星系团中的质量与光:Abell 370 案例

M. Limousin, A. Niemiec, B. Beauchesne, J. Diego, M. Jauzac, K. Sharon, A. Acebron, D. Lagattuta, G. Mahler, L. Williams, J. Richard, E. Jullo, L. Furtak, A. Faisst, B. Frye, P. Hibon, P. Natarajan, M. Rich
{"title":"星系团中的质量与光:Abell 370 案例","authors":"M. Limousin, A. Niemiec, B. Beauchesne, J. Diego, M. Jauzac, K. Sharon, A. Acebron, D. Lagattuta, G. Mahler, L. Williams, J. Richard, E. Jullo, L. Furtak, A. Faisst, B. Frye, P. Hibon, P. Natarajan, M. Rich","doi":"arxiv-2409.04584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parametric strong lensing studies of galaxy clusters often display\n\"misleading features\". This is the case in the galaxy cluster Abell 370. Using\nstrong lensing techniques, it has been described parametrically by a four dark\nmatter clumps model and galaxy scale perturbers, as well as a significant\nexternal shear component, which physical origin remains a challenge. The dark\nmatter distribution features a mass clump with no stellar counterpart and a\nsignificant offset between one of the dark matter clumps and its associated\nstellar counterpart. In this paper, based on BUFFALO data, we begin by\nrevisiting this mass model. We find a four dark matter clumps solution which\ndoes not require any external shear and provides a slightly better RMS compared\nto previous models. Investigating further this new solution, we present a class\nof models which can accurately reproduce the strong lensing data, but whose\nparameters for the dark matter component are poorly constrained. We then\ndevelop a model where each large scale dark matter component must be associated\nwith a stellar counterpart. This model is unable to reproduce the observational\nconstraints with an RMS smaller than 2.3\", and the parameters describing this\ndark matter component remain poorly constrained. Examining the total projected\nmass maps, we find a good agreement between the total mass and the stellar\ndistribution, both being bimodal. We interpret the \"misleading features\" of the\nfour dark matter clumps mass model and the failure of the three dark matter\nclumps mass model as being symptomatic of the lack of realism of a parametric\ndescription of the dark matter distribution, and encourage caution and\ncriticism on the outputs of parametric strong lensing modelling. We briefly\ndiscuss the implications of our results for using Abell 370 as a gravitational\ntelescope.","PeriodicalId":501207,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mass & Light in Galaxy Clusters: The case of Abell 370\",\"authors\":\"M. Limousin, A. Niemiec, B. Beauchesne, J. Diego, M. Jauzac, K. Sharon, A. Acebron, D. Lagattuta, G. Mahler, L. Williams, J. Richard, E. Jullo, L. Furtak, A. Faisst, B. Frye, P. Hibon, P. Natarajan, M. Rich\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.04584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Parametric strong lensing studies of galaxy clusters often display\\n\\\"misleading features\\\". This is the case in the galaxy cluster Abell 370. Using\\nstrong lensing techniques, it has been described parametrically by a four dark\\nmatter clumps model and galaxy scale perturbers, as well as a significant\\nexternal shear component, which physical origin remains a challenge. The dark\\nmatter distribution features a mass clump with no stellar counterpart and a\\nsignificant offset between one of the dark matter clumps and its associated\\nstellar counterpart. In this paper, based on BUFFALO data, we begin by\\nrevisiting this mass model. We find a four dark matter clumps solution which\\ndoes not require any external shear and provides a slightly better RMS compared\\nto previous models. Investigating further this new solution, we present a class\\nof models which can accurately reproduce the strong lensing data, but whose\\nparameters for the dark matter component are poorly constrained. We then\\ndevelop a model where each large scale dark matter component must be associated\\nwith a stellar counterpart. This model is unable to reproduce the observational\\nconstraints with an RMS smaller than 2.3\\\", and the parameters describing this\\ndark matter component remain poorly constrained. Examining the total projected\\nmass maps, we find a good agreement between the total mass and the stellar\\ndistribution, both being bimodal. We interpret the \\\"misleading features\\\" of the\\nfour dark matter clumps mass model and the failure of the three dark matter\\nclumps mass model as being symptomatic of the lack of realism of a parametric\\ndescription of the dark matter distribution, and encourage caution and\\ncriticism on the outputs of parametric strong lensing modelling. We briefly\\ndiscuss the implications of our results for using Abell 370 as a gravitational\\ntelescope.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对星系团的参数强透镜研究常常显示出 "误导特征"。Abell 370星系团就是这种情况。利用强透镜技术,用四个暗物质团块模型和星系尺度扰动器以及一个重要的外部剪切分量对其进行了参数描述,但其物理来源仍然是一个难题。暗物质分布的特点是一个没有恒星对应的质量团块,以及其中一个暗物质团块与其相关恒星对应物之间的显著偏移。本文基于 BUFFALO 数据,首先重新审视了这一质量模型。我们发现了一个不需要任何外部剪切力的四暗物质团块解决方案,与之前的模型相比,它提供了一个稍好的有效值。通过对这个新方案的进一步研究,我们提出了一类能够精确再现强透镜数据的模型,但其暗物质部分的参数却受到了很差的约束。然后,我们建立了一个模型,其中每个大尺度暗物质成分都必须与恒星对应物相关联。这个模型无法再现均方根小于 2.3 "的观测约束,而且描述暗物质成分的参数仍然约束不足。在研究总质量投影图时,我们发现总质量和恒星分布之间有很好的一致性,两者都是双峰型的。我们将四个暗物质团块质量模型的 "误导特征 "和三个暗物质团块质量模型的失败解释为暗物质分布的参数化描述缺乏现实性的症状,并鼓励对参数化强透镜建模的输出结果持谨慎和批评态度。我们简要讨论了我们的结果对使用 Abell 370 作为引力望远镜的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mass & Light in Galaxy Clusters: The case of Abell 370
Parametric strong lensing studies of galaxy clusters often display "misleading features". This is the case in the galaxy cluster Abell 370. Using strong lensing techniques, it has been described parametrically by a four dark matter clumps model and galaxy scale perturbers, as well as a significant external shear component, which physical origin remains a challenge. The dark matter distribution features a mass clump with no stellar counterpart and a significant offset between one of the dark matter clumps and its associated stellar counterpart. In this paper, based on BUFFALO data, we begin by revisiting this mass model. We find a four dark matter clumps solution which does not require any external shear and provides a slightly better RMS compared to previous models. Investigating further this new solution, we present a class of models which can accurately reproduce the strong lensing data, but whose parameters for the dark matter component are poorly constrained. We then develop a model where each large scale dark matter component must be associated with a stellar counterpart. This model is unable to reproduce the observational constraints with an RMS smaller than 2.3", and the parameters describing this dark matter component remain poorly constrained. Examining the total projected mass maps, we find a good agreement between the total mass and the stellar distribution, both being bimodal. We interpret the "misleading features" of the four dark matter clumps mass model and the failure of the three dark matter clumps mass model as being symptomatic of the lack of realism of a parametric description of the dark matter distribution, and encourage caution and criticism on the outputs of parametric strong lensing modelling. We briefly discuss the implications of our results for using Abell 370 as a gravitational telescope.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信