{"title":"可持续发展领导力如何改进气候变化报告?与可持续发展董事会相关的选择--管理视角","authors":"Mohamed Toukabri, Lamia Kalai","doi":"10.1007/s11027-024-10153-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, companies’ disclosure of information regarding their carbon emissions has evolved rapidly. However, an important question remains whether carbon emissions disclosure has any influence on climate change risk reporting. Previous literature has not focused on the more pressing question of how changes in carbon performance may lead to subsequent changes in climate change disclosure. This study examines how sustainable board and the use of sustainability targets in executive compensation can moderate the relationship between climate change disclosure and carbon performance. Following a mixed theoretical framework focusing on upper echelon theory, we revisit the relationship between climate change reporting and carbon performance. The Leadership Index is used to measure the level of climate change disclosure, and carbon performance is based on both the carbon intensity of emissions and the mitigation of carbon emissions. From an international sample of listed companies, we use an ordered logit regression methodology. Our study contributes to the growing literature on sustainable governance and the effect of Chief Sustainability Officer serving on the board of directors on climate change reporting. The most important idea is to know which sustainable board mechanisms should be responsible for improving climate reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":54387,"journal":{"name":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does sustainability leadership improve climate change reporting? The choices associated with a sustainable board- A management perspective\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Toukabri, Lamia Kalai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11027-024-10153-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In recent years, companies’ disclosure of information regarding their carbon emissions has evolved rapidly. However, an important question remains whether carbon emissions disclosure has any influence on climate change risk reporting. Previous literature has not focused on the more pressing question of how changes in carbon performance may lead to subsequent changes in climate change disclosure. This study examines how sustainable board and the use of sustainability targets in executive compensation can moderate the relationship between climate change disclosure and carbon performance. Following a mixed theoretical framework focusing on upper echelon theory, we revisit the relationship between climate change reporting and carbon performance. The Leadership Index is used to measure the level of climate change disclosure, and carbon performance is based on both the carbon intensity of emissions and the mitigation of carbon emissions. From an international sample of listed companies, we use an ordered logit regression methodology. Our study contributes to the growing literature on sustainable governance and the effect of Chief Sustainability Officer serving on the board of directors on climate change reporting. The most important idea is to know which sustainable board mechanisms should be responsible for improving climate reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10153-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10153-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
How does sustainability leadership improve climate change reporting? The choices associated with a sustainable board- A management perspective
In recent years, companies’ disclosure of information regarding their carbon emissions has evolved rapidly. However, an important question remains whether carbon emissions disclosure has any influence on climate change risk reporting. Previous literature has not focused on the more pressing question of how changes in carbon performance may lead to subsequent changes in climate change disclosure. This study examines how sustainable board and the use of sustainability targets in executive compensation can moderate the relationship between climate change disclosure and carbon performance. Following a mixed theoretical framework focusing on upper echelon theory, we revisit the relationship between climate change reporting and carbon performance. The Leadership Index is used to measure the level of climate change disclosure, and carbon performance is based on both the carbon intensity of emissions and the mitigation of carbon emissions. From an international sample of listed companies, we use an ordered logit regression methodology. Our study contributes to the growing literature on sustainable governance and the effect of Chief Sustainability Officer serving on the board of directors on climate change reporting. The most important idea is to know which sustainable board mechanisms should be responsible for improving climate reporting.
期刊介绍:
The Earth''s biosphere is being transformed by various anthropogenic activities. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change addresses a wide range of environment, economic and energy topics and timely issues including global climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, acid deposition, eutrophication of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, species extinction and loss of biological diversity, deforestation and forest degradation, desertification, soil resource degradation, land-use change, sea level rise, destruction of coastal zones, depletion of fresh water and marine fisheries, loss of wetlands and riparian zones and hazardous waste management.
Response options to mitigate these threats or to adapt to changing environs are needed to ensure a sustainable biosphere for all forms of life. To that end, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change provides a forum to encourage the conceptualization, critical examination and debate regarding response options. The aim of this journal is to provide a forum to review, analyze and stimulate the development, testing and implementation of mitigation and adaptation strategies at regional, national and global scales. One of the primary goals of this journal is to contribute to real-time policy analysis and development as national and international policies and agreements are discussed and promulgated.