{"title":"利用选择性混合微生物联合体厌氧消化厨余垃圾及其不同优化方法的评估","authors":"Neeraj Raja Ram, G. N. Nikhil","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-02034-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food waste (FW) is a valuable resource for anaerobic digestion (AD) due to its biochemical composition. This study aimed to optimize AD using two widely used optimization methods: Response Surface Methodology with Box–Behnken Design (RSM-BBD) and Taguchi orthogonal array L9. Organic load, oxidation–reduction potential, pH, and hydraulic retention time were evaluated for biogas production and volatile solids removal (VS<sub>r</sub>). The Taguchi method assessed responses based on the signal-to-noise ratio, resulting in optimal conditions for AD. After numerical optimization, the predicted biogas production was 440 mL, and VS<sub>r</sub> was 19.5%. However, the experimental observations of biogas production were 850 mL, and VS<sub>r</sub> was 41%. The RSM-BBD method, calculated based on analysis of variance, resulted in optimal conditions for AD, and after numerical optimization, the predicted biogas production was 852 mL, and VS<sub>r</sub> was 43%. However, the experimental observations of biogas production were 906 mL, and VS<sub>r</sub> was 44. Despite these results, the study found that Taguchi’s design provided approximate optimization response values and did not allow parameter interaction. In contrast, RSM-BBD provided precise optimal values and details on the impact of individual and combined parameters, making RSM-BBD the preferred choice for optimizing AD systems for better prediction accuracy and reproducibility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"26 6","pages":"3370 - 3383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10163-024-02034-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anaerobic digestion of food waste with a selective mixed-microbial consortium and its evaluation with different optimization methods\",\"authors\":\"Neeraj Raja Ram, G. N. Nikhil\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10163-024-02034-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Food waste (FW) is a valuable resource for anaerobic digestion (AD) due to its biochemical composition. This study aimed to optimize AD using two widely used optimization methods: Response Surface Methodology with Box–Behnken Design (RSM-BBD) and Taguchi orthogonal array L9. Organic load, oxidation–reduction potential, pH, and hydraulic retention time were evaluated for biogas production and volatile solids removal (VS<sub>r</sub>). The Taguchi method assessed responses based on the signal-to-noise ratio, resulting in optimal conditions for AD. After numerical optimization, the predicted biogas production was 440 mL, and VS<sub>r</sub> was 19.5%. However, the experimental observations of biogas production were 850 mL, and VS<sub>r</sub> was 41%. The RSM-BBD method, calculated based on analysis of variance, resulted in optimal conditions for AD, and after numerical optimization, the predicted biogas production was 852 mL, and VS<sub>r</sub> was 43%. However, the experimental observations of biogas production were 906 mL, and VS<sub>r</sub> was 44. Despite these results, the study found that Taguchi’s design provided approximate optimization response values and did not allow parameter interaction. In contrast, RSM-BBD provided precise optimal values and details on the impact of individual and combined parameters, making RSM-BBD the preferred choice for optimizing AD systems for better prediction accuracy and reproducibility.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"3370 - 3383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10163-024-02034-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02034-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02034-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anaerobic digestion of food waste with a selective mixed-microbial consortium and its evaluation with different optimization methods
Food waste (FW) is a valuable resource for anaerobic digestion (AD) due to its biochemical composition. This study aimed to optimize AD using two widely used optimization methods: Response Surface Methodology with Box–Behnken Design (RSM-BBD) and Taguchi orthogonal array L9. Organic load, oxidation–reduction potential, pH, and hydraulic retention time were evaluated for biogas production and volatile solids removal (VSr). The Taguchi method assessed responses based on the signal-to-noise ratio, resulting in optimal conditions for AD. After numerical optimization, the predicted biogas production was 440 mL, and VSr was 19.5%. However, the experimental observations of biogas production were 850 mL, and VSr was 41%. The RSM-BBD method, calculated based on analysis of variance, resulted in optimal conditions for AD, and after numerical optimization, the predicted biogas production was 852 mL, and VSr was 43%. However, the experimental observations of biogas production were 906 mL, and VSr was 44. Despite these results, the study found that Taguchi’s design provided approximate optimization response values and did not allow parameter interaction. In contrast, RSM-BBD provided precise optimal values and details on the impact of individual and combined parameters, making RSM-BBD the preferred choice for optimizing AD systems for better prediction accuracy and reproducibility.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles.
The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management.
The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).