{"title":"展示广告的成本控制:理论与实践","authors":"Anoop R Katti, Rui C. Gonçalves, Rinchin Iakovlev","doi":"arxiv-2409.03874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In display advertising, advertisers want to achieve a marketing objective\nwith constraints on budget and cost-per-outcome. This is usually formulated as\nan optimization problem that maximizes the total utility under constraints. The\noptimization is carried out in an online fashion in the dual space - for an\nincoming Ad auction, a bid is placed using an optimal bidding formula, assuming\noptimal values for the dual variables; based on the outcome of the previous\nauctions, the dual variables are updated in an online fashion. While this\napproach is theoretically sound, in practice, the dual variables are not\noptimal from the beginning, but rather converge over time. Specifically, for\nthe cost-constraint, the convergence is asymptotic. As a result, we find that\ncost-control is ineffective. In this work, we analyse the shortcomings of the\noptimal bidding formula and propose a modification that deviates from the\ntheoretical derivation. We simulate various practical scenarios and study the\ncost-control behaviors of the two algorithms. Through a large-scale evaluation\non the real-word data, we show that the proposed modification reduces the cost\nviolations by 50%, thereby achieving a better cost-control than the theoretical\nbidding formula.","PeriodicalId":501316,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Control in Display Advertising: Theory vs Practice\",\"authors\":\"Anoop R Katti, Rui C. Gonçalves, Rinchin Iakovlev\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.03874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In display advertising, advertisers want to achieve a marketing objective\\nwith constraints on budget and cost-per-outcome. This is usually formulated as\\nan optimization problem that maximizes the total utility under constraints. The\\noptimization is carried out in an online fashion in the dual space - for an\\nincoming Ad auction, a bid is placed using an optimal bidding formula, assuming\\noptimal values for the dual variables; based on the outcome of the previous\\nauctions, the dual variables are updated in an online fashion. While this\\napproach is theoretically sound, in practice, the dual variables are not\\noptimal from the beginning, but rather converge over time. Specifically, for\\nthe cost-constraint, the convergence is asymptotic. As a result, we find that\\ncost-control is ineffective. In this work, we analyse the shortcomings of the\\noptimal bidding formula and propose a modification that deviates from the\\ntheoretical derivation. We simulate various practical scenarios and study the\\ncost-control behaviors of the two algorithms. Through a large-scale evaluation\\non the real-word data, we show that the proposed modification reduces the cost\\nviolations by 50%, thereby achieving a better cost-control than the theoretical\\nbidding formula.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.03874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.03874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cost-Control in Display Advertising: Theory vs Practice
In display advertising, advertisers want to achieve a marketing objective
with constraints on budget and cost-per-outcome. This is usually formulated as
an optimization problem that maximizes the total utility under constraints. The
optimization is carried out in an online fashion in the dual space - for an
incoming Ad auction, a bid is placed using an optimal bidding formula, assuming
optimal values for the dual variables; based on the outcome of the previous
auctions, the dual variables are updated in an online fashion. While this
approach is theoretically sound, in practice, the dual variables are not
optimal from the beginning, but rather converge over time. Specifically, for
the cost-constraint, the convergence is asymptotic. As a result, we find that
cost-control is ineffective. In this work, we analyse the shortcomings of the
optimal bidding formula and propose a modification that deviates from the
theoretical derivation. We simulate various practical scenarios and study the
cost-control behaviors of the two algorithms. Through a large-scale evaluation
on the real-word data, we show that the proposed modification reduces the cost
violations by 50%, thereby achieving a better cost-control than the theoretical
bidding formula.