粪肥及其生物炭影响耕地中土壤胞外酶的活性和化学计量

IF 2.8 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Zhengfeng An, Cole D. Gross, Xinli Chen, Edward W. Bork, Cameron N. Carlyle, Scott X. Chang
{"title":"粪肥及其生物炭影响耕地中土壤胞外酶的活性和化学计量","authors":"Zhengfeng An, Cole D. Gross, Xinli Chen, Edward W. Bork, Cameron N. Carlyle, Scott X. Chang","doi":"10.1007/s11368-024-03887-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The influence of organic amendments on the interplay among soil extracellular enzyme activities (EEAs) and their stoichiometry (EES) and nutrient availabilities, key indicators of resource limitations for soil microbes, is poorly understood. This study aims to investigate how manure compost (hereafter “manure”) and its biochar derivative affect EEAs, EES and soil fertility.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and methods</h3><p>We studied EEAs (BG, β-glucosidase; CBH, cellobiohydrolase; LAP, Leucine aminopeptidase; NAG, β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase and AP, acid phosphatase), EES and soil fertility two years post-application of manure and biochar in central Alberta, Canada.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results and discussion</h3><p>Applying manure and its biochar did not affect soil permanganate oxidable carbon (C), total phosphorus (P), and available P and nitroegn (N). Manure application increased NAG activity by 13.9% (75.9 nmol h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> soil) relative to the control (66.6 nmol h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> soil), whereas biochar application increased LAP activity by 22.1% (64.6 nmol h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> soil) compared to the manure treatment (52.9 nmol h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> soil), suggesting that manure addition caused microbial C limitation, while biochar addition led to microbial N limitation. However, both manure and biochar treatments did not affect soil NAG, CBH and AP, and enzymatic C:N, C:P, and N:P stoichiometry. Manure and biochar and their interactions with the soil ultimately affect soil physicochemical properties.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Manure and its biochar differentially altered some soil N-cycling EEAs and C and N limitations two years after their applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17139,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soils and Sediments","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manure and its biochar affect activities and stoichiometry of soil extracellular enzymes in croplands\",\"authors\":\"Zhengfeng An, Cole D. Gross, Xinli Chen, Edward W. Bork, Cameron N. Carlyle, Scott X. Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11368-024-03887-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>The influence of organic amendments on the interplay among soil extracellular enzyme activities (EEAs) and their stoichiometry (EES) and nutrient availabilities, key indicators of resource limitations for soil microbes, is poorly understood. This study aims to investigate how manure compost (hereafter “manure”) and its biochar derivative affect EEAs, EES and soil fertility.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Materials and methods</h3><p>We studied EEAs (BG, β-glucosidase; CBH, cellobiohydrolase; LAP, Leucine aminopeptidase; NAG, β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase and AP, acid phosphatase), EES and soil fertility two years post-application of manure and biochar in central Alberta, Canada.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results and discussion</h3><p>Applying manure and its biochar did not affect soil permanganate oxidable carbon (C), total phosphorus (P), and available P and nitroegn (N). Manure application increased NAG activity by 13.9% (75.9 nmol h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> soil) relative to the control (66.6 nmol h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> soil), whereas biochar application increased LAP activity by 22.1% (64.6 nmol h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> soil) compared to the manure treatment (52.9 nmol h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> soil), suggesting that manure addition caused microbial C limitation, while biochar addition led to microbial N limitation. However, both manure and biochar treatments did not affect soil NAG, CBH and AP, and enzymatic C:N, C:P, and N:P stoichiometry. Manure and biochar and their interactions with the soil ultimately affect soil physicochemical properties.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Manure and its biochar differentially altered some soil N-cycling EEAs and C and N limitations two years after their applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Soils and Sediments\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Soils and Sediments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-024-03887-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soils and Sediments","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-024-03887-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 人们对有机添加剂对土壤胞外酶活性(EEAs)及其化学计量(EES)和养分利用率(土壤微生物资源限制的关键指标)之间相互作用的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨粪肥堆肥(以下简称 "粪肥")及其生物炭衍生物如何影响 EEAs、EES 和土壤肥力。材料与方法我们在加拿大阿尔伯塔省中部研究了施用粪肥和生物炭两年后的 EEAs(BG,β-葡萄糖苷酶;CBH,纤维生物水解酶;LAP,亮氨酸氨肽酶;NAG,β-1,4-N-乙酰氨基糖苷酶;AP,酸性磷酸酶)、EES 和土壤肥力。结果与讨论施用粪肥及其生物炭不会影响土壤中的高锰酸盐氧化碳(C)、总磷(P)、可利用磷和硝基氮(N)。与对照组(66.6 nmol h-1 g-1 土壤)相比,施用粪肥使 NAG 活性提高了 13.9% (75.9 nmol h-1 g-1 土壤),而与粪肥处理(52.9 nmol h-1 g-1 土壤)相比,施用生物炭使 LAP 活性提高了 22.1% (64.6 nmol h-1 g-1 土壤),这表明施用粪肥导致了微生物的 C 限制,而施用生物炭则导致了微生物的 N 限制。然而,粪肥和生物炭处理并不影响土壤中的 NAG、CBH 和 AP 以及酶促 C:N、C:P 和 N:P 的化学计量。粪肥和生物炭及其与土壤的相互作用最终会影响土壤理化性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Manure and its biochar affect activities and stoichiometry of soil extracellular enzymes in croplands

Manure and its biochar affect activities and stoichiometry of soil extracellular enzymes in croplands

Purpose

The influence of organic amendments on the interplay among soil extracellular enzyme activities (EEAs) and their stoichiometry (EES) and nutrient availabilities, key indicators of resource limitations for soil microbes, is poorly understood. This study aims to investigate how manure compost (hereafter “manure”) and its biochar derivative affect EEAs, EES and soil fertility.

Materials and methods

We studied EEAs (BG, β-glucosidase; CBH, cellobiohydrolase; LAP, Leucine aminopeptidase; NAG, β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase and AP, acid phosphatase), EES and soil fertility two years post-application of manure and biochar in central Alberta, Canada.

Results and discussion

Applying manure and its biochar did not affect soil permanganate oxidable carbon (C), total phosphorus (P), and available P and nitroegn (N). Manure application increased NAG activity by 13.9% (75.9 nmol h−1 g−1 soil) relative to the control (66.6 nmol h−1 g−1 soil), whereas biochar application increased LAP activity by 22.1% (64.6 nmol h−1 g−1 soil) compared to the manure treatment (52.9 nmol h−1 g−1 soil), suggesting that manure addition caused microbial C limitation, while biochar addition led to microbial N limitation. However, both manure and biochar treatments did not affect soil NAG, CBH and AP, and enzymatic C:N, C:P, and N:P stoichiometry. Manure and biochar and their interactions with the soil ultimately affect soil physicochemical properties.

Conclusions

Manure and its biochar differentially altered some soil N-cycling EEAs and C and N limitations two years after their applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Soils and Sediments
Journal of Soils and Sediments 环境科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
256
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Soils and Sediments (JSS) is devoted to soils and sediments; it deals with contaminated, intact and disturbed soils and sediments. JSS explores both the common aspects and the differences between these two environmental compartments. Inter-linkages at the catchment scale and with the Earth’s system (inter-compartment) are an important topic in JSS. The range of research coverage includes the effects of disturbances and contamination; research, strategies and technologies for prediction, prevention, and protection; identification and characterization; treatment, remediation and reuse; risk assessment and management; creation and implementation of quality standards; international regulation and legislation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信