发展共同语言:拟议的早期实施科学合作讨论框架指南

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Stephanie Best, Sanne Peters, Lisa Guccione, Jillian Francis, Marlena Klaic
{"title":"发展共同语言:拟议的早期实施科学合作讨论框架指南","authors":"Stephanie Best, Sanne Peters, Lisa Guccione, Jillian Francis, Marlena Klaic","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibae044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Miscommunication between health care practitioners and implementation researchers can lead to a mismatch of expectations and understandings, resulting in wasted research and frustration. Conversely, combining the expertise and knowledge of those working in health care practice and implementation research can deliver context informed research questions and appropriate study designs. Achieving this ambition requires a shared language. We sought to develop a guide to identify a common language to constructively explore nascent implementation research concepts. We set up a working group, comprising of implementation researchers, health care practitioners and operational managers, to work through ideas generation, debate and a consensus process to generate and refine a discussion guide. The resultant guide steps health care practitioners and implementation researchers through a three-phase enquiry - Question 1: What is the implementation question? Question 2: What is the proposed implementation solution? And Question 3: How can the investigation of this idea be resourced? At each step, the health care practitioner and implementation researcher collaborate to include theory and practice and rigorously work through the question to build implementation on evidence and to promote diverse stakeholder engagement. The next steps for this study will be operationalising the discussion guide, as an interactive tool. Future evaluation, to test effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility will be designed with health care practitioners and implementation researchers.","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"398 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a shared language: a proposed guide to frame early implementation science collaboration discussions\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Best, Sanne Peters, Lisa Guccione, Jillian Francis, Marlena Klaic\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tbm/ibae044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Miscommunication between health care practitioners and implementation researchers can lead to a mismatch of expectations and understandings, resulting in wasted research and frustration. Conversely, combining the expertise and knowledge of those working in health care practice and implementation research can deliver context informed research questions and appropriate study designs. Achieving this ambition requires a shared language. We sought to develop a guide to identify a common language to constructively explore nascent implementation research concepts. We set up a working group, comprising of implementation researchers, health care practitioners and operational managers, to work through ideas generation, debate and a consensus process to generate and refine a discussion guide. The resultant guide steps health care practitioners and implementation researchers through a three-phase enquiry - Question 1: What is the implementation question? Question 2: What is the proposed implementation solution? And Question 3: How can the investigation of this idea be resourced? At each step, the health care practitioner and implementation researcher collaborate to include theory and practice and rigorously work through the question to build implementation on evidence and to promote diverse stakeholder engagement. The next steps for this study will be operationalising the discussion guide, as an interactive tool. Future evaluation, to test effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility will be designed with health care practitioners and implementation researchers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"398 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibae044\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibae044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健从业人员和实施研究人员之间的沟通不畅可能导致期望和理解的不一致,从而造成研究的浪费和挫败感。相反,如果能将医疗实践和实施研究人员的专业技能和知识结合起来,就能提出符合实际情况的研究问题和适当的研究设计。实现这一目标需要一种共同的语言。我们试图制定一份指南,以确定一种共同语言,从而建设性地探索新生的实施研究概念。我们成立了一个由实施研究人员、医疗保健从业人员和业务管理人员组成的工作组,通过构思、辩论和达成共识的过程来生成和完善讨论指南。由此产生的指南将医疗从业人员和实施研究人员分为三个阶段--问题 1:实施问题是什么?问题 2:建议的实施方案是什么?问题 3:如何为这一想法的调查提供资源?在每一个步骤中,医疗保健从业人员和实施研究人员都会合作,将理论和实践结合起来,并通过严格的工作来解决问题,从而将实施建立在证据的基础上,并促进不同利益相关者的参与。本研究的下一步工作是将讨论指南作为互动工具投入使用。未来将与医疗保健从业人员和实施研究人员一起设计评估,以检验有效性、可接受性和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a shared language: a proposed guide to frame early implementation science collaboration discussions
Miscommunication between health care practitioners and implementation researchers can lead to a mismatch of expectations and understandings, resulting in wasted research and frustration. Conversely, combining the expertise and knowledge of those working in health care practice and implementation research can deliver context informed research questions and appropriate study designs. Achieving this ambition requires a shared language. We sought to develop a guide to identify a common language to constructively explore nascent implementation research concepts. We set up a working group, comprising of implementation researchers, health care practitioners and operational managers, to work through ideas generation, debate and a consensus process to generate and refine a discussion guide. The resultant guide steps health care practitioners and implementation researchers through a three-phase enquiry - Question 1: What is the implementation question? Question 2: What is the proposed implementation solution? And Question 3: How can the investigation of this idea be resourced? At each step, the health care practitioner and implementation researcher collaborate to include theory and practice and rigorously work through the question to build implementation on evidence and to promote diverse stakeholder engagement. The next steps for this study will be operationalising the discussion guide, as an interactive tool. Future evaluation, to test effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility will be designed with health care practitioners and implementation researchers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信