ESG评级分歧与企业全要素生产率:推论与预测

Zhanli Li
{"title":"ESG评级分歧与企业全要素生产率:推论与预测","authors":"Zhanli Li","doi":"arxiv-2408.13895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the relationship between ESG rating disagreement and\ntotal factor productivity (TFP) based on data from Chinese domestic ESG rating\nagencies and financial data of A-share listed companies in China from 2015 to\n2022. On one hand, the empirical results show that ESG rating disagreement\nreduces corporate TFP, a conclusion that is validated through multiple\nrobustness tests. The mechanism analysis reveals an interaction effect between\ngreen innovation and ESG rating disagreement. Specifically, in firms without\nESG rating disagreement, green innovation promotes the improvement of TFP;\nhowever, in firms with disagreement, although ESG rating disagreement may drive\ngreen innovation, this does not lead to an increase in TFP. Furthermore, ESG\nrating disagreement lower corporate TFP by increasing financing constraints.\nThe heterogeneity analysis indicates that this effect is more pronounced in\nnon-state-owned, asset-intensive, and low-pollution enterprises. On the other\nhand, XGBoost regression demonstrates that ESG rating disagreement play a\nsignificant role in predicting TFP, with SHAP values showing that the main\neffects are more evident in firms with larger ESG rating disagreement.","PeriodicalId":501273,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESG Rating Disagreement and Corporate Total Factor Productivity:Inference and Prediction\",\"authors\":\"Zhanli Li\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.13895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the relationship between ESG rating disagreement and\\ntotal factor productivity (TFP) based on data from Chinese domestic ESG rating\\nagencies and financial data of A-share listed companies in China from 2015 to\\n2022. On one hand, the empirical results show that ESG rating disagreement\\nreduces corporate TFP, a conclusion that is validated through multiple\\nrobustness tests. The mechanism analysis reveals an interaction effect between\\ngreen innovation and ESG rating disagreement. Specifically, in firms without\\nESG rating disagreement, green innovation promotes the improvement of TFP;\\nhowever, in firms with disagreement, although ESG rating disagreement may drive\\ngreen innovation, this does not lead to an increase in TFP. Furthermore, ESG\\nrating disagreement lower corporate TFP by increasing financing constraints.\\nThe heterogeneity analysis indicates that this effect is more pronounced in\\nnon-state-owned, asset-intensive, and low-pollution enterprises. On the other\\nhand, XGBoost regression demonstrates that ESG rating disagreement play a\\nsignificant role in predicting TFP, with SHAP values showing that the main\\neffects are more evident in firms with larger ESG rating disagreement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.13895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.13895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文基于中国国内ESG评级机构的数据和2015-2022年中国A股上市公司的财务数据,探讨了ESG评级差异与全要素生产率(TFP)之间的关系。一方面,实证结果表明,ESG评级差异降低了企业全要素生产率,这一结论通过多残差检验得到了验证。机制分析揭示了绿色创新与ESG评级分歧之间的交互效应。具体而言,在不存在 ESG 评级分歧的企业中,绿色创新会促进全要素生产率的提高;但在存在分歧的企业中,尽管 ESG 评级分歧会推动绿色创新,但这并不会导致全要素生产率的提高。异质性分析表明,这种效应在非国有企业、资产密集型企业和低污染企业中更为明显。另一方面,XGBoost 回归表明,ESG 评级差异在预测全要素生产率方面发挥着重要作用,SHAP 值表明,ESG 评级差异较大的企业的主要效应更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ESG Rating Disagreement and Corporate Total Factor Productivity:Inference and Prediction
This paper explores the relationship between ESG rating disagreement and total factor productivity (TFP) based on data from Chinese domestic ESG rating agencies and financial data of A-share listed companies in China from 2015 to 2022. On one hand, the empirical results show that ESG rating disagreement reduces corporate TFP, a conclusion that is validated through multiple robustness tests. The mechanism analysis reveals an interaction effect between green innovation and ESG rating disagreement. Specifically, in firms without ESG rating disagreement, green innovation promotes the improvement of TFP; however, in firms with disagreement, although ESG rating disagreement may drive green innovation, this does not lead to an increase in TFP. Furthermore, ESG rating disagreement lower corporate TFP by increasing financing constraints. The heterogeneity analysis indicates that this effect is more pronounced in non-state-owned, asset-intensive, and low-pollution enterprises. On the other hand, XGBoost regression demonstrates that ESG rating disagreement play a significant role in predicting TFP, with SHAP values showing that the main effects are more evident in firms with larger ESG rating disagreement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信