全球卫生合作成功的关键:研究、伦理和社区参与

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Athula Sumathipala, Oshini Sri Jayasinghe, Buddhika Fernando
{"title":"全球卫生合作成功的关键:研究、伦理和社区参与","authors":"Athula Sumathipala, Oshini Sri Jayasinghe, Buddhika Fernando","doi":"10.1136/leader-2023-000901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Democracy is the government of the people, by the people and for the people, according to the ancient Greeks and Abraham Lincoln. Similarly, health research needs to be of low- and middle-income country (LMIC) people, by LMIC people and for people in LMICs, as well as of, by and for people in high-income countries (HICs). Vestigial views of ‘global health research should be driven by our agenda and the outputs belong to us since we pay for it’ can still be heard despite the calls for and drive towards more equitable partnerships in global health. Organisations such as the US NIH (Working Group on Promoting Equity in Global Health Research Collaborations)1 and the UKRI (UK Collaborative on Development Research ‘Building Partnerships of Equals’)2 are working towards fairer research partnerships. There has been much written on equitable partnerships, recognising the importance in its own right,3 4 as well as in ensuring sustainability, efficiency and yielding better outcomes.5 One of the early writings on conducting ethical research in developing countries by Emanuel et al 6 emphasised the need for minimising exploitation and collaborative partnerships. More recent writing by Kumar et al discussed the systemic inequalities reinforcing inequities and the need for individual and institutional empowerment in combating such inequity.7 Our experiences indicate three areas upon which equitable global health partnerships are built: equity in research, ethics as a mandatory requirement and community engagement and involvement (CEI). ### The role of research in global health: bidirectional knowledge flows We believe research is the way forward to address this inequity in global health. Research collaborations among HICs and LMICs can be the way forward to close the health, research and publication gap between Global North and Global South.5 In the current context of the 10/90 (LMIC/HIC) divide in resource allocation, research funding and publications, as well as the disproportionate …","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key to successful global health collaborations: research, ethics and community engagement and involvement\",\"authors\":\"Athula Sumathipala, Oshini Sri Jayasinghe, Buddhika Fernando\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/leader-2023-000901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Democracy is the government of the people, by the people and for the people, according to the ancient Greeks and Abraham Lincoln. Similarly, health research needs to be of low- and middle-income country (LMIC) people, by LMIC people and for people in LMICs, as well as of, by and for people in high-income countries (HICs). Vestigial views of ‘global health research should be driven by our agenda and the outputs belong to us since we pay for it’ can still be heard despite the calls for and drive towards more equitable partnerships in global health. Organisations such as the US NIH (Working Group on Promoting Equity in Global Health Research Collaborations)1 and the UKRI (UK Collaborative on Development Research ‘Building Partnerships of Equals’)2 are working towards fairer research partnerships. There has been much written on equitable partnerships, recognising the importance in its own right,3 4 as well as in ensuring sustainability, efficiency and yielding better outcomes.5 One of the early writings on conducting ethical research in developing countries by Emanuel et al 6 emphasised the need for minimising exploitation and collaborative partnerships. More recent writing by Kumar et al discussed the systemic inequalities reinforcing inequities and the need for individual and institutional empowerment in combating such inequity.7 Our experiences indicate three areas upon which equitable global health partnerships are built: equity in research, ethics as a mandatory requirement and community engagement and involvement (CEI). ### The role of research in global health: bidirectional knowledge flows We believe research is the way forward to address this inequity in global health. Research collaborations among HICs and LMICs can be the way forward to close the health, research and publication gap between Global North and Global South.5 In the current context of the 10/90 (LMIC/HIC) divide in resource allocation, research funding and publications, as well as the disproportionate …\",\"PeriodicalId\":36677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Leader\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Leader\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2023-000901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2023-000901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

古希腊人和亚伯拉罕-林肯认为,民主是民有、民治、民享的政府。同样,卫生研究既要面向中低收入国家(LMIC)的人民,由中低收入国家的人民开展,为中低收入国家的人民服务,也要面向高收入国家(HICs)的人民,由高收入国家的人民开展,为高收入国家的人民服务。尽管人们呼吁并推动在全球卫生领域建立更加公平的伙伴关系,但 "全球卫生研究应由我们的议程驱动,研究成果属于我们,因为我们为此付出了代价 "的残余观点仍不绝于耳。美国国立卫生研究院(促进全球健康研究合作公平性工作组)1 和英国发展研究合作组织(英国发展研究合作组织,"建立平等的合作伙伴关系")2 等组织正致力于建立更公平的研究合作伙伴关系。伊曼纽尔等人早期撰写的关于在发展中国家开展合乎伦理的研究的著作6 强调了最大限度地减少剥削和建立合作伙伴关系的必要性。库马尔等人最近的著作讨论了系统性不平等加剧不平等的问题,以及增强个人和机构能力以消除这种不平等的必要性。7 我们的经验表明,公平的全球卫生伙伴关系建立在以下三个方面:研究公平、将伦理作为强制性要求以及社区参与和介入(CEI)。### 研究在全球卫生中的作用:双向知识流动 我们认为,研究是解决全球卫生不公平问题的出路。高收入国家和低收入国家之间的研究合作是缩小全球北方和全球南方在卫生、研究和出版方面差距的出路。5 在当前资源分配、研究资金和出版物方面存在 10/90(低收入国家/高收入国家)鸿沟的背景下,以及在全球南方和高收入国家之间存在不成比例的...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key to successful global health collaborations: research, ethics and community engagement and involvement
Democracy is the government of the people, by the people and for the people, according to the ancient Greeks and Abraham Lincoln. Similarly, health research needs to be of low- and middle-income country (LMIC) people, by LMIC people and for people in LMICs, as well as of, by and for people in high-income countries (HICs). Vestigial views of ‘global health research should be driven by our agenda and the outputs belong to us since we pay for it’ can still be heard despite the calls for and drive towards more equitable partnerships in global health. Organisations such as the US NIH (Working Group on Promoting Equity in Global Health Research Collaborations)1 and the UKRI (UK Collaborative on Development Research ‘Building Partnerships of Equals’)2 are working towards fairer research partnerships. There has been much written on equitable partnerships, recognising the importance in its own right,3 4 as well as in ensuring sustainability, efficiency and yielding better outcomes.5 One of the early writings on conducting ethical research in developing countries by Emanuel et al 6 emphasised the need for minimising exploitation and collaborative partnerships. More recent writing by Kumar et al discussed the systemic inequalities reinforcing inequities and the need for individual and institutional empowerment in combating such inequity.7 Our experiences indicate three areas upon which equitable global health partnerships are built: equity in research, ethics as a mandatory requirement and community engagement and involvement (CEI). ### The role of research in global health: bidirectional knowledge flows We believe research is the way forward to address this inequity in global health. Research collaborations among HICs and LMICs can be the way forward to close the health, research and publication gap between Global North and Global South.5 In the current context of the 10/90 (LMIC/HIC) divide in resource allocation, research funding and publications, as well as the disproportionate …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信