{"title":"绿色技术开放、模仿与投资:竞争市场中企业的战略技术选择","authors":"Shaofu Du, Chenyang Gou, Wenzhi Tang","doi":"10.1007/s10479-024-06201-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Green firms are considering whether to open or close their new green technologies. Opening up green technology can induce imitation and transformation in traditional firms but intensify competition in the green product market. Meanwhile, green technology imitation leads to the market share transfer effect, which is a supply-side network externality that gains consumer trust and increases the market share of green products as more firms adopt the technology. However, traditional firms also face a dilemma in green technology imitation choices due to the market cannibalization problem. This study constructs a game-theoretic model with one green firm possessing proprietary green technology and one traditional firm to investigate firms’ strategic interactions among green technology opening, imitation, and investment. We find that the technology opening strategy may constitute equilibrium if the market transfer share or the market size of green products is relatively large. Accordingly, the traditional firm produces green products by imitation when the green firm opens its technology. In addition, the technology opening strategy improves social welfare compared with the technology closing strategy, thus forming a win-win situation. We further extend the analysis by considering the technology licensing contract model, consumer-side network effects, the sequential quantity game model, market demand uncertainty, and the government’s subsidy policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8215,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Operations Research","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green technology opening, imitation, and investment: firms’ strategic technology choices in competitive markets\",\"authors\":\"Shaofu Du, Chenyang Gou, Wenzhi Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10479-024-06201-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Green firms are considering whether to open or close their new green technologies. Opening up green technology can induce imitation and transformation in traditional firms but intensify competition in the green product market. Meanwhile, green technology imitation leads to the market share transfer effect, which is a supply-side network externality that gains consumer trust and increases the market share of green products as more firms adopt the technology. However, traditional firms also face a dilemma in green technology imitation choices due to the market cannibalization problem. This study constructs a game-theoretic model with one green firm possessing proprietary green technology and one traditional firm to investigate firms’ strategic interactions among green technology opening, imitation, and investment. We find that the technology opening strategy may constitute equilibrium if the market transfer share or the market size of green products is relatively large. Accordingly, the traditional firm produces green products by imitation when the green firm opens its technology. In addition, the technology opening strategy improves social welfare compared with the technology closing strategy, thus forming a win-win situation. We further extend the analysis by considering the technology licensing contract model, consumer-side network effects, the sequential quantity game model, market demand uncertainty, and the government’s subsidy policy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Operations Research\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Operations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06201-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06201-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Green technology opening, imitation, and investment: firms’ strategic technology choices in competitive markets
Green firms are considering whether to open or close their new green technologies. Opening up green technology can induce imitation and transformation in traditional firms but intensify competition in the green product market. Meanwhile, green technology imitation leads to the market share transfer effect, which is a supply-side network externality that gains consumer trust and increases the market share of green products as more firms adopt the technology. However, traditional firms also face a dilemma in green technology imitation choices due to the market cannibalization problem. This study constructs a game-theoretic model with one green firm possessing proprietary green technology and one traditional firm to investigate firms’ strategic interactions among green technology opening, imitation, and investment. We find that the technology opening strategy may constitute equilibrium if the market transfer share or the market size of green products is relatively large. Accordingly, the traditional firm produces green products by imitation when the green firm opens its technology. In addition, the technology opening strategy improves social welfare compared with the technology closing strategy, thus forming a win-win situation. We further extend the analysis by considering the technology licensing contract model, consumer-side network effects, the sequential quantity game model, market demand uncertainty, and the government’s subsidy policy.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Operations Research publishes peer-reviewed original articles dealing with key aspects of operations research, including theory, practice, and computation. The journal publishes full-length research articles, short notes, expositions and surveys, reports on computational studies, and case studies that present new and innovative practical applications.
In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes periodic special volumes that focus on defined fields of operations research, ranging from the highly theoretical to the algorithmic and the applied. These volumes have one or more Guest Editors who are responsible for collecting the papers and overseeing the refereeing process.