没有Numeraire的组合拍卖:区块链交易意向拍卖案例

Andrea Canidio, Felix Henneke
{"title":"没有Numeraire的组合拍卖:区块链交易意向拍卖案例","authors":"Andrea Canidio, Felix Henneke","doi":"arxiv-2408.12225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blockchain trade intent auctions currently intermediate approximately USD 5\nbillion monthly. Due to production complementarities, the auction is\ncombinatorial: when multiple trade intents from different traders are auctioned\noff simultaneously, a bidder (here called solver) can generate additional\nefficiencies by winning a batch of multiple trade intents. However, unlike\nother combinatorial auctions studied in the literature, the auction has no\nnumeraire. Fairness is a concern as the efficiencies from batching cannot be\neasily shared between traders. We formalize this problem and study the most\ncommonly used auction formats: batch auctions and multiple simultaneous\nauctions. We also propose a novel fair combinatorial auction that combines\nbatch auction and multiple simultaneous auctions: solvers submit\nindividual-trade bids and batched bids, but batched bids are considered only if\nthey are better for all traders relative to the outcome of multiple\nsimultaneous auctions (constructed using the individual-trade bids). We find a\ntrade-off between the fairness guarantees provided by the auction (i.e., the\nminimum each trader can expect to receive) and the expected value of the assets\nreturned to the traders. Also, the amount that each trader receives in the\nequilibrium of the fair combinatorial auction may be higher or lower than what\nthey receive in the equilibrium of the simultaneous auctions used as a\nbenchmark for fairness.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combinatorial Auctions without a Numeraire: The Case of Blockchain Trade-Intent Auctions\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Canidio, Felix Henneke\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.12225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Blockchain trade intent auctions currently intermediate approximately USD 5\\nbillion monthly. Due to production complementarities, the auction is\\ncombinatorial: when multiple trade intents from different traders are auctioned\\noff simultaneously, a bidder (here called solver) can generate additional\\nefficiencies by winning a batch of multiple trade intents. However, unlike\\nother combinatorial auctions studied in the literature, the auction has no\\nnumeraire. Fairness is a concern as the efficiencies from batching cannot be\\neasily shared between traders. We formalize this problem and study the most\\ncommonly used auction formats: batch auctions and multiple simultaneous\\nauctions. We also propose a novel fair combinatorial auction that combines\\nbatch auction and multiple simultaneous auctions: solvers submit\\nindividual-trade bids and batched bids, but batched bids are considered only if\\nthey are better for all traders relative to the outcome of multiple\\nsimultaneous auctions (constructed using the individual-trade bids). We find a\\ntrade-off between the fairness guarantees provided by the auction (i.e., the\\nminimum each trader can expect to receive) and the expected value of the assets\\nreturned to the traders. Also, the amount that each trader receives in the\\nequilibrium of the fair combinatorial auction may be higher or lower than what\\nthey receive in the equilibrium of the simultaneous auctions used as a\\nbenchmark for fairness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.12225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.12225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,区块链贸易意向拍卖每月的中间交易额约为 50 亿美元。由于生产的互补性,拍卖具有组合性:当来自不同交易者的多个贸易意向同时被拍卖时,竞标者(此处称为求解者)可以通过赢得一批多个贸易意向来产生额外的效率。然而,与文献中研究的其他组合拍卖不同的是,这种拍卖没有无底价。由于交易者之间不能轻易分享批量交易带来的效率,因此公平性是一个令人担忧的问题。我们将这一问题形式化,并研究了最常用的拍卖格式:分批拍卖和多重同时拍卖。我们还提出了一种结合了分批拍卖和多重同时拍卖的新型公平组合拍卖:求解者提交单个交易出价和分批出价,但只有当分批出价相对于多重同时拍卖(使用单个交易出价构建)的结果对所有交易者更有利时,分批出价才会被考虑。我们发现拍卖提供的公平性保证(即每个交易者预期可获得的最低金额)与交易者返回资产的预期价值之间存在权衡。此外,每个交易者在公平组合拍卖的均衡中获得的金额可能高于或低于他们在作为公平性基准的同时拍卖的均衡中获得的金额。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combinatorial Auctions without a Numeraire: The Case of Blockchain Trade-Intent Auctions
Blockchain trade intent auctions currently intermediate approximately USD 5 billion monthly. Due to production complementarities, the auction is combinatorial: when multiple trade intents from different traders are auctioned off simultaneously, a bidder (here called solver) can generate additional efficiencies by winning a batch of multiple trade intents. However, unlike other combinatorial auctions studied in the literature, the auction has no numeraire. Fairness is a concern as the efficiencies from batching cannot be easily shared between traders. We formalize this problem and study the most commonly used auction formats: batch auctions and multiple simultaneous auctions. We also propose a novel fair combinatorial auction that combines batch auction and multiple simultaneous auctions: solvers submit individual-trade bids and batched bids, but batched bids are considered only if they are better for all traders relative to the outcome of multiple simultaneous auctions (constructed using the individual-trade bids). We find a trade-off between the fairness guarantees provided by the auction (i.e., the minimum each trader can expect to receive) and the expected value of the assets returned to the traders. Also, the amount that each trader receives in the equilibrium of the fair combinatorial auction may be higher or lower than what they receive in the equilibrium of the simultaneous auctions used as a benchmark for fairness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信