and trust in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are essential to driving safety in vehicles with ADAS. Although several previous studies evaluated drivers’ ADAS mental models of and trust in adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist systems, research gaps still exist. Specifically, recent developments in ADAS have made more advanced functions available but they have been under-investigated. Furthermore, the widely adopted proportional correctness-based scores may not differentiate drivers’ objective ADAS mental model and subjective bias toward the ADAS. Finally, most previous studies adopted only regression models to explore the influential factors and thus may have ignored the underlying association among the factors. Therefore, our study aimed to explore drivers’ mental models of and trust in emerging ADAS by using the sensitivity (i.e., d’ ) and response bias (i.e., c ) measures from the signal detection theory. We modeled the data from 287 drivers using additive Bayesian network (ABN) and further interpreted the graph model using regression analysis. We found that different factors might be associated with drivers’ objective knowledge of ADAS and subjective bias toward the existence of functions/limitations. Furthermore, drivers’ subjective bias was more associated with their trust in ADAS compared to objective knowledge. The findings from our study provide new insights into the influential factors on drivers’ mental models of ADAS and better reveal how mental models can affect trust in ADAS. It also provides a case study on how the mixed approach with ABN and regression analysis can model observational data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
期刊介绍: The scope of the IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems includes the fields of human machine systems. It covers human systems and human organizational interactions including cognitive ergonomics, system test and evaluation, and human information processing concerns in systems and organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信