粗略的描述和谨慎的偏好

Evan Piermont, Marcus Pivato
{"title":"粗略的描述和谨慎的偏好","authors":"Evan Piermont, Marcus Pivato","doi":"arxiv-2409.06054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider a model where an agent is must choose between alternatives that\neach provide only an imprecise description of the world (e.g. linguistic\nexpressions). The set of alternatives is closed under logical conjunction and\ndisjunction, but not necessarily negation. (Formally: it is a distributive\nlattice, but not necessarily a Boolean algebra). In our main result, each\nalternative is identified with a subset of an (endogenously defined) state\nspace, and two axioms characterize maximin decision making. This means: from\nthe agent's preferences over alternatives, we derive a preference order on the\nendogenous state space, such that alternatives are ranked in terms of their\nworst outcomes.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coarse Descriptions and Cautious Preferences\",\"authors\":\"Evan Piermont, Marcus Pivato\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.06054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider a model where an agent is must choose between alternatives that\\neach provide only an imprecise description of the world (e.g. linguistic\\nexpressions). The set of alternatives is closed under logical conjunction and\\ndisjunction, but not necessarily negation. (Formally: it is a distributive\\nlattice, but not necessarily a Boolean algebra). In our main result, each\\nalternative is identified with a subset of an (endogenously defined) state\\nspace, and two axioms characterize maximin decision making. This means: from\\nthe agent's preferences over alternatives, we derive a preference order on the\\nendogenous state space, such that alternatives are ranked in terms of their\\nworst outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们考虑这样一个模型,即代理人必须在每一个都只提供了对世界的不精确描述(如语言表达)的备选方案中做出选择。备选方案集在逻辑联结和反联结下是封闭的,但不一定是否定的。(形式上:它是一个分布格,但不一定是布尔代数)。在我们的主要结果中,每个备选方案都与一个(内生定义的)状态空间的一个子集相一致,最大化决策有两个公理。这意味着:根据代理人对备选方案的偏好,我们可以在内生状态空间上推导出一个偏好顺序,这样备选方案就会按照其最坏的结果进行排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coarse Descriptions and Cautious Preferences
We consider a model where an agent is must choose between alternatives that each provide only an imprecise description of the world (e.g. linguistic expressions). The set of alternatives is closed under logical conjunction and disjunction, but not necessarily negation. (Formally: it is a distributive lattice, but not necessarily a Boolean algebra). In our main result, each alternative is identified with a subset of an (endogenously defined) state space, and two axioms characterize maximin decision making. This means: from the agent's preferences over alternatives, we derive a preference order on the endogenous state space, such that alternatives are ranked in terms of their worst outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信