M. Limousin, A. Niemiec, B. Beauchesne, J. Diego, M. Jauzac, K. Sharon, A. Acebron, D. Lagattuta, G. Mahler, L. Williams, J. Richard, E. Jullo, L. Furtak, A. Faisst, B. Frye, P. Hibon, P. Natarajan, M. Rich
{"title":"星系团中的质量与光:Abell 370 案例","authors":"M. Limousin, A. Niemiec, B. Beauchesne, J. Diego, M. Jauzac, K. Sharon, A. Acebron, D. Lagattuta, G. Mahler, L. Williams, J. Richard, E. Jullo, L. Furtak, A. Faisst, B. Frye, P. Hibon, P. Natarajan, M. Rich","doi":"arxiv-2409.04584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parametric strong lensing studies of galaxy clusters often display\n\"misleading features\". This is the case in the galaxy cluster Abell 370. Using\nstrong lensing techniques, it has been described parametrically by a four dark\nmatter clumps model and galaxy scale perturbers, as well as a significant\nexternal shear component, which physical origin remains a challenge. The dark\nmatter distribution features a mass clump with no stellar counterpart and a\nsignificant offset between one of the dark matter clumps and its associated\nstellar counterpart. In this paper, based on BUFFALO data, we begin by\nrevisiting this mass model. We find a four dark matter clumps solution which\ndoes not require any external shear and provides a slightly better RMS compared\nto previous models. Investigating further this new solution, we present a class\nof models which can accurately reproduce the strong lensing data, but whose\nparameters for the dark matter component are poorly constrained. We then\ndevelop a model where each large scale dark matter component must be associated\nwith a stellar counterpart. This model is unable to reproduce the observational\nconstraints with an RMS smaller than 2.3\", and the parameters describing this\ndark matter component remain poorly constrained. Examining the total projected\nmass maps, we find a good agreement between the total mass and the stellar\ndistribution, both being bimodal. We interpret the \"misleading features\" of the\nfour dark matter clumps mass model and the failure of the three dark matter\nclumps mass model as being symptomatic of the lack of realism of a parametric\ndescription of the dark matter distribution, and encourage caution and\ncriticism on the outputs of parametric strong lensing modelling. We briefly\ndiscuss the implications of our results for using Abell 370 as a gravitational\ntelescope.","PeriodicalId":501207,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mass & Light in Galaxy Clusters: The case of Abell 370\",\"authors\":\"M. Limousin, A. Niemiec, B. Beauchesne, J. Diego, M. Jauzac, K. Sharon, A. Acebron, D. Lagattuta, G. Mahler, L. Williams, J. Richard, E. Jullo, L. Furtak, A. Faisst, B. Frye, P. Hibon, P. Natarajan, M. Rich\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.04584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Parametric strong lensing studies of galaxy clusters often display\\n\\\"misleading features\\\". This is the case in the galaxy cluster Abell 370. Using\\nstrong lensing techniques, it has been described parametrically by a four dark\\nmatter clumps model and galaxy scale perturbers, as well as a significant\\nexternal shear component, which physical origin remains a challenge. The dark\\nmatter distribution features a mass clump with no stellar counterpart and a\\nsignificant offset between one of the dark matter clumps and its associated\\nstellar counterpart. In this paper, based on BUFFALO data, we begin by\\nrevisiting this mass model. We find a four dark matter clumps solution which\\ndoes not require any external shear and provides a slightly better RMS compared\\nto previous models. Investigating further this new solution, we present a class\\nof models which can accurately reproduce the strong lensing data, but whose\\nparameters for the dark matter component are poorly constrained. We then\\ndevelop a model where each large scale dark matter component must be associated\\nwith a stellar counterpart. This model is unable to reproduce the observational\\nconstraints with an RMS smaller than 2.3\\\", and the parameters describing this\\ndark matter component remain poorly constrained. Examining the total projected\\nmass maps, we find a good agreement between the total mass and the stellar\\ndistribution, both being bimodal. We interpret the \\\"misleading features\\\" of the\\nfour dark matter clumps mass model and the failure of the three dark matter\\nclumps mass model as being symptomatic of the lack of realism of a parametric\\ndescription of the dark matter distribution, and encourage caution and\\ncriticism on the outputs of parametric strong lensing modelling. We briefly\\ndiscuss the implications of our results for using Abell 370 as a gravitational\\ntelescope.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mass & Light in Galaxy Clusters: The case of Abell 370
Parametric strong lensing studies of galaxy clusters often display
"misleading features". This is the case in the galaxy cluster Abell 370. Using
strong lensing techniques, it has been described parametrically by a four dark
matter clumps model and galaxy scale perturbers, as well as a significant
external shear component, which physical origin remains a challenge. The dark
matter distribution features a mass clump with no stellar counterpart and a
significant offset between one of the dark matter clumps and its associated
stellar counterpart. In this paper, based on BUFFALO data, we begin by
revisiting this mass model. We find a four dark matter clumps solution which
does not require any external shear and provides a slightly better RMS compared
to previous models. Investigating further this new solution, we present a class
of models which can accurately reproduce the strong lensing data, but whose
parameters for the dark matter component are poorly constrained. We then
develop a model where each large scale dark matter component must be associated
with a stellar counterpart. This model is unable to reproduce the observational
constraints with an RMS smaller than 2.3", and the parameters describing this
dark matter component remain poorly constrained. Examining the total projected
mass maps, we find a good agreement between the total mass and the stellar
distribution, both being bimodal. We interpret the "misleading features" of the
four dark matter clumps mass model and the failure of the three dark matter
clumps mass model as being symptomatic of the lack of realism of a parametric
description of the dark matter distribution, and encourage caution and
criticism on the outputs of parametric strong lensing modelling. We briefly
discuss the implications of our results for using Abell 370 as a gravitational
telescope.