模型模糊条件下的成本效益回报

IF 1.1 2区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Carole Bernard, Gero Junike, Thibaut Lux, Steven Vanduffel
{"title":"模型模糊条件下的成本效益回报","authors":"Carole Bernard, Gero Junike, Thibaut Lux, Steven Vanduffel","doi":"10.1007/s00780-024-00547-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dybvig (1988a, 1988b) solves in a complete market setting the problem of finding a payoff that is cheapest possible in reaching a given target distribution (“cost-efficient payoff”). In the presence of ambiguity, the distribution of a payoff is, however, no longer known with certainty. We study the problem of finding the cheapest possible payoff whose worst-case distribution stochastically dominates a given target distribution (“robust cost-efficient payoff”) and determine solutions under certain conditions. We study the link between “robust cost-efficiency” and the maxmin expected utility setting of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989), as well as more generally in a possibly nonexpected robust utility setting. Specifically, we show that solutions to maxmin robust expected utility are necessarily robust cost-efficient. We illustrate our study with examples involving uncertainty both on the drift and on the volatility of the risky asset.</p>","PeriodicalId":50447,"journal":{"name":"Finance and Stochastics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-efficient payoffs under model ambiguity\",\"authors\":\"Carole Bernard, Gero Junike, Thibaut Lux, Steven Vanduffel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00780-024-00547-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Dybvig (1988a, 1988b) solves in a complete market setting the problem of finding a payoff that is cheapest possible in reaching a given target distribution (“cost-efficient payoff”). In the presence of ambiguity, the distribution of a payoff is, however, no longer known with certainty. We study the problem of finding the cheapest possible payoff whose worst-case distribution stochastically dominates a given target distribution (“robust cost-efficient payoff”) and determine solutions under certain conditions. We study the link between “robust cost-efficiency” and the maxmin expected utility setting of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989), as well as more generally in a possibly nonexpected robust utility setting. Specifically, we show that solutions to maxmin robust expected utility are necessarily robust cost-efficient. We illustrate our study with examples involving uncertainty both on the drift and on the volatility of the risky asset.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance and Stochastics\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance and Stochastics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-024-00547-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance and Stochastics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-024-00547-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Dybvig(1988a,1988b)在完全市场环境中解决了一个问题,即找到一个在达到给定目标分布("成本效益报酬")时最便宜的报酬。然而,在存在模糊性的情况下,报酬的分布不再是确定无疑的。我们研究了如何找到最坏情况分布随机支配给定目标分布的最便宜报酬("稳健成本效益报酬")的问题,并确定了某些条件下的解决方案。我们研究了 "稳健成本效益 "与 Gilboa 和 Schmeidler(1989 年)的最大最小预期效用设置之间的联系,以及在可能的非预期稳健效用设置中的一般联系。具体来说,我们证明最大最小稳健预期效用的解必然是稳健成本效率解。我们用涉及风险资产漂移和波动不确定性的例子来说明我们的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cost-efficient payoffs under model ambiguity

Cost-efficient payoffs under model ambiguity

Dybvig (1988a, 1988b) solves in a complete market setting the problem of finding a payoff that is cheapest possible in reaching a given target distribution (“cost-efficient payoff”). In the presence of ambiguity, the distribution of a payoff is, however, no longer known with certainty. We study the problem of finding the cheapest possible payoff whose worst-case distribution stochastically dominates a given target distribution (“robust cost-efficient payoff”) and determine solutions under certain conditions. We study the link between “robust cost-efficiency” and the maxmin expected utility setting of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989), as well as more generally in a possibly nonexpected robust utility setting. Specifically, we show that solutions to maxmin robust expected utility are necessarily robust cost-efficient. We illustrate our study with examples involving uncertainty both on the drift and on the volatility of the risky asset.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Finance and Stochastics
Finance and Stochastics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of Finance and Stochastics is to provide a high standard publication forum for research - in all areas of finance based on stochastic methods - on specific topics in mathematics (in particular probability theory, statistics and stochastic analysis) motivated by the analysis of problems in finance. Finance and Stochastics encompasses - but is not limited to - the following fields: - theory and analysis of financial markets - continuous time finance - derivatives research - insurance in relation to finance - portfolio selection - credit and market risks - term structure models - statistical and empirical financial studies based on advanced stochastic methods - numerical and stochastic solution techniques for problems in finance - intertemporal economics, uncertainty and information in relation to finance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信