使用碳纤维增强聚合物粘结方法加固钢桁梁桥斜拉构件的实验研究

IF 2.1 4区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Ngoc Vinh Pham, Kazuo Ohgaki, Takeshi Miyashita, Ngoc Quang Pham
{"title":"使用碳纤维增强聚合物粘结方法加固钢桁梁桥斜拉构件的实验研究","authors":"Ngoc Vinh Pham, Kazuo Ohgaki, Takeshi Miyashita, Ngoc Quang Pham","doi":"10.1177/13694332241281545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the effectiveness of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) materials in strengthening the diagonal tension members of steel-truss bridges. Monotonic tensile and cyclic loading tests were performed on CFRP-strengthened specimens with variations in the CFRP-bonding range on the flanges. This study focused on the strengthening methods A and B, which were proposed to address insufficient CFRP anchoring near gusset plates by bonding CFRP sheets to both sides of the flanges of the diagonal tension members. The results of the monotonic tensile loading tests indicated a significant increase in tensile stiffness and substantial improvements in yield strength (27%) and ultimate load-bearing capacity (51%) when the strengthening methods A and B were employed. Delamination of the bonded CFRP sheets was effectively delayed, occurring only after the steel yielded, owing to the use of a ductile adhesive (polyurea putty). On the other hand, the cyclic loading tests demonstrated a significant enhancement in the load-bearing capacities (33% for tensile, 32% for compressive) of the strengthened specimens. Moreover, the energy dissipation capacities of the specimens strengthened by methods A and B exhibited linear increases, with 12% and 14% higher values respectively than those of the non-strengthened specimen. Although the stiffnesses (tensile and compressive) of the strengthened specimens decreased in each loading loop, the strengthening methods A and B maintained the stiffness values at approximately 35% higher than those of the non-strengthened specimen.","PeriodicalId":50849,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study on strengthening steel-truss bridge diagonal members using carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer bonding methods\",\"authors\":\"Ngoc Vinh Pham, Kazuo Ohgaki, Takeshi Miyashita, Ngoc Quang Pham\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13694332241281545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated the effectiveness of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) materials in strengthening the diagonal tension members of steel-truss bridges. Monotonic tensile and cyclic loading tests were performed on CFRP-strengthened specimens with variations in the CFRP-bonding range on the flanges. This study focused on the strengthening methods A and B, which were proposed to address insufficient CFRP anchoring near gusset plates by bonding CFRP sheets to both sides of the flanges of the diagonal tension members. The results of the monotonic tensile loading tests indicated a significant increase in tensile stiffness and substantial improvements in yield strength (27%) and ultimate load-bearing capacity (51%) when the strengthening methods A and B were employed. Delamination of the bonded CFRP sheets was effectively delayed, occurring only after the steel yielded, owing to the use of a ductile adhesive (polyurea putty). On the other hand, the cyclic loading tests demonstrated a significant enhancement in the load-bearing capacities (33% for tensile, 32% for compressive) of the strengthened specimens. Moreover, the energy dissipation capacities of the specimens strengthened by methods A and B exhibited linear increases, with 12% and 14% higher values respectively than those of the non-strengthened specimen. Although the stiffnesses (tensile and compressive) of the strengthened specimens decreased in each loading loop, the strengthening methods A and B maintained the stiffness values at approximately 35% higher than those of the non-strengthened specimen.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332241281545\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332241281545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)材料在加固钢桁梁桥梁斜拉构件方面的有效性。对 CFRP 加固试样进行了单调拉伸和循环加载试验,试样翼缘上的 CFRP 粘结范围有所变化。本研究重点关注了 A 和 B 两种加固方法,这两种方法是通过在斜拉构件翼缘两侧粘结 CFRP 片材来解决桁架板附近 CFRP 锚固不足的问题。单调拉伸加载试验结果表明,采用 A 和 B 加固方法后,拉伸刚度显著增加,屈服强度(27%)和极限承载能力(51%)大幅提高。由于使用了韧性粘合剂(聚脲腻子),粘合 CFRP 片材的分层被有效延迟,仅在钢材屈服后才发生。另一方面,循环加载试验表明,加固试样的承载能力显著提高(拉伸能力提高 33%,压缩能力提高 32%)。此外,采用 A 和 B 方法加固的试样的能量耗散能力呈线性增长,分别比未加固试样高出 12% 和 14%。虽然加固试样的刚度(拉伸和压缩)在每个加载循环中都有所下降,但加固方法 A 和 B 保持了比未加固试样高出约 35% 的刚度值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental study on strengthening steel-truss bridge diagonal members using carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer bonding methods
This study investigated the effectiveness of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) materials in strengthening the diagonal tension members of steel-truss bridges. Monotonic tensile and cyclic loading tests were performed on CFRP-strengthened specimens with variations in the CFRP-bonding range on the flanges. This study focused on the strengthening methods A and B, which were proposed to address insufficient CFRP anchoring near gusset plates by bonding CFRP sheets to both sides of the flanges of the diagonal tension members. The results of the monotonic tensile loading tests indicated a significant increase in tensile stiffness and substantial improvements in yield strength (27%) and ultimate load-bearing capacity (51%) when the strengthening methods A and B were employed. Delamination of the bonded CFRP sheets was effectively delayed, occurring only after the steel yielded, owing to the use of a ductile adhesive (polyurea putty). On the other hand, the cyclic loading tests demonstrated a significant enhancement in the load-bearing capacities (33% for tensile, 32% for compressive) of the strengthened specimens. Moreover, the energy dissipation capacities of the specimens strengthened by methods A and B exhibited linear increases, with 12% and 14% higher values respectively than those of the non-strengthened specimen. Although the stiffnesses (tensile and compressive) of the strengthened specimens decreased in each loading loop, the strengthening methods A and B maintained the stiffness values at approximately 35% higher than those of the non-strengthened specimen.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Structural Engineering
Advances in Structural Engineering 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
230
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Advances in Structural Engineering was established in 1997 and has become one of the major peer-reviewed journals in the field of structural engineering. To better fulfil the mission of the journal, we have recently decided to launch two new features for the journal: (a) invited review papers providing an in-depth exposition of a topic of significant current interest; (b) short papers reporting truly new technologies in structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信