改进敏感性分析,综合有限重叠的随机临床试验

Kuan Jiang, Wenjie Hu, Shu Yang, Xinxing Lai, Xiaohua Zhou
{"title":"改进敏感性分析,综合有限重叠的随机临床试验","authors":"Kuan Jiang, Wenjie Hu, Shu Yang, Xinxing Lai, Xiaohua Zhou","doi":"arxiv-2409.07391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To estimate the average treatment effect in real-world populations,\nobservational studies are typically designed around real-world cohorts.\nHowever, even when study samples from these designs represent the population,\nunmeasured confounders can introduce bias. Sensitivity analysis is often used\nto estimate bounds for the average treatment effect without relying on the\nstrict mathematical assumptions of other existing methods. This article\nintroduces a new approach that improves sensitivity analysis in observational\nstudies by incorporating randomized clinical trial data, even with limited\noverlap due to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Theoretical proof and simulations\nshow that this method provides a tighter bound width than existing approaches.\nWe also apply this method to both a trial dataset and a real-world drug\neffectiveness comparison dataset for practical analysis.","PeriodicalId":501425,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improve Sensitivity Analysis Synthesizing Randomized Clinical Trials With Limited Overlap\",\"authors\":\"Kuan Jiang, Wenjie Hu, Shu Yang, Xinxing Lai, Xiaohua Zhou\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.07391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To estimate the average treatment effect in real-world populations,\\nobservational studies are typically designed around real-world cohorts.\\nHowever, even when study samples from these designs represent the population,\\nunmeasured confounders can introduce bias. Sensitivity analysis is often used\\nto estimate bounds for the average treatment effect without relying on the\\nstrict mathematical assumptions of other existing methods. This article\\nintroduces a new approach that improves sensitivity analysis in observational\\nstudies by incorporating randomized clinical trial data, even with limited\\noverlap due to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Theoretical proof and simulations\\nshow that this method provides a tighter bound width than existing approaches.\\nWe also apply this method to both a trial dataset and a real-world drug\\neffectiveness comparison dataset for practical analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Methodology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了估算真实世界人群的平均治疗效果,观察性研究通常围绕真实世界的队列进行设计。然而,即使这些设计中的研究样本代表了人群,未测量的混杂因素也会带来偏差。敏感性分析通常用于估计平均治疗效果的界限,而无需依赖其他现有方法的严格数学假设。本文介绍了一种新方法,通过纳入随机临床试验数据来改进观察性研究中的灵敏度分析,即使由于纳入/排除标准造成的重叠有限。理论证明和模拟结果表明,与现有方法相比,这种方法能提供更严格的边界宽度。我们还将这种方法应用于试验数据集和真实世界的药物疗效比较数据集,以进行实际分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improve Sensitivity Analysis Synthesizing Randomized Clinical Trials With Limited Overlap
To estimate the average treatment effect in real-world populations, observational studies are typically designed around real-world cohorts. However, even when study samples from these designs represent the population, unmeasured confounders can introduce bias. Sensitivity analysis is often used to estimate bounds for the average treatment effect without relying on the strict mathematical assumptions of other existing methods. This article introduces a new approach that improves sensitivity analysis in observational studies by incorporating randomized clinical trial data, even with limited overlap due to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Theoretical proof and simulations show that this method provides a tighter bound width than existing approaches. We also apply this method to both a trial dataset and a real-world drug effectiveness comparison dataset for practical analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信