成人晶状体碎片滞留者行玻璃体旁切除术的时间:系统综述和荟萃分析。

Michelle Lim,Irina Sverdlichenko,Elizabeth Y Wei,Andrew Mihalache,Marko M Popovic,Mohammed Alfalah,Miguel Cruz Pimentel,Rajeev H Muni,Peter J Kertes
{"title":"成人晶状体碎片滞留者行玻璃体旁切除术的时间:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Michelle Lim,Irina Sverdlichenko,Elizabeth Y Wei,Andrew Mihalache,Marko M Popovic,Mohammed Alfalah,Miguel Cruz Pimentel,Rajeev H Muni,Peter J Kertes","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nThis review and meta-analysis compare visual outcomes and complication risk based on the timing of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) following cataract surgery with retained lens fragments.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nMEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched between 2000 to February 2022 for studies comparing visual outcomes and complications based on time to PPV. Discrete outcomes were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis model on Review Manager (RevMan 5.4). The certainty of evidence of outcomes was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTen studies and 1,693 eyes were included. The incidence of patients achieving a final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of >6/12 Snellen may be similar among patients receiving PPV within 1 week or after 1 week of cataract surgery (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = [0.96, 1.17], p = 0.25), and patients receiving PPV within 1 month or after 1 month of cataract surgery (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = [0.95, 1.32]; p = 0.18). Incidence of glaucoma or elevated intraocular pressure for patients may be similar among patients receiving PPV within 1 week or after 1 week of cataract surgery (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = [0.62, 1.87]; p = 0.79), and patients receiving PPV within 1 month or after 1 month of cataract surgery (RR = 0.33, 95% CI = [0.09, 1.23]; p = 0.10).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nIncidence of patients achieving a final BCVA of >6/12 Snellen or postoperative adverse effects was similar between patients who underwent early and late PPV following cataract surgery. However, all studies had an overall serious risk of bias, primarily because of confounding and reporting bias.","PeriodicalId":501659,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time to pars plana vitrectomy in adults with retained lens fragments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Lim,Irina Sverdlichenko,Elizabeth Y Wei,Andrew Mihalache,Marko M Popovic,Mohammed Alfalah,Miguel Cruz Pimentel,Rajeev H Muni,Peter J Kertes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\r\\nThis review and meta-analysis compare visual outcomes and complication risk based on the timing of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) following cataract surgery with retained lens fragments.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nMEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched between 2000 to February 2022 for studies comparing visual outcomes and complications based on time to PPV. Discrete outcomes were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis model on Review Manager (RevMan 5.4). The certainty of evidence of outcomes was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nTen studies and 1,693 eyes were included. The incidence of patients achieving a final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of >6/12 Snellen may be similar among patients receiving PPV within 1 week or after 1 week of cataract surgery (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = [0.96, 1.17], p = 0.25), and patients receiving PPV within 1 month or after 1 month of cataract surgery (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = [0.95, 1.32]; p = 0.18). Incidence of glaucoma or elevated intraocular pressure for patients may be similar among patients receiving PPV within 1 week or after 1 week of cataract surgery (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = [0.62, 1.87]; p = 0.79), and patients receiving PPV within 1 month or after 1 month of cataract surgery (RR = 0.33, 95% CI = [0.09, 1.23]; p = 0.10).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nIncidence of patients achieving a final BCVA of >6/12 Snellen or postoperative adverse effects was similar between patients who underwent early and late PPV following cataract surgery. However, all studies had an overall serious risk of bias, primarily because of confounding and reporting bias.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.08.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.08.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法检索2000年至2022年2月期间的MEDLINE (Ovid)、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,根据PPV的时间比较视觉结果和并发症风险。使用Review Manager (RevMan 5.4)上的随机效应荟萃分析模型对离散结果进行分析。结果纳入了 10 项研究和 1,693 只眼睛。白内障手术后 1 周内或 1 周后接受 PPV 的患者(RR = 1.06,95% CI = [0.96,1.17],p = 0.25)以及白内障手术后 1 个月内或 1 个月后接受 PPV 的患者(RR = 1.12,95% CI = [0.95,1.32];p = 0.18)最终最佳矫正视力 (BCVA) >6/12 Snellen 的发生率可能相似。白内障手术后 1 周内或 1 周后接受 PPV 的患者青光眼或眼压升高的发生率可能相似(RR = 1.08,95% CI = [0.62,1.87];P = 0.79),白内障手术后 1 个月内或 1 个月后接受 PPV 的患者青光眼或眼压升高的发生率可能相似(RR = 0.结论白内障手术后早期和晚期接受 PPV 的患者最终 BCVA >6/12 Snellen 或术后不良反应的发生率相似。然而,所有研究总体上都存在严重的偏倚风险,主要原因是混杂因素和报告偏倚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time to pars plana vitrectomy in adults with retained lens fragments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION This review and meta-analysis compare visual outcomes and complication risk based on the timing of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) following cataract surgery with retained lens fragments. METHODS MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched between 2000 to February 2022 for studies comparing visual outcomes and complications based on time to PPV. Discrete outcomes were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis model on Review Manager (RevMan 5.4). The certainty of evidence of outcomes was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS Ten studies and 1,693 eyes were included. The incidence of patients achieving a final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of >6/12 Snellen may be similar among patients receiving PPV within 1 week or after 1 week of cataract surgery (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = [0.96, 1.17], p = 0.25), and patients receiving PPV within 1 month or after 1 month of cataract surgery (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = [0.95, 1.32]; p = 0.18). Incidence of glaucoma or elevated intraocular pressure for patients may be similar among patients receiving PPV within 1 week or after 1 week of cataract surgery (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = [0.62, 1.87]; p = 0.79), and patients receiving PPV within 1 month or after 1 month of cataract surgery (RR = 0.33, 95% CI = [0.09, 1.23]; p = 0.10). CONCLUSION Incidence of patients achieving a final BCVA of >6/12 Snellen or postoperative adverse effects was similar between patients who underwent early and late PPV following cataract surgery. However, all studies had an overall serious risk of bias, primarily because of confounding and reporting bias.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信