移动工具箱(MTB)拼写测试的开发与验证

IF 4.3 Q2 BUSINESS
E. LaForte, Stephanie Ruth Young, E. M. Dworak, M. A. Novack, A. J. Kaat, H. Adam, C. J. Nowinski, Z. Hosseinian, J. Slotkin, S. Amagai, M. V. Diaz, A. A. Correa, K. Alperin, M. Camacho, B. Landavazo, R. Nosheny, M. W. Weiner, R. M. Gershon
{"title":"移动工具箱(MTB)拼写测试的开发与验证","authors":"E. LaForte, Stephanie Ruth Young, E. M. Dworak, M. A. Novack, A. J. Kaat, H. Adam, C. J. Nowinski, Z. Hosseinian, J. Slotkin, S. Amagai, M. V. Diaz, A. A. Correa, K. Alperin, M. Camacho, B. Landavazo, R. Nosheny, M. W. Weiner, R. M. Gershon","doi":"10.14283/jpad.2024.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Spelling assessments can provide a valuable marker of cognitive change in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) and play an important role in ADRD research. However, most commercial assessments are not well-suited to the needs of researchers or participants; they are expensive and often require face-to-face administration by a trained examiner. To help overcome these barriers and foster progress in ADRD research, the National Institute on Aging (NIA)-funded Mobile Toolbox (MTB) offers a library of cognitive measures that can be self-administered remotely on a participant’s own smartphone, including a brand-new Spelling test.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>The goal of this paper is to describe the design, piloting, calibration, and validation of the MTB Spelling test.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Design</h3><p>We describe a pilot study, calibration study, and three validation studies, all of which use a cross-sectional design.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Setting</h3><p>The pilot study, calibration study, and validation studies 2 and 3 were conducted remotely, while validation study 1 was conducted in the lab.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Participants</h3><p>Participants for all of the studies were recruited from the general population by a thirdparty market research firm and the samples were stratified by age, gender, race, ethnicity, and education to represent the U.S. population. The pilot sample included 1,950 participants and the calibration study included 1335 participants over the age of 8. Validation study 1 included 92 participants ages 20 to 84, validation study 2 included 1021 participants ages 18 to 90, and validation study 3 included 168 participants ages 28 to 87.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Measurements</h3><p>Participants in each of the studies completed the MTB Spelling test. Participants in validation studies 1 and 2 completed measures from the NIH Toolbox including Oral Reading Recognition as a measure of convergent validity, and Visual Reasoning and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning as measures of divergent validity. As an additional measure of convergent validity, participants in study 1 also completed the Spelling subtest from the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, 4th Edition.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The MTB Spelling test demonstrated evidence of internal consistency (r=.79 to.83) convergent validity (r=.56 to.81, p&lt;.01), discriminant validity (r =.23 to.36, p &lt;.01), test-retest reliability (ICC=.63), and correlations with normal cognitive aging (r = −.06 to −.04, p &gt;.01).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Findings suggest the MTB Spelling test is a reliable and valid measure of English spelling abilities in general population samples, and has potential in ADRD research.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation the Mobile Toolbox (MTB) Spelling Test\",\"authors\":\"E. LaForte, Stephanie Ruth Young, E. M. Dworak, M. A. Novack, A. J. Kaat, H. Adam, C. J. Nowinski, Z. Hosseinian, J. Slotkin, S. Amagai, M. V. Diaz, A. A. Correa, K. Alperin, M. Camacho, B. Landavazo, R. Nosheny, M. W. Weiner, R. M. Gershon\",\"doi\":\"10.14283/jpad.2024.158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Spelling assessments can provide a valuable marker of cognitive change in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) and play an important role in ADRD research. However, most commercial assessments are not well-suited to the needs of researchers or participants; they are expensive and often require face-to-face administration by a trained examiner. To help overcome these barriers and foster progress in ADRD research, the National Institute on Aging (NIA)-funded Mobile Toolbox (MTB) offers a library of cognitive measures that can be self-administered remotely on a participant’s own smartphone, including a brand-new Spelling test.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objective</h3><p>The goal of this paper is to describe the design, piloting, calibration, and validation of the MTB Spelling test.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Design</h3><p>We describe a pilot study, calibration study, and three validation studies, all of which use a cross-sectional design.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Setting</h3><p>The pilot study, calibration study, and validation studies 2 and 3 were conducted remotely, while validation study 1 was conducted in the lab.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Participants</h3><p>Participants for all of the studies were recruited from the general population by a thirdparty market research firm and the samples were stratified by age, gender, race, ethnicity, and education to represent the U.S. population. The pilot sample included 1,950 participants and the calibration study included 1335 participants over the age of 8. Validation study 1 included 92 participants ages 20 to 84, validation study 2 included 1021 participants ages 18 to 90, and validation study 3 included 168 participants ages 28 to 87.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Measurements</h3><p>Participants in each of the studies completed the MTB Spelling test. Participants in validation studies 1 and 2 completed measures from the NIH Toolbox including Oral Reading Recognition as a measure of convergent validity, and Visual Reasoning and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning as measures of divergent validity. As an additional measure of convergent validity, participants in study 1 also completed the Spelling subtest from the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, 4th Edition.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The MTB Spelling test demonstrated evidence of internal consistency (r=.79 to.83) convergent validity (r=.56 to.81, p&lt;.01), discriminant validity (r =.23 to.36, p &lt;.01), test-retest reliability (ICC=.63), and correlations with normal cognitive aging (r = −.06 to −.04, p &gt;.01).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Findings suggest the MTB Spelling test is a reliable and valid measure of English spelling abilities in general population samples, and has potential in ADRD research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2024.158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2024.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景拼写评估可以作为阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症(ADRD)认知变化的重要标志,在 ADRD 研究中发挥着重要作用。然而,大多数商业评估并不能很好地满足研究人员或参与者的需求;它们价格昂贵,而且通常需要训练有素的考官进行面对面的管理。为了帮助克服这些障碍并促进 ADRD 研究的进展,由美国国家老龄化研究所(NIA)资助的移动工具箱(MTB)提供了一个认知测量库,可以在参与者自己的智能手机上进行远程自我管理,其中包括一个全新的拼写测试。设计我们介绍了一项试点研究、校准研究和三项验证研究,所有研究均采用横断面设计。环境试点研究、校准研究、验证研究 2 和 3 是远程进行的,而验证研究 1 是在实验室进行的。参与者所有研究的参与者都是由第三方市场调研公司从普通人群中招募的,样本按年龄、性别、种族、民族和教育程度进行了分层,以代表美国人口。试验样本包括 1,950 名参与者,校准研究包括 1335 名 8 岁以上的参与者。 验证研究 1 包括 92 名 20 至 84 岁的参与者,验证研究 2 包括 1021 名 18 至 90 岁的参与者,验证研究 3 包括 168 名 28 至 87 岁的参与者。验证研究 1 和 2 的参与者都完成了 NIH 工具箱中的测量项目,其中包括作为聚合效度测量项目的口语阅读识别,以及作为发散效度测量项目的视觉推理和雷伊听觉言语学习。作为收敛效度的额外测量,研究 1 的参与者还完成了韦氏个人成就测验第四版中的拼写分测验。结果MTB 拼写测验显示了内部一致性(r=.79 至.83)、收敛效度(r=.56 至.81,p<.01)、区分效度(r=.23 至.36、结论研究结果表明,在普通人群样本中,MTB 拼写测试是一种可靠、有效的英语拼写能力测量方法,在 ADRD 研究中具有潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development and Validation the Mobile Toolbox (MTB) Spelling Test

