{"title":"粗略的描述和谨慎的偏好","authors":"Evan Piermont, Marcus Pivato","doi":"arxiv-2409.06054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider a model where an agent is must choose between alternatives that\neach provide only an imprecise description of the world (e.g. linguistic\nexpressions). The set of alternatives is closed under logical conjunction and\ndisjunction, but not necessarily negation. (Formally: it is a distributive\nlattice, but not necessarily a Boolean algebra). In our main result, each\nalternative is identified with a subset of an (endogenously defined) state\nspace, and two axioms characterize maximin decision making. This means: from\nthe agent's preferences over alternatives, we derive a preference order on the\nendogenous state space, such that alternatives are ranked in terms of their\nworst outcomes.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coarse Descriptions and Cautious Preferences\",\"authors\":\"Evan Piermont, Marcus Pivato\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.06054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider a model where an agent is must choose between alternatives that\\neach provide only an imprecise description of the world (e.g. linguistic\\nexpressions). The set of alternatives is closed under logical conjunction and\\ndisjunction, but not necessarily negation. (Formally: it is a distributive\\nlattice, but not necessarily a Boolean algebra). In our main result, each\\nalternative is identified with a subset of an (endogenously defined) state\\nspace, and two axioms characterize maximin decision making. This means: from\\nthe agent's preferences over alternatives, we derive a preference order on the\\nendogenous state space, such that alternatives are ranked in terms of their\\nworst outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We consider a model where an agent is must choose between alternatives that
each provide only an imprecise description of the world (e.g. linguistic
expressions). The set of alternatives is closed under logical conjunction and
disjunction, but not necessarily negation. (Formally: it is a distributive
lattice, but not necessarily a Boolean algebra). In our main result, each
alternative is identified with a subset of an (endogenously defined) state
space, and two axioms characterize maximin decision making. This means: from
the agent's preferences over alternatives, we derive a preference order on the
endogenous state space, such that alternatives are ranked in terms of their
worst outcomes.