信用评分:绩效与公平

Stefania Albanesi, Domonkos F. Vamossy
{"title":"信用评分:绩效与公平","authors":"Stefania Albanesi, Domonkos F. Vamossy","doi":"arxiv-2409.00296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Credit scores are critical for allocating consumer debt in the United States,\nyet little evidence is available on their performance. We benchmark a widely\nused credit score against a machine learning model of consumer default and find\nsignificant misclassification of borrowers, especially those with low scores.\nOur model improves predictive accuracy for young, low-income, and minority\ngroups due to its superior performance with low quality data, resulting in a\ngain in standing for these populations. Our findings suggest that improving\ncredit scoring performance could lead to more equitable access to credit.","PeriodicalId":501273,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Credit Scores: Performance and Equity\",\"authors\":\"Stefania Albanesi, Domonkos F. Vamossy\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.00296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Credit scores are critical for allocating consumer debt in the United States,\\nyet little evidence is available on their performance. We benchmark a widely\\nused credit score against a machine learning model of consumer default and find\\nsignificant misclassification of borrowers, especially those with low scores.\\nOur model improves predictive accuracy for young, low-income, and minority\\ngroups due to its superior performance with low quality data, resulting in a\\ngain in standing for these populations. Our findings suggest that improving\\ncredit scoring performance could lead to more equitable access to credit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.00296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.00296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,信用评分对分配消费债务至关重要,但有关其性能的证据却很少。我们将广泛使用的信用评分与消费者违约的机器学习模型进行对比,发现对借款人,尤其是低分借款人的分类存在重大误差。我们的模型由于在低质量数据方面表现出色,提高了对年轻人、低收入者和少数民族群体的预测准确性,从而再次提高了这些人群的信用等级。我们的研究结果表明,提高信用评分性能可以使人们更公平地获得信贷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Credit Scores: Performance and Equity
Credit scores are critical for allocating consumer debt in the United States, yet little evidence is available on their performance. We benchmark a widely used credit score against a machine learning model of consumer default and find significant misclassification of borrowers, especially those with low scores. Our model improves predictive accuracy for young, low-income, and minority groups due to its superior performance with low quality data, resulting in a gain in standing for these populations. Our findings suggest that improving credit scoring performance could lead to more equitable access to credit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信