Development and Validation the Mobile Toolbox (MTB) Spelling Test

Background

Spelling assessments can provide a valuable marker of cognitive change in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) and play an important role in ADRD research. However, most commercial assessments are not well-suited to the needs of researchers or participants; they are expensive and often require face-to-face administration by a trained examiner. To help overcome these barriers and foster progress in ADRD research, the National Institute on Aging (NIA)-funded Mobile Toolbox (MTB) offers a library of cognitive measures that can be self-administered remotely on a participant’s own smartphone, including a brand-new Spelling test.

Objective

The goal of this paper is to describe the design, piloting, calibration, and validation of the MTB Spelling test.

Design

We describe a pilot study, calibration study, and three validation studies, all of which use a cross-sectional design.

Setting

The pilot study, calibration study, and validation studies 2 and 3 were conducted remotely, while validation study 1 was conducted in the lab.

Participants

Participants for all of the studies were recruited from the general population by a thirdparty market research firm and the samples were stratified by age, gender, race, ethnicity, and education to represent the U.S. population. The pilot sample included 1,950 participants and the calibration study included 1335 participants over the age of 8. Validation study 1 included 92 participants ages 20 to 84, validation study 2 included 1021 participants ages 18 to 90, and validation study 3 included 168 participants ages 28 to 87.

Measurements

Participants in each of the studies completed the MTB Spelling test. Participants in validation studies 1 and 2 completed measures from the NIH Toolbox including Oral Reading Recognition as a measure of convergent validity, and Visual Reasoning and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning as measures of divergent validity. As an additional measure of convergent validity, participants in study 1 also completed the Spelling subtest from the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, 4th Edition.

Results

The MTB Spelling test demonstrated evidence of internal consistency (r=.79 to.83) convergent validity (r=.56 to.81, p<.01), discriminant validity (r =.23 to.36, p <.01), test-retest reliability (ICC=.63), and correlations with normal cognitive aging (r = −.06 to −.04, p >.01).

Conclusion

Findings suggest the MTB Spelling test is a reliable and valid measure of English spelling abilities in general population samples, and has potential in ADRD research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信