在爆发性自主等长收缩过程中,TMS 运动诱发反应和静默期的测试-再测试可靠性。

Federico Castelli, Omar Sahid Mian, Adam Bruton, Ashika C Chembila Valappil, Neale Anthony Tillin
{"title":"在爆发性自主等长收缩过程中,TMS 运动诱发反应和静默期的测试-再测试可靠性。","authors":"Federico Castelli, Omar Sahid Mian, Adam Bruton, Ashika C Chembila Valappil, Neale Anthony Tillin","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.12.607577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study assessed the test-retest reliability of TMS motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and silent periods at early, middle, and late phases of the rising time-torque curve during explosive voluntary contractions. We also investigated how the number of consecutively averaged measurements influenced reliability. Methods: On two separate occasions 3-7 days apart, 14 adults completed 48 isometric explosives (1-s) contractions of the knee extensors, superimposed with TMS. The TMS elicited an MEP and silent period in the superficial quadriceps muscles at 45 (early), 115 (middle), or 190 ms (late) during each contraction. TMS was also superimposed at the plateau of 15 separate MVCs. Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated for MEPs and silent periods consecutively averaged over 3 to 15 separate contractions. Results: No one condition/phase was more reliable than another. For MEP amplitude, in all conditions except the explosive late phase, ICCs generally increased, and CV decreased, with an increase in the number of averaged contractions, and were >0.50 ICC and <15% CV within 7 contractions. For silent period, ICCs and CVs were unaffected by the number of consecutively averaged contractions and remained >0.50 ICC and <10% CV. Conclusion: Test-retest reliability of TMS responses is comparable between phases of explosive contraction and at the plateau of MVC. To maximise reliability of MEPs during explosive contractions or MVCs, we recommend future studies average data across more than the 3-5 contractions typically reported in the literature investigating MEPs at MVC plateau.","PeriodicalId":501557,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Physiology","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test-retest reliability of TMS motor evoked responses and silent periods during explosive voluntary isometric contractions.\",\"authors\":\"Federico Castelli, Omar Sahid Mian, Adam Bruton, Ashika C Chembila Valappil, Neale Anthony Tillin\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.12.607577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study assessed the test-retest reliability of TMS motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and silent periods at early, middle, and late phases of the rising time-torque curve during explosive voluntary contractions. We also investigated how the number of consecutively averaged measurements influenced reliability. Methods: On two separate occasions 3-7 days apart, 14 adults completed 48 isometric explosives (1-s) contractions of the knee extensors, superimposed with TMS. The TMS elicited an MEP and silent period in the superficial quadriceps muscles at 45 (early), 115 (middle), or 190 ms (late) during each contraction. TMS was also superimposed at the plateau of 15 separate MVCs. Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated for MEPs and silent periods consecutively averaged over 3 to 15 separate contractions. Results: No one condition/phase was more reliable than another. For MEP amplitude, in all conditions except the explosive late phase, ICCs generally increased, and CV decreased, with an increase in the number of averaged contractions, and were >0.50 ICC and <15% CV within 7 contractions. For silent period, ICCs and CVs were unaffected by the number of consecutively averaged contractions and remained >0.50 ICC and <10% CV. Conclusion: Test-retest reliability of TMS responses is comparable between phases of explosive contraction and at the plateau of MVC. To maximise reliability of MEPs during explosive contractions or MVCs, we recommend future studies average data across more than the 3-5 contractions typically reported in the literature investigating MEPs at MVC plateau.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Physiology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.12.607577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.12.607577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了在爆发性自主收缩过程中,TMS 运动诱发电位(MEPs)和时间-力矩曲线上升早期、中期和晚期无声期的测试-再测试可靠性。我们还研究了连续平均测量次数对可靠性的影响。测量方法在相隔 3-7 天的两个不同场合,14 名成人完成了 48 次膝关节伸肌的等长爆发性收缩(1 秒),并与 TMS 叠加。在每次收缩过程中,TMS 会在股四头肌浅层肌肉的 45 毫秒(早期)、115 毫秒(中期)或 190 毫秒(晚期)处触发 MEP 和静默期。TMS 还叠加在 15 个独立 MVC 的高原上。在 3 至 15 次独立收缩中连续计算 MEPs 和静默期的平均值,并计算测试-重复类内相关系数 (ICC) 和变异系数 (CV)。结果:没有一种条件/阶段比另一种条件/阶段更可靠。就 MEP 振幅而言,除爆发性晚期阶段外,在所有条件下,随着平均收缩次数的增加,ICC 通常会增加,而 CV 则会降低,在 7 次收缩内,ICC 为 0.50,CV 为 15%。在静默期,ICC 和 CV 不受连续平均收缩次数的影响,仍为 >0.50 ICC 和 <10% CV。结论在爆发性收缩阶段和 MVC 高原阶段,TMS 反应的测试-再测可靠性相当。为了最大限度地提高爆发性收缩或 MVC 期间 MEPs 的可靠性,我们建议未来的研究在调查 MVC 高原 MEPs 的文献中通常会报告超过 3-5 次收缩的平均数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Test-retest reliability of TMS motor evoked responses and silent periods during explosive voluntary isometric contractions.
Purpose: This study assessed the test-retest reliability of TMS motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and silent periods at early, middle, and late phases of the rising time-torque curve during explosive voluntary contractions. We also investigated how the number of consecutively averaged measurements influenced reliability. Methods: On two separate occasions 3-7 days apart, 14 adults completed 48 isometric explosives (1-s) contractions of the knee extensors, superimposed with TMS. The TMS elicited an MEP and silent period in the superficial quadriceps muscles at 45 (early), 115 (middle), or 190 ms (late) during each contraction. TMS was also superimposed at the plateau of 15 separate MVCs. Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated for MEPs and silent periods consecutively averaged over 3 to 15 separate contractions. Results: No one condition/phase was more reliable than another. For MEP amplitude, in all conditions except the explosive late phase, ICCs generally increased, and CV decreased, with an increase in the number of averaged contractions, and were >0.50 ICC and <15% CV within 7 contractions. For silent period, ICCs and CVs were unaffected by the number of consecutively averaged contractions and remained >0.50 ICC and <10% CV. Conclusion: Test-retest reliability of TMS responses is comparable between phases of explosive contraction and at the plateau of MVC. To maximise reliability of MEPs during explosive contractions or MVCs, we recommend future studies average data across more than the 3-5 contractions typically reported in the literature investigating MEPs at MVC plateau.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信